Position 2021: Ruck Discussion

Which ruck setup are you planning on starting with?

  • Gawn/Grundy/Flynn

    Votes: 82 47.4%
  • Gawn/Grundy/Meek

    Votes: 5 2.9%
  • Gawn/Grundy/Hunter

    Votes: 8 4.6%
  • Gawn/Flynn/Meek

    Votes: 25 14.5%
  • Gawn/Flynn/Hunter

    Votes: 11 6.4%
  • Gawn/Meek/Hunter

    Votes: 2 1.2%
  • Grundy/Flynn/Meek

    Votes: 14 8.1%
  • Grundy/Flynn/Hunter

    Votes: 9 5.2%
  • Grundy/Meek/Hunter

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 17 9.8%

  • Total voters
    173
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,810
AFL Club
Collingwood
#61
The stumbling block for me starting Preuss is the draw. Double teamed in rnd1 by St Kilda, Rnd 3 and 4 against Gawn and Grundy, rnd 6 Stef Martin and Rnd 10 NicNat. It's hard to see him getting a clean run where he can climb past $400k. If I want to bet against Gawn I think I'd rather have Marshall at R2 or a cheaper Hickey with a better draw. Is there a chance for someone younger, Coleman-Jones, Williams?
Isn't Coleman-Jones still suspended ?
 
Joined
3 Feb 2021
Messages
2,410
Likes
13,067
AFL Club
Essendon
#63
A couple of observations:

We should not just look at Preuss as someone we're going to turn into Gawn by round #. As pointed out above, a serious amount of cash (and probably multiple trades) is required to achieve that goal. If (and it's a big if) Marshall starts putting out scores at Gawn / Grundy levels and/or G/G fall back to the pack, the Preuss trade can be to a FWD (swinging Marshall to the rucks). This would also require a sufficient number of FWD premos averaging close to or better than the rucks to justify moving Marshall to a ruck spot. As we've seen over past seasons, that is unlikely, particularly with the scoring practices over the past two years. The 6th best FWD (on averages) has been around the 100 mark most years.

For me the Preuss pick has some merit if you're taking the punt that Gundy and Gawn will come back to the pack and there is a lack of decent rookies come round 1.
 
Joined
24 Mar 2015
Messages
4,154
Likes
14,751
AFL Club
North Melb.
#64
A couple of observations:

We should not just look at Preuss as someone we're going to turn into Gawn by round #. As pointed out above, a serious amount of cash (and probably multiple trades) is required to achieve that goal. If (and it's a big if) Marshall starts putting out scores at Gawn / Grundy levels and/or G/G fall back to the pack, the Preuss trade can be to a FWD (swinging Marshall to the rucks). This would also require a sufficient number of FWD premos averaging close to or better than the rucks to justify moving Marshall to a ruck spot. As we've seen over past seasons, that is unlikely, particularly with the scoring practices over the past two years. The 6th best FWD (on averages) has been around the 100 mark most years.

For me the Preuss pick has some merit if you're taking the punt that Gundy and Gawn will come back to the pack and there is a lack of decent rookies come round 1.
Welcome to the conversation @Wheedus :)

The more I read from people, the more we seem to get to two quite independent questions and only if you answer both of them do you end up with Brayden Preuss in your side.

1. Are either of Gawn or Grundy inherently bad picks in their own right? ie. Over-priced and to be avoided because there is no justifiable way they will maintain close to their 2020 average compared with other similarly priced players you might use as captain (of which there are only 6 priced more than Grundy, including Gawn). If yes to this, don't pick either/both of them and move to question 2 ;).

2. Can Brayden Preuss do what is needed to be a successful mid-priced cash cow? The bar for this seems to be an average of around 95+ by R10 to make 150k. If yes, slot him in. If no, find a different way to fill you ruck slots (Marshall at R2 to swap later when you upgrade into a top ruck seems like a good option).

When we look at the question of Gawn vs Preuss straight out it assumes both of the above: people have put forward lots of points as to why either one won't work, or why they both will.
 
Joined
7 Sep 2020
Messages
12,069
Likes
42,465
#65
Welcome to the conversation @Wheedus :)

The more I read from people, the more we seem to get to two quite independent questions and only if you answer both of them do you end up with Brayden Preuss in your side.

1. Are either of Gawn or Grundy inherently bad picks in their own right? ie. Over-priced and to be avoided because there is no justifiable way they will maintain close to their 2020 average compared with other similarly priced players you might use as captain (of which there are only 6 priced more than Grundy, including Gawn). If yes to this, don't pick either/both of them and move to question 2 ;).

2. Can Brayden Preuss do what is needed to be a successful mid-priced cash cow? The bar for this seems to be an average of around 95+ by R10 to make 150k. If yes, slot him in. If no, find a different way to fill you ruck slots (Marshall at R2 to swap later when you upgrade into a top ruck seems like a good option).

