Discussion BBL|14 Teams & In Game Discussion: GW 8 - ALL GAMES 6:30pm AEST STARTS
- Thread starter KLo30
- Start date
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 19,503
- Likes
- 82,810
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
656 (Stoinis)
So glad that Stoinis got a bowl. Philippe really poor.
Some great scores in my XI from Rogers, Dorff, Zampa, Warner and Renshaw but also some poor scores from Bethell, Green, Philippe and Agar.
On to next round where I feel that bringing in Sutherland is a priority along with a couple of ‘Canes.
So glad that Stoinis got a bowl. Philippe really poor.
Some great scores in my XI from Rogers, Dorff, Zampa, Warner and Renshaw but also some poor scores from Bethell, Green, Philippe and Agar.
On to next round where I feel that bringing in Sutherland is a priority along with a couple of ‘Canes.
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2014
- Messages
- 1,165
- Likes
- 5,006
- AFL Club
- Essendon
819(Warner)
Couldn't have asked for a much better game to end the round, Maxwell 113, new recruit Abbott with 99, new recruit Webster 59 and Edwards with a respectable 48. Was counting on Brown to play to get 11 because of having 4 canes, so very thankful that I could not only hold pace but potentially have a good rank improvement.
Warner 140(vc)
Rogers 119
Maxwell 113
Abbott 99
Zampa 87
Johnson 81
Webster 59
Allen 49
Edwards 48
Agar 24
Couldn't have asked for a much better game to end the round, Maxwell 113, new recruit Abbott with 99, new recruit Webster 59 and Edwards with a respectable 48. Was counting on Brown to play to get 11 because of having 4 canes, so very thankful that I could not only hold pace but potentially have a good rank improvement.
Warner 140(vc)
Rogers 119
Maxwell 113
Abbott 99
Zampa 87
Johnson 81
Webster 59
Allen 49
Edwards 48
Agar 24
Last edited:
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 39,295
- Likes
- 127,816
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
812 with Edwards as C. Thunder inclusions did not go as planned when the likes of Richardson, etc were under consideration as alternatives. Ended up fielding Harper over Davies which I would have preferred to avoid if Walter was available or if a washout was avoided. Renegades bowlers excellent along with new recruit Neser and solid from the Sixers and Stars.
649 (Stoinis)
Sutherland 166
Dorff 99
Christian 83
Warner 70
Stoinis 57x2
Edwards 48
Billings 20
Philippe 18
Patterson 18
Green 10
Bethell 3
Connolly 2
Real round of two halves. Sams injury really hurt because I elected to hedge by using all three trades on Thunder (Warner and DC were my second and third choices, so that actually worked out pretty well). Unfortunately pretty much every other alternative trade in also went well so most people will be set up a trade ahead of me for upcoming rounds and won't have lost points as a result.
Sutherland 166
Dorff 99
Christian 83
Warner 70
Stoinis 57x2
Edwards 48
Billings 20
Philippe 18
Patterson 18
Green 10
Bethell 3
Connolly 2
Real round of two halves. Sams injury really hurt because I elected to hedge by using all three trades on Thunder (Warner and DC were my second and third choices, so that actually worked out pretty well). Unfortunately pretty much every other alternative trade in also went well so most people will be set up a trade ahead of me for upcoming rounds and won't have lost points as a result.
- Joined
- 25 Dec 2022
- Messages
- 3,535
- Likes
- 17,485
- AFL Club
- West Coast
779 Edwards
Stoinis 57
Edwards C 48x2
Stoinis great with the ball today after his first failure with the bat. Edwards did well in the bowling innings and had a great opportunity to make a quick 20 but fell for 9. Would’ve been incredibly handy. Still not happy about his dismissal. Wasn’t all that conclusive and I’m a fan of “benefit of the doubt goes to the batter”, but there’s every chance my Edwards captaincy tinted glasses were swaying me to that conclusion!
The Edwards v Stoinis captaincy choice only cost 9 points. The real jackpot would’ve been if I went through with Sutherland.
Feel like it’s an above average score. Good for the top 10/20/50/100/etc. hopes, but took a hit in the 1st overall aspirations as I see @Dravid with a mammoth 916! So I’ll be a minimum of 137 (was 66) behind 1st overall since we were tied for 5th. Well done mate! Don’t want to go the early crow but I’d assume you’d be number 1 and probably have some cushion too.
Stoinis 57
Edwards C 48x2
Stoinis great with the ball today after his first failure with the bat. Edwards did well in the bowling innings and had a great opportunity to make a quick 20 but fell for 9. Would’ve been incredibly handy. Still not happy about his dismissal. Wasn’t all that conclusive and I’m a fan of “benefit of the doubt goes to the batter”, but there’s every chance my Edwards captaincy tinted glasses were swaying me to that conclusion!
The Edwards v Stoinis captaincy choice only cost 9 points. The real jackpot would’ve been if I went through with Sutherland.
Feel like it’s an above average score. Good for the top 10/20/50/100/etc. hopes, but took a hit in the 1st overall aspirations as I see @Dravid with a mammoth 916! So I’ll be a minimum of 137 (was 66) behind 1st overall since we were tied for 5th. Well done mate! Don’t want to go the early crow but I’d assume you’d be number 1 and probably have some cushion too.
780 (Ferguson)
12 SI @ 65.0 (53.9 season)
Happy with that score considering I had 5 Thunders, 3 Hurricanes and Curran MIA meant I had the bare XI playing.
Decided to take on the rain with my trades in the opening game of the round which hamstrung my team in the end but not a complete disaster.
Great to see a core group of SCS coaches at the pointy end and doing well this round. Exciting times ahead for the remaining third of the season.
12 SI @ 65.0 (53.9 season)
Happy with that score considering I had 5 Thunders, 3 Hurricanes and Curran MIA meant I had the bare XI playing.
Decided to take on the rain with my trades in the opening game of the round which hamstrung my team in the end but not a complete disaster.
Great to see a core group of SCS coaches at the pointy end and doing well this round. Exciting times ahead for the remaining third of the season.