Position 2022: Forward Discussion

Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,809
AFL Club
Collingwood
Didn't Mcgov leave the ground with hammy tightness last week?
Were a few posts possibly mentioning something , haven't seen any confirmation though.

Easy fix once teams are announced if he is missing.

In reality will probably need to lose one of Heeney/Butters and put those $$$ into a stronger D5.

Rookies D5-D8 don't look viable to me , Round 7 is a long time to wait for Daicos.
 
Last edited:
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
103
Likes
637
AFL Club
Adelaide
I'm not sold on Rachele. He scored 3 goals and had heaps of tackles but still only scored in the 80's in both games.
If he doesn't kick goals he will likely score around 45 to 50 imo.
Both the goals and the tackles are a good sign though. It shows he has multiple ways of salvaging a good score even if things don't go his way.

His scoring will be up and down due to the nature of playing up forward in what will still be a weaker team this season. His willingness to apply pressure and ability to hit the scoreboard gives me confidence that he'll have one or two spike games at some point which will push his price up to allow you to upgrade him somewhat easily.

Plus the job security makes him a really good loophole candidate when the teams start thinning out in a few weeks.
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,769
Likes
26,258
AFL Club
Sydney
War in Ukraine, season about to start, election build up occurring... Okay, can we release the DeGeoy wet toilet paper slap on the finger.... $10k fine. The week of international women's day. #disgrace
Not sure what international women's day has to do with it, 10k seems about right compared to other punishments, Bolton got 20k for actually starting a fight and being the aggressor last year, could argue that not being the instigator justifies a lesser fine albeit I'm all for scumbags like those two getting fined to kingdom come :LOL:
 

Diabolical

Leadership Group
Joined
17 Jun 2014
Messages
9,612
Likes
37,694
AFL Club
Essendon
Not sure what international women's day has to do with it, 10k seems about right compared to other punishments, Bolton got 20k for actually starting a fight and being the aggressor last year, could argue that not being the instigator justifies a lesser fine albeit I'm all for scumbags like those two getting fined to kingdom come :LOL:
International women's day gives an opportunity to highlight inequality ...

47,000 women and girls were killed by their male partners or family members in 2020 – and those are only the deaths we know about

47 countries still have no repercussions for husbands who rape their wife

2.7 billion women are legally restricted from having the same choice of jobs as men

14.2% is the size of Australia’s gender pay gap

45 countries do not have specific laws against domestic violence

30% of women globally have experienced sexual or physical violence in their lifetime
 
Last edited:
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,769
Likes
26,258
AFL Club
Sydney
International women's day gives an opportunity to highlight inequality ...

47,000 women and girls were killed by their male partners or family members in 2020 – and those are only the deaths we know about

47 countries still have no repercussions for husbands who rape their wife

2.7 billion women are legally restricted from having the same choice of jobs as men

14.2% is the size of Australia’s gender pay gap

45 countries do not have specific laws against domestic violence

30% of women globally have experienced sexual or physical violence in their lifetime
Literally none of that has anything to do with De Goey getting a fine...
 
Joined
3 May 2017
Messages
2,684
Likes
8,886
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Literally none of that has anything to do with De Goey getting a fine...
Perhaps the final point does? However I think you have actually missed the point that @randomcliche was trying to make.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-05/jordan-de-goey-afl-violence-against-women/100593122

AFL players hold a privileged position and with that comes obligations, of which they are well versed in.

He was charged for violence against women and like many women before and unfortunately many to come she may not have got the justice she deserved. Only the charge against a bloke stood in the end.

If you are trying obfuscate your lack of commitment to gender equality there isn't a much better time to release lack of punishment.

The AFL statement completely neglected the gender based aspect. It chose the narrow road, the low road, and tried to hide it.
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,809
AFL Club
Collingwood
Now thinks get interesting on this line if the likes of Rachele , McCartin , Durdin , Baldwin etc are viable (onfield and bench)

Assuming Dunkley is a lock @ F1 do we drop the Bailey/Butters/de Goey/Heeney/Thomas price types or drop the Brodie , Coniglio , Curnow , McGovern , Naish , Ralphsmith , Xerri etc types instead ?
 
Joined
11 Apr 2014
Messages
445
Likes
2,018
I’m struggling to get excited about Xerri as a pick, is anyone else? See him popping up in lots of teams.