When we look at the question of Gawn vs Preuss straight out it assumes both of the above: people have put forward lots of points as to why either one won't work, or why they both will.
I'll be picking Gawn as I think he is my defence first approach with the safety of VC/C. That is also the first step into my offense having his scoring capabilities locked away. Can then be less reliant on the midfielder VC/C options who can be susceptible to tags.
 
Joined
24 Mar 2015
Messages
4,154
Likes
14,751
AFL Club
North Melb.
#66
I'll be picking Gawn as I think he is my defence first approach with the safety of VC/C. That is also the first step into my offense having his scoring capabilities locked away. Can then be less reliant on the midfielder VC/C options who can be susceptible to tags.
Same for me really. If most players go on a run of form, they score 4 or 5 100s in a row: if big Max finds a vein of form, he belts out a bunch of 140+s in a row (2018: 3 out of 4 140+, then another 3 in a row later; 2019: 5 in a row, 2020: 6 in a row!).

It's perma C territory that just burns teams that don't have him, no matter how good your mid-pricers are.
 
Joined
9 Feb 2015
Messages
9,440
Likes
57,908
AFL Club
West Coast
#69
Max Gawn, might be scaring players off with his huge price tag — he’s the first player to ever start a season priced at over $750,000. Gawn, who averaged almost 140 points a game last year — is No. 14 on the list, with almost two thirds of coaches prepared to start without the bearded superstar.

Nice - great news I think, the more unique the better.
 
Joined
26 Jun 2019
Messages
2,559
Likes
9,517
AFL Club
Richmond
#70
The stumbling block for me starting Preuss is the draw. Double teamed in rnd1 by St Kilda, Rnd 3 and 4 against Gawn and Grundy, rnd 6 Stef Martin and Rnd 10 NicNat. It's hard to see him getting a clean run where he can climb past $400k. If I want to bet against Gawn I think I'd rather have Marshall at R2 or a cheaper Hickey with a better draw. Is there a chance for someone younger, Coleman-Jones, Williams?
CCJ is booked out for the first 5 games but could well get a run after that, Chol is not a viable 2nd ruck/Fwd option and with Soldo out for the year he will get an opportunity.
 
Joined
15 Oct 2018
Messages
3,912
Likes
12,177
AFL Club
Essendon
#73
That's a pretty big "if". He's only had 3 scores under 85 in the last 3 seasons, one of them was an injury which he followed up with 117, 132, 133 and 134, one was an 82 that he followed up with back to back 156s (to end the season) and the other was a 76 he followed up with 140, 145, 151 and 131.

I think he's overpriced but Preuss is so high risk, basically there is Hickey as a bailout in the event he is injured or just fails. He also needs to do pretty damn well to close it inside 2 trades, even if Gawn falls 100k. If Gawn holds even remotely close to where is he or Preuss is just average it becomes a nightmare upgrade. Realistically Preuss probably needs to be at 95, last year with the inflated ruck scoring there were only 9 rucks, and that includes Stanley's 7 game effort, that made that level. Guys like Sinclair, Darcy, Soldo, Ceglar and Pittonet were all only 70s types. There were 7 in 2019 with the enormous ROB breakout being the 7th.

I actually think Preuss has looked decent and can do it, more just for the planning involved in case he doesn't which is also absolutely possible.
All of the guys who are midpriced forwards can bail you out if you have both Preuss and Marshall. Not as high risk as it would usually be.

If Preuss isn't an option my plan is to start Marshall at R2.
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,810
AFL Club
Collingwood
#77
Just start Fyfe and/or Jelly.

Once they break turn them into Gawn/Grundy with a little bit of DPP magic (Marshall at R2)

Always pick up a fallen mid premium for $ 500-525k around Bye time.

Bypass the danger of Preuss altogether.
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,772
Likes
26,267
AFL Club
Sydney
#78
All of the guys who are midpriced forwards can bail you out if you have both Preuss and Marshall. Not as high risk as it would usually be.

If Preuss isn't an option my plan is to start Marshall at R2.
Until Marshall get's injured :ROFLMAO: (I had this plan a couple of years ago with Lycett and then got injured and Hinkleyed back to back)

Or in my case, you've already got all the forwards!
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,960
Likes
126,628
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
#79
For those starting Preuss, an option to consider is starting a Dunkley/Dusty/Caldwell/etc in the mids and Laird in defence.

If trading Preuss (due to injury, poor form, etc), Marshall moves to R2 and via DPP you can either select a midfielder or defender.
 
Joined
30 Dec 2019
Messages
1,540
Likes
5,910
AFL Club
Richmond
#80
Yep.

Still suspended for 5 rounds I think.

Couldn't of got the timing worse with Soldo going down late last year.

Would of been a solid chance of playing early this year too.
CCJ is booked out for the first 5 games but could well get a run after that, Chol is not a viable 2nd ruck/Fwd option and with Soldo out for the year he will get an opportunity.

He was suspended for 10 rounds, however with the loss to Brisbane in the finals, Richmond played 6 games.

He should be back at round 5
 
Top