Strategy Round 2: Trades
- Thread starter IDIG
- Start date
I think you’re assessing it in the right way. The two big factors seem to be the likelihood of you “needing” those 3 trades next week versus the likelihood of potentially regretting whatever trade you make this week to facilitate the 3 over 2 rounds.
Berry “only” scored 59 so I wouldn’t think he’s a must at this stage, albeit I gather his role was good. Both have some JS threats, albeit Harmes out may assist.
Unless you have your eye on a specific third trade, I probably wouldn’t feel compelled to do one of them this round.
If you wanted to trade a failing pick out (let’s just say a Cripps type - although I plan to hold him), you can always do Cripps to Jordon ... ie you can actually fulfil 4 needs with 2 trades, so long as it’s 2 you need to get in and 2 you need to get out.
Berry “only” scored 59 so I wouldn’t think he’s a must at this stage, albeit I gather his role was good. Both have some JS threats, albeit Harmes out may assist.
Unless you have your eye on a specific third trade, I probably wouldn’t feel compelled to do one of them this round.
If you wanted to trade a failing pick out (let’s just say a Cripps type - although I plan to hold him), you can always do Cripps to Jordon ... ie you can actually fulfil 4 needs with 2 trades, so long as it’s 2 you need to get in and 2 you need to get out.
I preferred your Mitchell option personally, but both trade ins look like good options.
So does that trade someone in, then trade the person you traded in to someone else really work? I thought once Danger had played your trade was locked in!
So does that trade someone in, then trade the person you traded in to someone else really work? I thought once Danger had played your trade was locked in!
Need to look at Hickey , Jordon , S Martin , McDonald , Warner & L Young this round + I might find myself a value M8 already.
Or since I backed my 4 rookie Rucks from the start , I ride them all the way.
Cheers , I am sure the SC gods will realise I am not worthy of that ranking , so will quickly be down to about 60,000 th soon enough 😀
I did enjoy my ranking of 60 though.
Just worried (already) about some of my bench rookies not generating enough $$$ , so I guess just have to cross that bridge when it comes.
I did enjoy my ranking of 60 though.
Just worried (already) about some of my bench rookies not generating enough $$$ , so I guess just have to cross that bridge when it comes.
All week I was going to trade Grundy to free up cash to upgrade Rowell to Titch,but at the last minute decided not to.Decided to keep Gawndy because I find it a real headache wasting trades to upgrade Ruckmen,and wanted set and forget.
It’s only taken 10 years of Supercoaching to resist making impulsive decisions.
Having said that, Neale could be on the chopping block this week.
Now I’m limited by cash (Rowell),as to who I can trade in. Trying to decide between B. Smith and Sloane.
Despite his durability issues, I think I’ve settled on Sloane,( need a bigger sample size from Smith) who is 20k cheaper than Rowell. Has a high ceiling,but can also put in an average one. Trying to stick to the buy low ,sell high mantra.
Next week Neale becomes Titch and pocket 100k,happy days !
In theory anyway.
Thanks for listening/reading.
It’s only taken 10 years of Supercoaching to resist making impulsive decisions.
Having said that, Neale could be on the chopping block this week.
Now I’m limited by cash (Rowell),as to who I can trade in. Trying to decide between B. Smith and Sloane.
Despite his durability issues, I think I’ve settled on Sloane,( need a bigger sample size from Smith) who is 20k cheaper than Rowell. Has a high ceiling,but can also put in an average one. Trying to stick to the buy low ,sell high mantra.
Next week Neale becomes Titch and pocket 100k,happy days !
In theory anyway.
Thanks for listening/reading.
