Discussion BBL|14: Preseason Discussion | OPEN!
- Thread starter Tamuhawk
- Start date
- Status
Wasn't he suggesting
/ Harper (E)
/ Inglis (E)
Then depending on Game 1 scores swing Doran , Philippe & Flex around
eg
Philippe could go to WK 1 if Harper scores less than Inglis
Doran onfield Bat line to take Inglis score if acceptable (more than Harper)
Then move 1 of Short/Overton/Sutherland/Fraser-McGurk to Flex
/ Harper (E)
/ Inglis (E)
Then depending on Game 1 scores swing Doran , Philippe & Flex around
eg
Philippe could go to WK 1 if Harper scores less than Inglis
Doran onfield Bat line to take Inglis score if acceptable (more than Harper)
Then move 1 of Short/Overton/Sutherland/Fraser-McGurk to Flex
Last edited:
MR v MS Practice match today scorecard
https://live.nvplay.com/au?tab=m_scorecard#m0ca49be0-5cb4-42c6-adc7-149852d1260d
https://live.nvplay.com/au?tab=m_scorecard#m0ca49be0-5cb4-42c6-adc7-149852d1260d
Last edited:
Thanks Herbie, if the Stars bat first I'll be reconsidering who I'm playing, if that performance is repeated on Sunday their bowlers might not have much to bowl at. Their three top scores were from bowlers, perhaps they should have their bowlers batting first.
Encouraging performances from Brown, Seifert, Khan, Sutherland and MacKenzie with his batting. All up fairly much confirms my assessments of the players before this match.
Encouraging performances from Brown, Seifert, Khan, Sutherland and MacKenzie with his batting. All up fairly much confirms my assessments of the players before this match.
The Renegades were more interesting than the Stars in that one. Lined up pretty much exactly as I said 2-3 weeks ago. Just didn’t have Khan there as he hadn’t been signed by that stage.
The stars are a mystery still to me as they played 7 specialist bowlers. Giving them all a run brings us no closer to figuring out how they divvy up the overs.
The stars are a mystery still to me as they played 7 specialist bowlers. Giving them all a run brings us no closer to figuring out how they divvy up the overs.
MR look like (to me at least) it will be Harvey/Wells or Stow for that 11th spot.
5 specialist bowlers doesn't help Hassan & Sutherland's overs though , Game 2 could change from Game 1 though.
Milne not playing doesn't help either.
Harper keeping might be telling (until Duckett arrives)
Wonder if their preference is :-
Maxwell (Clarke Game 1)
Rogers
Duckett (Harper until Duckett arrives)
Stoinis
Cartwright
Curran
+ 5 Bowlers
1 bat short but without Webster is a Harper/Kelleway/Merlo going to do much at all ?
5 specialist bowlers doesn't help Hassan & Sutherland's overs though , Game 2 could change from Game 1 though.
Milne not playing doesn't help either.
Harper keeping might be telling (until Duckett arrives)
Wonder if their preference is :-
Maxwell (Clarke Game 1)
Rogers
Duckett (Harper until Duckett arrives)
Stoinis
Cartwright
Curran
+ 5 Bowlers
1 bat short but without Webster is a Harper/Kelleway/Merlo going to do much at all ?
If you think you have significant new information about role, I think it’s fine.
I’d be reluctant to do it based on your new assessment of form, unless it has changed dramatically … eg a batsman not being able to hit it off the square, and then coming out and smoking it from ball one.
A single delivery can change a batsman’s score, or how much a particular bowler bowls in a given game, pretty dramatically … it might be as little as a catch dropped or taken. I’d be wary of overreacting if it is potentially down to a small margin like that.
I’d be reluctant to do it based on your new assessment of form, unless it has changed dramatically … eg a batsman not being able to hit it off the square, and then coming out and smoking it from ball one.
A single delivery can change a batsman’s score, or how much a particular bowler bowls in a given game, pretty dramatically … it might be as little as a catch dropped or taken. I’d be wary of overreacting if it is potentially down to a small margin like that.
- Status