Position 2021: Ruck Discussion

Which ruck setup are you planning on starting with?

  • Gawn/Grundy/Flynn

    Votes: 82 47.4%
  • Gawn/Grundy/Meek

    Votes: 5 2.9%
  • Gawn/Grundy/Hunter

    Votes: 8 4.6%
  • Gawn/Flynn/Meek

    Votes: 25 14.5%
  • Gawn/Flynn/Hunter

    Votes: 11 6.4%
  • Gawn/Meek/Hunter

    Votes: 2 1.2%
  • Grundy/Flynn/Meek

    Votes: 14 8.1%
  • Grundy/Flynn/Hunter

    Votes: 9 5.2%
  • Grundy/Meek/Hunter

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 17 9.8%

  • Total voters
    173
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,260
AFL Club
Sydney
I've only got Grundy right now, will stick with him next week and see what happens but right now he's my only guy alongside Cripps that's looking like he needs correcting so if that holds up then will go from there. After last year though I'm very hesitant to move to quickly.
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,260
AFL Club
Sydney
Wet game, rucks score well. The next 4 all split their ruck time forward and we're damaging. Is this the end of the loan wolf theory until it gets wet. La Nina anyone?
It didn't get wet until a quarter into the 4th quarter and they'd already put the points on the board at that point. I think it was more a case of both rucks were so bad that they ended up just taking it out of the ruck a lot when the other ruck completely whiffed on the contest and/or thumping it long for HOtA stats.

Was a weird game watching their ratios while not thinking they played remotely well.

The rucks resting forward scoring better is the truly confusing outcome right now.
 
Joined
15 Sep 2012
Messages
475
Likes
217
AFL Club
Essendon
I went with gawn, flynn, hunter. So far its okay, I'm not prepared to say that's a win yet. Time will tell in around 5 or so weeks. Honestly I'm now trying to make up my mind on who to field, hunter or flynn. Missed gulden as i chose to field powell and had the E on scott which is a bitter pill to swallow seeing a 117k priced player score 139 on the pine
 
Joined
3 May 2017
Messages
2,684
Likes
8,886
AFL Club
Hawthorn
It didn't get wet until a quarter into the 4th quarter and they'd already put the points on the board at that point. I think it was more a case of both rucks were so bad that they ended up just taking it out of the ruck a lot when the other ruck completely whiffed on the contest and/or thumping it long for HOtA stats.

Was a weird game watching their ratios while not thinking they played remotely well.

The rucks resting forward scoring better is the truly confusing outcome right now.
Argh I thought with houses floating away and a cut away at the end of the Hawks game to see the song sung by a group of soaked players meant it was... thanks for the correction, and the observation that both were rubbish. Both made my MPM team (not my real one), so happy with the scores. Cheers
 
Joined
3 Dec 2014
Messages
4,358
Likes
7,050
AFL Club
Essendon
There is potentially a truckload of cash to be saved by trading one or both of Gawn and Grundy ahead of their big price drops in round 3.

Down to a rookie (Hunter/Meek/Fullarton) or even to a midpricer (i.e. Draper).

If you were to get rid of both, that's at least 2 trades, without factoring in that we will likely want them back which is at least another 3 - 5 trades.

It's a season-defining decision, no doubt. Do we cop the likely huge cash loss and keep the set and forget strategy? Or do we redistribute the cash into point-scoring power but blow 2 - 7 trades in the process?
 
Joined
26 Jun 2019
Messages
2,559
Likes
9,517
AFL Club
Richmond
There is potentially a truckload of cash to be saved by trading one or both of Gawn and Grundy ahead of their big price drops in round 3.

Down to a rookie (Hunter/Meek/Fullarton) or even to a midpricer (i.e. Draper).

If you were to get rid of both, that's at least 2 trades, without factoring in that we will likely want them back which is at least another 3 - 5 trades.

It's a season-defining decision, no doubt. Do we cop the likely huge cash loss and keep the set and forget strategy? Or do we redistribute the cash into point-scoring power but blow 2 - 7 trades in the process?
I don't have Grawndy, if you trade them out while they still have value then you might get the rookies on the bubble and points scored in other possies and at 150k/trade it could be worthwhile, but as you said you probably want them back in again which costs more trades (150k@)

If you don't trade them out then there might be an opportunity lost, but by keeping them you are not locking in a cash loss because you already have them.

Hope that makes sense
 
Joined
8 Feb 2018
Messages
1,239
Likes
2,365
There is potentially a truckload of cash to be saved by trading one or both of Gawn and Grundy ahead of their big price drops in round 3.

Down to a rookie (Hunter/Meek/Fullarton) or even to a midpricer (i.e. Draper).

If you were to get rid of both, that's at least 2 trades, without factoring in that we will likely want them back which is at least another 3 - 5 trades.

It's a season-defining decision, no doubt. Do we cop the likely huge cash loss and keep the set and forget strategy? Or do we redistribute the cash into point-scoring power but blow 2 - 7 trades in the process?
I think unless they look beyond awful I’m just going to stick it out. If you trade them out you a basically locking in a loss, while still conceding that they are #1 and #2 rucks for the year. The people who have started with one/none of Grawndy have saved trades on you and points already.
 
