Discussion 2024: AFL RDT Dream Team Discussion
- Thread starter Tex
- Start date
View attachment 60125
5th for the week, do I win a piece of Chicken stuffed into a KFC sock or something?
5th for the week, do I win a piece of Chicken stuffed into a KFC sock or something?
Nice Dazza, 2681 here, won all my league matches and in my own league where I was sitting 8th, I'm now 9th...stoked!
Last edited:
View attachment 60125
5th for the week, do I win a piece of Chicken stuffed into a KFC sock or something?
5th for the week, do I win a piece of Chicken stuffed into a KFC sock or something?
Looking at a 23rd premium (to send Day or Sheezel to the bench). Chesser and Maric out.
I can afford anyone (with 2 trades) so it's either:
1. Doch or Sicily with Day covering mids and backs and Fogarty covering forwards.
2. Macrae or Butters with Sheezel and Day covering all 3 positions. No ruck cover but 1 trade to cover that.
I feel that Doch and Sicily are more likely to score better but the cover feels more complete with a fwd.
I can afford anyone (with 2 trades) so it's either:
1. Doch or Sicily with Day covering mids and backs and Fogarty covering forwards.
2. Macrae or Butters with Sheezel and Day covering all 3 positions. No ruck cover but 1 trade to cover that.
I feel that Doch and Sicily are more likely to score better but the cover feels more complete with a fwd.
Sheezel outperforming Macrae and Butters in 3 & 5 Rd AVGs. Dunno if they're an improvement.
Doc might give you an opportunity to loop with Day (if Mullin plays after one of them). Doc also DPP.
Sicily not DPP, but likely doesn't matter as you have others to change position.
But given he's also a Hawk, doesn't let you loop with Day.
But yes, a FOR option would give better coverage and double loop possibility. Flanders?
Doc might give you an opportunity to loop with Day (if Mullin plays after one of them). Doc also DPP.
Sicily not DPP, but likely doesn't matter as you have others to change position.
But given he's also a Hawk, doesn't let you loop with Day.
But yes, a FOR option would give better coverage and double loop possibility. Flanders?
I would do what's best for your on field score over bench cover, especially given we are late in the season, have rolling lockout and you have trades to help cover a late out.
Having a premium on the bench could help for looping but you have to have a bit fall your way for that to work out, its not like you have an easy option to loop like a rookie.
I would look to get Neale of the field or trading him. LDU, Brouch, Libba, Steele are all good options.
Having a premium on the bench could help for looping but you have to have a bit fall your way for that to work out, its not like you have an easy option to loop like a rookie.
I would look to get Neale of the field or trading him. LDU, Brouch, Libba, Steele are all good options.
I looked at getting rid of Neale. One of the benefits of the 23rd premium would be getting Neale off if the others perform (Lions last game this week).
@vsberlina I hadn't thought of Flanders, I'll look into him.
@vsberlina I hadn't thought of Flanders, I'll look into him.
Low CBAs but getting the ball. I don't see a problem. Touk suspended, so he could do better (unless Touk was feeding him?). I don't watch games so have no idea other than the trend is a friend.
Neale playing poorly away and has an away game. Could be worth a punt to rotate them or even try and loop for the remainder of the season.
Got me thinking now. Might be worth me using my last two trades.
Neale playing poorly away and has an away game. Could be worth a punt to rotate them or even try and loop for the remainder of the season.
Got me thinking now. Might be worth me using my last two trades.