Yes, there’s the possibility of ruck time, and rookies are tight this year but the guy played 8 games in a row last year for an average of 38… Thirty. Eight. Not much to get excited about for $200k.

I see in the stats he was getting hit outs too, so I’m guessing he spent some time in the ruck? Or was he playing predominantly as a forward?

I want to pick him excitedly hoping for ~80 average, but I’m struggling to see it…
 
Joined
5 Feb 2014
Messages
1,354
Likes
6,817
AFL Club
Carlton
I’m struggling to get excited about Xerri as a pick, is anyone else? See him popping up in lots of teams.
He was really poor last year. Centre bounce numbers were 16%, 16%, 27%, 35%, 14%, 18%, 21%, 33%, so pretty much pinch hitting ruck.

Saints came for in the off-season but North refused to trade him, perhaps indicating they had plans this year for him to transition to the main ruck.

If we don't get 60%+ in the ruck, I think he will be a poor selection, but hopefully that main ruck role does eventuate (closer to 70% would be nice!) and then he would have big upside.
 
Joined
11 Apr 2014
Messages
445
Likes
2,018
He was really poor last year. Centre bounce numbers were 16%, 16%, 27%, 35%, 14%, 18%, 21%, 33%, so pretty much pinch hitting ruck.

Saints came for in the off-season but North refused to trade him, perhaps indicating they had plans this year for him to transition to the main ruck.

If we don't get 60%+ in the ruck, I think he will be a poor selection, but hopefully that main ruck role does eventuate (closer to 70% would be nice!) and then he would have big upside.
Great extra context, thanks legend. More to think about
 
Joined
15 Mar 2019
Messages
15,034
Likes
57,916
AFL Club
Hawthorn
I’m struggling to get excited about Xerri as a pick, is anyone else? See him popping up in lots of teams.

Yes, there’s the possibility of ruck time, and rookies are tight this year but the guy played 8 games in a row last year for an average of 38… Thirty. Eight. Not much to get excited about for $200k.

I see in the stats he was getting hit outs too, so I’m guessing he spent some time in the ruck? Or was he playing predominantly as a forward?

I want to pick him excitedly hoping for ~80 average, but I’m struggling to see it…
156 ruck contests from 8 games, 59 hit outs, 20.3% to advantage.

Compare to Goldstein who had 1306 ruck contests from 22 games, you can see he wasn't doing a large amount of ruck work last year. Goldy had over 50% hit outs won and 30.7% to advantage, clearly Goldy was the #1 last year. Xerri definitely a risky pick on those numbers, but Goldy is getting older.

CCJ was 61/157 for hit outs, 26.2% to advantage for comparison, but I'd argue Richmond had better players to get the ball which accounts for a bit of the difference in HTA. CCJ v Xerri as a second ruck option is closer than I expected.
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
Now thinks get interesting on this line if the likes of Rachele , McCartin , Durdin , Baldwin etc are viable (onfield and bench)

Assuming Dunkley is a lock @ F1 do we drop the Bailey/Butters/de Goey/Heeney/Thomas price types or drop the Brodie , Coniglio , Curnow , McGovern , Naish , Ralphsmith , Xerri etc types instead ?
Butters and Coniglio are set and forget picks, it would be from the other $200k+ players who would be the first to go.
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
Too many damn options, just getting more and more confused now.
Yeh and unfortunately all on the one line. I think Butters is really a non negotiable though, he's a 100ppg at least and at that price his hurt factor will be pretty huge if you don't have him and he pumps out some big scores early on. Structure wise I think he has to be no lower than F2 with Cogs at F3.
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,809
AFL Club
Collingwood
Yeh and unfortunately all on the one line. I think Butters is really a non negotiable though, he's a 100ppg at least and at that price his hurt factor will be pretty huge if you don't have him and he pumps out some big scores early on.
Might go back to Dunkley , Heeney & Butters.

Slot Cogs & Brodie in the mids for now and start the other 3 forward with Durdin & Baldwin on the bench.
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
Might go back to Dunkley , Heeney & Butters.

Slot Cogs & Brodie in the mids for now and start the other 3 forward with Durdin & Baldwin on the bench.
I still think Heeney is a solid pick even with role issues, the issue is with Cogs and Brodie in the mids, whose spots do they take?
 
Top