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,760
Likes
11,757
AFL Club
West Coast
I have Gawn, Martin and Flynn, it will be interesting to see how the bearded burbler from Melbourne goes next week!
I have Gawn as well. I see a lot of coaches thinking of trading Gawn out and using the cash elsewhere. For mine it is worth taking a look at Gawn's previous record. Since the start of the 2018 season he has not gone sub 100 and not hit a ton the week after. His record at Docklands in his past 6 games is, well, phenomenal. His record against St K is also good in recent seasons although this might not be the St K of old. Maybe the game style has changed this season but I would be giving him at least another shot at it. If he struggles again then maybe reassess but if the end of the world is coming for rucks how is it that Big O scored 109, Hickey 123, Goldy 109 and Flynn 140? And none of them are supposed to be in the same league as Gawndy.
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,810
AFL Club
Collingwood
The story so far

Hickey 123
McInerney 109
English 96
Martin 94
GAWN 93
McEvoy 89
Ceglar 86
Pittonet 85
Draper 76
Nankervis 76
Stanley 75
GRUNDY 70
O'Brien 55
Meek 43
Fullarton 38
Let's add the Sunday Rucks

Flynn 140
Goldstein 109
Lycett 94
Naitanui 86
Witts 75
Ladhams 45
Hunter 44
Vardy 34

And I forgot Jenkins 43

Be interesting to see Round 2 scores , personally think Gawn & Grundy owners have a lot easier decision to make (every option available) to those Hunter/Meek owners (myself included) if they need to be fixed ASAP.

Hard to see a clear challenger to R1 & R2 after one game.

Trading Danger to a rookie gives $$$ to play with but if you wish to keep the same structure , you probably need to trade him to a premium.

Bring on Round 2 ruck scores.
 
Joined
14 Jul 2020
Messages
1,192
Likes
2,132
AFL Club
Collingwood
Gawn looked much better in the second half of their game, scored 60 odd points. Not concerned yet about him, Grundy however looked completely out of sorts.
i think the combination of Martin and English overwhelmed him, the few moments i actually watched the game it looked like he was tired and couldn't counter the double rucks

I am holding out for this week to see a difference
 
Joined
30 Jan 2013
Messages
1,376
Likes
5,070
i think the combination of Martin and English overwhelmed him, the few moments i actually watched the game it looked like he was tired and couldn't counter the double rucks
Martin neutralised him, which would normally transfer to a reasonable 100-110 score, but then the Dogs midfield got completely on top which did the rest of the damage to his score. When Martin played Grundy in the past it's predated Brisbane having a good midfield.
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
i think the combination of Martin and English overwhelmed him, the few moments i actually watched the game it looked like he was tired and couldn't counter the double rucks

I am holding out for this week to see a difference
Yeh you are right, he was pretty much physically neutralised by Martin, in the past he basically smashed English as the lone hand ruck. Buckley might bring Cameron in however which raises its own issues with Grundy.
 
Joined
22 Feb 2013
Messages
9,668
Likes
20,502
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Yeh you are right, he was pretty much physically neutralised by Martin, in the past he basically smashed English as the lone hand ruck. Buckley might bring Cameron in however which raises its own issues with Grundy.
The Pies midfield is the bigger issue for me, particularly as they are either underdone (Adams), dropping off (Pendles) or very green (Daicos, Brown el al.).

Who is their mid stars? No good if oppositions continuely shark Grundy's taps and he can't impact otherwise.
 
Joined
13 Mar 2012
Messages
2,790
Likes
2,985
AFL Club
Adelaide
There is potentially a truckload of cash to be saved by trading one or both of Gawn and Grundy ahead of their big price drops in round 3.

Down to a rookie (Hunter/Meek/Fullarton) or even to a midpricer (i.e. Draper).

If you were to get rid of both, that's at least 2 trades, without factoring in that we will likely want them back which is at least another 3 - 5 trades.

It's a season-defining decision, no doubt. Do we cop the likely huge cash loss and keep the set and forget strategy? Or do we redistribute the cash into point-scoring power but blow 2 - 7 trades in the process?
In 2019 Gawndy cost $1.4m to start.

R1 - Grundy 81, Gawn 87
Post R2
Grundy 137, 132, 160, 100, 134
Gawn 116. 126, 113, 126, 145

By R11 Grundy was $656k, Gawn was $647k. That was about Grundy’s low price point up to then, Gawn’s low point to then was $640k

There may not be “truckloads” of cash lost.
 
Last edited:
Joined
14 Jul 2020
Messages
1,192
Likes
2,132
AFL Club
Collingwood
The Pies midfield is the bigger issue for me, particularly as they are either underdone (Adams), dropping off (Pendles) or very green (Daicos, Brown el al.).

Who is their mid stars? No good if oppositions continuely shark Grundy's taps and he can't impact otherwise.
This is why getting Merret would be good:ROFLMAO:
But yeah all the stars are slowly dropping, injury-prone or a few years off being all-stars, very scary for me as both a Supercoach and as a Pies supporter
 
Joined
2 Mar 2014
Messages
588
Likes
2,041
AFL Club
Essendon
This is why getting Merret would be good:ROFLMAO:
But yeah all the stars are slowly dropping, injury-prone or a few years off being all-stars, very scary for me as both a Supercoach and as a Pies supporter
Why would Merrett go to the pies? Demonstration of horrible culture within across the club. Stay with bombers and partner up with Dunkley next year
 
Joined
14 Jul 2020
Messages
1,192
Likes
2,132
AFL Club
Collingwood
Why would Merrett go to the pies? Demonstration of horrible culture within across the club. Stay with bombers and partner up with Dunkley next year
Yeah, to be fair they haven't advertised their club well lately, But also the Dogs are getting crowded which isn't a good sign.
Just saying that the Pies need a better Mid within the next year or so. Someone that's young but not too young, otherwise Grundys going to have a terrible 7 years
 
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
2,295
Likes
6,291
Gawn looked much better in the second half of their game, scored 60 odd points. Not concerned yet about him, Grundy however looked completely out of sorts.
39 hitouts - I think our midfield was just as equally to blame for his score as we were pathetic on the night.

In hindsight the Bulldogs were probably the very worst team to face first up with a new midfield group.
 
Top