Realistically which option is better in the long run
Fyfe + rookie + rookie
Vs
Libba + sheed + Moore
Personally I’m not worried about initial keepers more about points
If in the first 6 rounds they average (tell me if you think this is unreasonable) do you think a rookie can average 70?
Fyfe 120 + rookie 70 + rookie 70 = 190 x 6 = 1140 (inconsistent scores throughout due to rookies, but a keeper)
Sheed 95 + Libba 85 + Moore 80 = 190 x 6 =1140 (More consistent)
Fyfe + rookie + rookie
Vs
Libba + sheed + Moore
Personally I’m not worried about initial keepers more about points
If in the first 6 rounds they average (tell me if you think this is unreasonable) do you think a rookie can average 70?
Fyfe 120 + rookie 70 + rookie 70 = 190 x 6 = 1140 (inconsistent scores throughout due to rookies, but a keeper)
Sheed 95 + Libba 85 + Moore 80 = 190 x 6 =1140 (More consistent)
Where you say: MP + MP + CPR* or Fyfe + R70 + R70, when you look at the equation it's like you are looking at top end Rookies. In reality, you already have those top end Rookies, so your R70's are actually something like the 13th and 14th Rookies in your team, not the 1st and 2nd. Even though the 13th/14th won't be on the field, it is those "worrying" last picked Rookies that belong in that equation, as they are actually the ones replacing those MP's and CPR* in your team, and are very unlikely to score 70's.
Under that scenario, keep the MP's and the CPR*.
*CPR = Cheap Psuedo Rookie