Discussion SC 2021: Rookie Discussion
- Thread starter Brettthejett
- Start date
Fair enough , could miss out on Waterman's biggest price rise though as well delaying it a week.
Be interesting if he performs again next round how people try and get him in , probably too early trading a bench rookie to him.
I still think it would be easier to use Walker to go up to a premium , but if he keeps pumping out 125+ he might be a season long keeper himself.
I guess it will be a important decision to either hold/trade Walker & Ziebell at the right time
Be interesting if he performs again next round how people try and get him in , probably too early trading a bench rookie to him.
I still think it would be easier to use Walker to go up to a premium , but if he keeps pumping out 125+ he might be a season long keeper himself.
I guess it will be a important decision to either hold/trade Walker & Ziebell at the right time
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 4,890
- Likes
- 11,150
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Walker owners and their first world problems...
At least I'll make 20k dumping one of my spuds that haven't played 3 games for Waterman
At least I'll make 20k dumping one of my spuds that haven't played 3 games for Waterman
What has surprised me is the intercept players doing well, however, didn't allow for all the extra running and long quarters is seeing fast flowing movement from tired players. Eagles whilst dominant look spent a few times chasing down a running Port player (Gaff, Duggan, the endurance players).
Rowe could be on the chopping block, looking like the NM mid rookie who tonned up week one, gone by round 4.
Also, Waterman in winning side, lets say how he goes vs Swans. Did like his courage going back into pack to take a mark and goal. Round 5 looking like rookie inflow over round 4.
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 722
- Likes
- 2,250
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 722
- Likes
- 2,250
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Highmore to me seemed like an overreaction to the size of Essendon and then they didn't play Carlisle in defense. Ultimately they dropped Highmore so they could send Hill and Clark back to defense, Hill in particular was so badly exposed it lasted a half.
Throw in how gutless they were and the thrashing and there's a lot of reasons to see him come back in next week.
Bergman is a chance but not playing is such a big blow for the chances.
Sharp also probably an outside chance but unlikely.
Dow probably the only rookie priced guy who looks more likely than not to be dropped this week.
Chapman the bubble boy who looks really good. Giro probably still cheap enough thanks to the sub game to be right in the mix also.
Throw in how gutless they were and the thrashing and there's a lot of reasons to see him come back in next week.
Bergman is a chance but not playing is such a big blow for the chances.
Sharp also probably an outside chance but unlikely.
Dow probably the only rookie priced guy who looks more likely than not to be dropped this week.
Chapman the bubble boy who looks really good. Giro probably still cheap enough thanks to the sub game to be right in the mix also.
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 38,958
- Likes
- 126,614
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Chapman reasonable js short term, if the bombers keep their forward structure of Hooker, Stringer, Jones and Waterman, I believe Waterman could be a permanent fixture. Although I'm not sure where Peter Wright sits with ruck/forward responsibilities. Might leave it to bomber supporters for their view. Not sold on Dev, played well, but is he out when Jarrod Berry comes back, although Tommy Berry could make way too.