Discussion 2024: AFL RDT Dream Team Discussion

Joined
25 Feb 2019
Messages
8,688
Likes
13,892
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Nice Dazza, 2681 here, won all my league matches and in my own league where I was sitting 8th, I'm now 9th...stoked! :mad::sick::poop:
2561 and won 6/10 league wins, 3 opponents scored over 2600 including you well done with your score, thought I had one of those games in the bag at half time between Dees Tigers game until Gawn out scored Petracca in the second by about 35 pts and lost by 9😢
 
Last edited:
Joined
17 Mar 2022
Messages
308
Likes
1,263
AFL Club
Fremantle
Looking at a 23rd premium (to send Day or Sheezel to the bench). Chesser and Maric out.

I can afford anyone (with 2 trades) so it's either:
1. Doch or Sicily with Day covering mids and backs and Fogarty covering forwards.
2. Macrae or Butters with Sheezel and Day covering all 3 positions. No ruck cover but 1 trade to cover that.

I feel that Doch and Sicily are more likely to score better but the cover feels more complete with a fwd.

1691113851584.png
 
Joined
10 Sep 2020
Messages
2,716
Likes
6,784
AFL Club
Collingwood
Looking at a 23rd premium (to send Day or Sheezel to the bench). Chesser and Maric out.

I can afford anyone (with 2 trades) so it's either:
1. Doch or Sicily with Day covering mids and backs and Fogarty covering forwards.
2. Macrae or Butters with Sheezel and Day covering all 3 positions. No ruck cover but 1 trade to cover that.

I feel that Doch and Sicily are more likely to score better but the cover feels more complete with a fwd.
Sheezel outperforming Macrae and Butters in 3 & 5 Rd AVGs. Dunno if they're an improvement.

Doc might give you an opportunity to loop with Day (if Mullin plays after one of them). Doc also DPP.

Sicily not DPP, but likely doesn't matter as you have others to change position.
But given he's also a Hawk, doesn't let you loop with Day.

But yes, a FOR option would give better coverage and double loop possibility. Flanders?
 
Joined
20 Jan 2016
Messages
568
Likes
2,843
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Looking at a 23rd premium (to send Day or Sheezel to the bench). Chesser and Maric out.

I can afford anyone (with 2 trades) so it's either:
1. Doch or Sicily with Day covering mids and backs and Fogarty covering forwards.
2. Macrae or Butters with Sheezel and Day covering all 3 positions. No ruck cover but 1 trade to cover that.

I feel that Doch and Sicily are more likely to score better but the cover feels more complete with a fwd.
I would do what's best for your on field score over bench cover, especially given we are late in the season, have rolling lockout and you have trades to help cover a late out.
Having a premium on the bench could help for looping but you have to have a bit fall your way for that to work out, its not like you have an easy option to loop like a rookie.

I would look to get Neale of the field or trading him. LDU, Brouch, Libba, Steele are all good options.
 
Joined
17 Mar 2022
Messages
308
Likes
1,263
AFL Club
Fremantle
I would do what's best for your on field score over bench cover, especially given we are late in the season, have rolling lockout and you have trades to help cover a late out.
Having a premium on the bench could help for looping but you have to have a bit fall your way for that to work out, its not like you have an easy option to loop like a rookie.

I would look to get Neale of the field or trading him. LDU, Brouch, Libba, Steele are all good options.
I looked at getting rid of Neale. One of the benefits of the 23rd premium would be getting Neale off if the others perform (Lions last game this week).

@vsberlina I hadn't thought of Flanders, I'll look into him.
 

Darkie

Leadership Group
Joined
12 Apr 2014
Messages
25,375
Likes
65,405
AFL Club
Collingwood
Sheezel outperforming Macrae and Butters in 3 & 5 Rd AVGs. Dunno if they're an improvement.

Doc might give you an opportunity to loop with Day (if Mullin plays after one of them). Doc also DPP.

Sicily not DPP, but likely doesn't matter as you have others to change position.
But given he's also a Hawk, doesn't let you loop with Day.

But yes, a FOR option would give better coverage and double loop possibility. Flanders?
I went with Flanders last week myself. Only 32% CBAs, which was less than I would have hoped, but he had 32 touches, which was excellent. Touk’s CBAs will be going begging this week as well, if that’s a concern.
 
Joined
10 Sep 2020
Messages
2,716
Likes
6,784
AFL Club
Collingwood
I went with Flanders last week myself. Only 32% CBAs, which was less than I would have hoped, but he had 32 touches, which was excellent. Touk’s CBAs will be going begging this week as well, if that’s a concern.
Low CBAs but getting the ball. I don't see a problem. Touk suspended, so he could do better (unless Touk was feeding him?). I don't watch games so have no idea other than the trend is a friend.
Neale playing poorly away and has an away game. Could be worth a punt to rotate them or even try and loop for the remainder of the season.
Got me thinking now. Might be worth me using my last two trades.
 
Joined
13 Jun 2022
Messages
5,214
Likes
17,221
AFL Club
St Kilda
There's a story to that, I was booted out of the 5 top leagues, so I imagine you were competing in the strongest leagues. Hence I look like a star, when in fact I've had an average team all year. lol
Definitely some strong leagues here, I didn't even make top 8 in most of them, I'll look fwd to getting booted out of them next year :LOL:
 
Top