Round 14: Teams, In Game & Cancelled Ade/Gee Scoring Discussions - Best 18 Scoring
- Thread starter Matt
- Start date
I think it will be zero
The terms and conditions for the game state
Each week, participants choose 22 players whose contribution to a participant's SuperCoach score is based on the player's real-life performance in that week's AFL round as assessed by Champion Data Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 090641553.
The words real-life are pretty clear
The terms and conditions for the game state
Each week, participants choose 22 players whose contribution to a participant's SuperCoach score is based on the player's real-life performance in that week's AFL round as assessed by Champion Data Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 090641553.
The words real-life are pretty clear
- Joined
- 29 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 996
- Likes
- 75
- AFL Club
- Essendon
That's why I reckon do average or projected, ban making these players captains, neglect the projected score from the price movements. It's not going to be fair to anyone either way but this is the most fair. I bet their will be a bloke in the top 10 who would loose any hope of the 50k if donuts were given out. 55 for Brodie is stiff, 133 for Danger is generous. Take the good with the bad and cop an at worst 50 point loss. If donuts were given it could completely throw out weeks of planning due to unforeseeable circumstances. Average is by fair the "fairest" and will some people slight advantages and disadvantages only.
Also, Virtual sports want to continue engage their participants and supporter base. Throwing out a handful of donuts could definatley throw people off. This is why I reckon they will go with averages or something like that. Just my hunch, but could easily go either way.
Bit pointless thinking about it but it's a good way to procrastinate from doing actual work.
Also, Virtual sports want to continue engage their participants and supporter base. Throwing out a handful of donuts could definatley throw people off. This is why I reckon they will go with averages or something like that. Just my hunch, but could easily go either way.
Bit pointless thinking about it but it's a good way to procrastinate from doing actual work.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 14 May 2015
- Messages
- 2,048
- Likes
- 1,281
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I would be very irritated if they just gave out "extra" points which players had not earned. That to me is ridiculous. Totally removes the somewhat "random" element where players can go big / be injured / be late withdrawals. We face crazy scenarios all the time. Why aren't all late omissions given their average? etc. People with dangerfield (me) can just name him C if our VC sucks and have a guaranteed decent VC score.
I would have thought trades and emergencies were meant to cater to unforseen circumstances. Really annoys me when good planning goes unrewarded. I don't mean planning to have crows / cats out, planning in the sense that you trade wisely to have SOME bench cover on every line.
I would have thought trades and emergencies were meant to cater to unforseen circumstances. Really annoys me when good planning goes unrewarded. I don't mean planning to have crows / cats out, planning in the sense that you trade wisely to have SOME bench cover on every line.
Over the summer I played in the Fantasy BigBash comp (I think this is done by Virtual Sports)
Pretty interesting that I have seen them backflip on their own rules.
At the start of the season it clearly stated that points for run outs were awarded to the player who was the final fielder in assisting the runout.
After a few games I started noticing that they weren't actually giving the points correctly and after I contacted them about the issue they said that the rules were written incorrectly!
Because SuperCoach is an older comp and therefore probably better run, I can't see the same happening but just some food for thought and suggests that perhaps the rules can be changed midseason.
Pretty interesting that I have seen them backflip on their own rules.
At the start of the season it clearly stated that points for run outs were awarded to the player who was the final fielder in assisting the runout.
After a few games I started noticing that they weren't actually giving the points correctly and after I contacted them about the issue they said that the rules were written incorrectly!
Because SuperCoach is an older comp and therefore probably better run, I can't see the same happening but just some food for thought and suggests that perhaps the rules can be changed midseason.
