Opinion Questions For Rowsus
- Thread starter Rowsus
- Start date
- Status
Hey Juzzo,
when you are running out of trades early, like you and I both are, building DPP links is very important. I like your trades as they build links, and are bringing in players that are value for money. That's the other important thing for us trade poor players! Good job.
when you are running out of trades early, like you and I both are, building DPP links is very important. I like your trades as they build links, and are bringing in players that are value for money. That's the other important thing for us trade poor players! Good job.
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 1,292
- Likes
- 268
hi row
my defence contains the following players: shaw, newes, hibberd, ox, Hamling, hodge, Edwards, a pearce.
I am looking to trade out ox for a premium defender I was thinking of simpson, bob murphy or Enright or someone else that I have thought of. I was wondering who is the best defender for their price and value going around? thanks
my defence contains the following players: shaw, newes, hibberd, ox, Hamling, hodge, Edwards, a pearce.
I am looking to trade out ox for a premium defender I was thinking of simpson, bob murphy or Enright or someone else that I have thought of. I was wondering who is the best defender for their price and value going around? thanks
Last edited:
Hey mate, if you get a chance can you check out my team.
I have 7 trades and 309k in the bank.
im Thinking Crippa - Armitage as a pretty big POD and for the second trade i can go:
Mckenzie - a def around 447k
or i could move mckenzie to mids and trade boston - someone under 498k
i will most likely trade boston if Mckenzie is playing this week.
who do you think i should trade in?
would love any thoughts
thanks mate
I have 7 trades and 309k in the bank.
im Thinking Crippa - Armitage as a pretty big POD and for the second trade i can go:
Mckenzie - a def around 447k
or i could move mckenzie to mids and trade boston - someone under 498k
i will most likely trade boston if Mckenzie is playing this week.
who do you think i should trade in?
would love any thoughts
thanks mate
Last edited:
I might be stuck with loopholing a rookie at M8. Obviously this isn't ideal, but here is my situation.
I have 4 trades left, with only a mid upgrade to do. This shouldn't be hard, but I really want Gaz. And it looks like he won't be as cheap as I expected.
My rookies are Boston, Steele, Boekhorst and De Goey (Lambert in fwd line). None of them really fill you with confidence going forward.
I guess the other option for me is to forget about Gaz and get someone who is cheaper and save 2 trades. If I did, I could possibly upgrade Selwood to someone who isn't pathetic.
Here is the option summarized:
Gaz + Selwood vs JPK + Cotchin. (both leave me with no trades)
Thoughts?
I have 4 trades left, with only a mid upgrade to do. This shouldn't be hard, but I really want Gaz. And it looks like he won't be as cheap as I expected.
My rookies are Boston, Steele, Boekhorst and De Goey (Lambert in fwd line). None of them really fill you with confidence going forward.
I guess the other option for me is to forget about Gaz and get someone who is cheaper and save 2 trades. If I did, I could possibly upgrade Selwood to someone who isn't pathetic.
Here is the option summarized:
Gaz + Selwood vs JPK + Cotchin. (both leave me with no trades)
Thoughts?
- Joined
- 31 Mar 2014
- Messages
- 2,909
- Likes
- 2,122
- AFL Club
- Brisbane
Hi Row, hope you're enjoying your first few days back in Oz.
I posted this in trade thread but would love your opinion too. Thanks in advance!
Some advice please. I have 6 trades left and am moving Cripps to Armitage this week. It leaves me no cash and probably 1 upgrade in Oxley, however I can keep rotating him with Lumumba/Hamling.
I wonder if it's a smart move to trade Dale to Steele and free up $50k? Would allow me to move Oxley to a cheaper premo def next week, eg Gibson, leaving me with 3 trades. Or do I keep the trade (and have 5 in the bank), miss out on Steele, and ride the 3 way D6 wave!
Or do I miss Armitage and get a $400k mid? With Selwood/Wines I feel like I need a good mid to finish off rather than a risk like Rock or hot/cold like Lewis/Sidey.
Thoughts appreciated, team linked.
EDIT: Hi Rowsus, i changed my mind and went Oxley to Rance and Dale to Steele. Leaves me 4 trades, $105k. Cripps shouldn't lose money and next week i turn Cripps into best available, probably still Armitage but maybe Rocky. Sound okay?
I posted this in trade thread but would love your opinion too. Thanks in advance!
Some advice please. I have 6 trades left and am moving Cripps to Armitage this week. It leaves me no cash and probably 1 upgrade in Oxley, however I can keep rotating him with Lumumba/Hamling.
I wonder if it's a smart move to trade Dale to Steele and free up $50k? Would allow me to move Oxley to a cheaper premo def next week, eg Gibson, leaving me with 3 trades. Or do I keep the trade (and have 5 in the bank), miss out on Steele, and ride the 3 way D6 wave!
Or do I miss Armitage and get a $400k mid? With Selwood/Wines I feel like I need a good mid to finish off rather than a risk like Rock or hot/cold like Lewis/Sidey.
Thoughts appreciated, team linked.
