Starting to see a lot of people trying to poke holes in some of the absolute guns of the comp eg Fyfe Danger and Cripps. You can poke holes and try and find a reason why almost any of these top players should/shouldn't be good picks but at the end of the day if you want to build a club from the ground up you're picking fyfe over ed curnow. Same logic applies in supercoach more often than not the best players in the comp are the best in supercoach. Maybe we're overthinking these issues of danger's age, fyfe moving forward and cripps' inconsistencies because the options below these guys you can question a lot more. I will say though this is supercoach and anything can happen but I won't be stressing about picking these guys in my starting team.... until they ping a hammy in round 2 haha.
Of the two, Bont is far more likely to explode and have a Brownlow winning, career defining, 125 ave year. When in doubt, pick the better player...