Opinion 2024 AFL SuperCoach Planning Thread

Ben's Beasts

Leadership Group
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
19,081
Likes
80,369
AFL Club
Melbourne
So my summary from an SC perspective as far as any relevant midpricers or rookies go;

Melbourne

Billings - Did pretty much what you would want him to do as an owner. Decent role. Had 17 touches, used it well, kicked a goal and laid some tackles. Should be in contention for our forward lines if structure allows with the likes of Fyfe, Jordon and Harmes ✅

Windsor - Had a very good first half, used it well, kicked a couple of goals and was then rested for most of the last quarter. Looks good for a spot on field in our forward lines ✅

Laurie - 17 touches, didn’t do anything too flashy but looks okay for an average around 60. A decent bench option. JS a query but should string some games together ✅

Howes - Started well but then faded. I don’t think he will score particularly well and suspect his JS isn’t too flash ✖️

Schache - Was surprisingly decent but as a back-up ruck he was quite poor. Won just the one hit-out. Suspect his JS isn’t the best and scoring potential quite poor too ✖️

Carlton

Fantasia - Did some nice things but unlikely to score well enough in the small forward role and would appear to not be worth the elevated price tag either ✖️

Any of the other rookie priced players barely featured and are very unlikely for round 1 unless they are the sub.
 
Joined
9 Feb 2015
Messages
9,441
Likes
57,910
AFL Club
West Coast
From an observer at WCE training today re Harley Reid’s injury:-

  • Harley Reid pulled up from a drill about half an hour in with some sort of minor issue (wasn’t showing any limp) and went to get some work done by a physio on the bench. After a brief fitness test he was right to go again, and did the rest of the session with the exception of the 10 minutes of skill work after the match play - looks like just a no-risk approach.
 
Joined
20 Mar 2016
Messages
1,397
Likes
4,836
Billings - Did pretty much what you would want him to do as an owner. Decent role. Had 17 touches, used it well, kicked a goal and laid some tackles. Should be in contention for our forward lines if structure allows with the likes of Fyfe, Jordon and Harmes ✅
It's actually a role I usually wouldn't go near, given there are no CBAs or cheap backline ball involved.

He has scored well playing that role in the past though to be fair. Very tough call whether he's worth squeezing in or not.
 
Joined
8 Aug 2022
Messages
239
Likes
791
AFL Club
Carlton
I reckon by the end of the pre-season games there will be a dozen players who could fit this bill. Going to be hard to decide...
Hope not as I got 3 of the 4.

Fyfe back in the guts and know what his body can handle and using footy iq good enough for me.

With Mills and now Parker out Jordan slides onto a wing.

Billings was clean tonight, had a decent role as the connector and finished.

With Smith out Harmes should get a gig

Be watching the games with interest this weekend but if Reid doesn't wow be easy to go down to Windsor and then up from Livingston to Naismith.
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,985
Likes
126,690
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
It's actually a role I usually wouldn't go near, given there are no CBAs or cheap backline ball involved.
But if he is attending or near stoppages around the ground, are these not more important than centre bounce attendances given no magic multipliers are added to a CBA and around the ground stoppages make up a greater portion of the match? With his style of play and price point, does a “CBA” really matter?

Do Melbourne rotate players from the wing into the stoppages or a forward takes the stoppage in the forward line, etc or does the CBA setup stay the same no matter the length between goals or quarters (if no goals are kicked)?
 
Joined
20 Mar 2016
Messages
1,397
Likes
4,836
But if he is attending or near stoppages around the ground, are these not more important than centre bounce attendances given no magic multipliers are added to a CBA and around the ground stoppages make up a greater portion of the match? With his style of play and price point, does a “CBA” really matter?

Do Melbourne rotate players from the wing into the stoppages or a forward takes the stoppage in the forward line, etc or does the CBA setup stay the same no matter the length between goals or quarters (if no goals are kicked)?
Very fair point - I guess CBAs generally just give you that extra bit of insurance in addition to around the ground stoppages don’t they?

I just worry there might be games where he doesn’t get near it and throws up a 30-odd I suppose, but yeah you would think an 80+ average is very achievable for him otherwise (y)
 
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
6,769
Likes
14,766
AFL Club
Fremantle
So my summary from an SC perspective as far as any relevant midpricers or rookies go;

Melbourne

Billings - Did pretty much what you would want him to do as an owner. Decent role. Had 17 touches, used it well, kicked a goal and laid some tackles. Should be in contention for our forward lines if structure allows with the likes of Fyfe, Jordon and Harmes ✅

Windsor - Had a very good first half, used it well, kicked a couple of goals and was then rested for most of the last quarter. Looks good for a spot on field in our forward lines ✅

Laurie - 17 touches, didn’t do anything too flashy but looks okay for an average around 60. A decent bench option. JS a query but should string some games together ✅

Howes - Started well but then faded. I don’t think he will score particularly well and suspect his JS isn’t too flash ✖️

Schache - Was surprisingly decent but as a back-up ruck he was quite poor. Won just the one hit-out. Suspect his JS isn’t the best and scoring potential quite poor too ✖️

Carlton

Fantasia - Did some nice things but unlikely to score well enough in the small forward role and would appear to not be worth the elevated price tag either ✖️

Any of the other rookie priced players barely featured and are very unlikely for round 1 unless they are the sub.
Have they leapfrogged into your team for the moment Ben.
 
Joined
28 Sep 2020
Messages
717
Likes
3,322
AFL Club
Essendon
So my summary from an SC perspective as far as any relevant midpricers or rookies go;

Melbourne

Billings - Did pretty much what you would want him to do as an owner. Decent role. Had 17 touches, used it well, kicked a goal and laid some tackles. Should be in contention for our forward lines if structure allows with the likes of Fyfe, Jordon and Harmes ✅

Windsor - Had a very good first half, used it well, kicked a couple of goals and was then rested for most of the last quarter. Looks good for a spot on field in our forward lines ✅

Laurie - 17 touches, didn’t do anything too flashy but looks okay for an average around 60. A decent bench option. JS a query but should string some games together ✅

Howes - Started well but then faded. I don’t think he will score particularly well and suspect his JS isn’t too flash ✖️

Schache - Was surprisingly decent but as a back-up ruck he was quite poor. Won just the one hit-out. Suspect his JS isn’t the best and scoring potential quite poor too ✖️

Carlton

Fantasia - Did some nice things but unlikely to score well enough in the small forward role and would appear to not be worth the elevated price tag either ✖️

Any of the other rookie priced players barely featured and are very unlikely for round 1 unless they are the sub.
Great little summary of rookie priced players, thanks for sharing.

Was Windsor playing on a wing?
 
Top