EDIT: Hi Rowsus, i changed my mind and went Oxley to Rance and Dale to Steele. Leaves me 4 trades, $105k. Cripps shouldn't lose money and next week i turn Cripps into best available, probably still Armitage but maybe Rocky. Sound okay?
Last edited:
Hi Row, I posted this in Round 15 trades thread also.
With 3 trades left is it madness to do 2 this week?
Comments appreciated
CEY to Rocky
Pearce to Maynard
I'll have a complete forward line and ruck with McKernan as backup (when martin returns)
Complete mid with poor backup
Awful defence with poor backup
Plenty of dpps to work with
Back: Laird, Yeo M/D, Simmo, Geary, B Smith, J Lever. Hambling, Adamson M/D
Mid: Fyfe, Pendles, Danger, Murphy, Selwood, Wines, Sidey, Rocky. Kav, Lambert M/F, Maynard M/D
Ruck: Blic, Martin. Read R/F
For: Martin M/F, Gray M/F, Swan M/F, Harvey M/F, Smith, Bonts M/F. Dale, McKernan R/F
Remaining salary $100
Thanks
PS I think Kav and Hambling out this week.
With 3 trades left is it madness to do 2 this week?
Comments appreciated
CEY to Rocky
Pearce to Maynard
I'll have a complete forward line and ruck with McKernan as backup (when martin returns)
Complete mid with poor backup
Awful defence with poor backup
Plenty of dpps to work with
Back: Laird, Yeo M/D, Simmo, Geary, B Smith, J Lever. Hambling, Adamson M/D
Mid: Fyfe, Pendles, Danger, Murphy, Selwood, Wines, Sidey, Rocky. Kav, Lambert M/F, Maynard M/D
Ruck: Blic, Martin. Read R/F
For: Martin M/F, Gray M/F, Swan M/F, Harvey M/F, Smith, Bonts M/F. Dale, McKernan R/F
Remaining salary $100
Thanks
PS I think Kav and Hambling out this week.
Last edited:
Hey J44,
Armitage is in over 5% of teams, maybe over 6% after this week, which represents a decent but not large POD.
Looking at a break up of his scores we get:
Wins - 129, 134, 134, 79, 154 - 5/630 - Ave 126, Ave without lowest score 138
Losses - 77, 139, 108, 137, 111, 101, 101, 104 - 8/878 - Ave 109.7, Ave without 2 lowest scores 116
Only one score in wins below 129, only 2 scores in losses above 111. It really points to he needs to play in winning sides to average 110+, and while they have improved, they might only win 2 or 3 more games, possibly less. He's well priced, for what he has produced so far, but it could probably turn out to be, you are just getting what you are paying for. Getting what you are paying for in SC sometimes is good enough.
I would probably go Boston to Murphy R, there's not a lot of reliable Defs left under $450k.
Armitage is in over 5% of teams, maybe over 6% after this week, which represents a decent but not large POD.
Looking at a break up of his scores we get:
Wins - 129, 134, 134, 79, 154 - 5/630 - Ave 126, Ave without lowest score 138
Losses - 77, 139, 108, 137, 111, 101, 101, 104 - 8/878 - Ave 109.7, Ave without 2 lowest scores 116
Only one score in wins below 129, only 2 scores in losses above 111. It really points to he needs to play in winning sides to average 110+, and while they have improved, they might only win 2 or 3 more games, possibly less. He's well priced, for what he has produced so far, but it could probably turn out to be, you are just getting what you are paying for. Getting what you are paying for in SC sometimes is good enough.
I would probably go Boston to Murphy R, there's not a lot of reliable Defs left under $450k.
I think you will get what you are paying for, and depending on the role you are hoping to fill, he could be a good pick, or a slightly disappointing pick. By that I mean, if you think he will M7/8 in your team, he will be a good pick, if you are hoping he will be M4 in your team, there a pretty reasonable chance you might be disappointed, but only a little.
Hi ****,
yes, it's been good so far. All a bit of a blur!
I'm must admit, I'm not in love with Oxley to Rance. While it only costs a little, dollar-wise, it does cost a trade, and I think you might only improve your score by 8 to 10/week. It means you might end up with less than 100 points for your trade. It's not very much, given a trade up your sleeve, and a late season injury to say a Beams, could get you a lot more than 100 points. If you can't justify getting Shaw or Laird, or want extra cash down the track, and don't want to stretch to Murphy or even possibly Ibbo, I'd be tempted to just sit on Oxley, and save the trade for now.
yes, it's been good so far. All a bit of a blur!
I'm must admit, I'm not in love with Oxley to Rance. While it only costs a little, dollar-wise, it does cost a trade, and I think you might only improve your score by 8 to 10/week. It means you might end up with less than 100 points for your trade. It's not very much, given a trade up your sleeve, and a late season injury to say a Beams, could get you a lot more than 100 points. If you can't justify getting Shaw or Laird, or want extra cash down the track, and don't want to stretch to Murphy or even possibly Ibbo, I'd be tempted to just sit on Oxley, and save the trade for now.
Last edited:
- Status