Competitions SCS Premier League Darts- World Championships - Tuesday 27th December @10:00pm AEDT
- Thread starter The Banker
- Start date
- Joined
- 24 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 4,380
- Likes
- 18,390
I've spent a lot of time on tables, more than I wanted to haha.
However what its told me about the scoring is we just need to pick the best method, not for what it presents from the Masters for the individual, but how it's going to improve collective scoring going forward. Just remember, where you are ranked this week doesn't necessarily mean it's where you will be ranked next. So I will present you with 1 more leaderboard. This is one without the minus legs and just scored at 1 leg win = 1 point
The Green % is increase in each individuals score on the last methods score. Again, this hasn't advantaged me, I'm again in the last 3 for increase. I'm just laying it out for you guys to decide how we play it out.
The only knock I see on this method is from a bonus points position, the 5 point bonus for Cullen seems quite low in comparison to the last table given the points have essentially doubled. There isn't a hell of a lot of reward to select and hold the winner at 5 points, however if it remains constant at 5 points (maybe 10 for the end of year champs) then it's a little cherry on top. Whilst the gap has widened to the bottom of the ladder, that end of the ladder has essentially caught up given their sharper rise in % increase. Maybe that keeps a lower weeks scores ticking along better. But it's a small data size.
In comparison I think the method on the previous page rewards efficiency, and the bonus.
The other thing to note and importantly, we can't mix and match. It's either how I rescored it using the method on the previous page, or how I have rescored it using this method. In other words, negative legs or no negative legs.
I've had enough of spreadsheets!! I'm hoping for some feedback as I see positives in both methods, and imo both are much fairer than what we had.
*Jay Sea jumps a couple of rungs, that was the only positional move (left him in last methods position)
However what its told me about the scoring is we just need to pick the best method, not for what it presents from the Masters for the individual, but how it's going to improve collective scoring going forward. Just remember, where you are ranked this week doesn't necessarily mean it's where you will be ranked next. So I will present you with 1 more leaderboard. This is one without the minus legs and just scored at 1 leg win = 1 point
The Green % is increase in each individuals score on the last methods score. Again, this hasn't advantaged me, I'm again in the last 3 for increase. I'm just laying it out for you guys to decide how we play it out.
The only knock I see on this method is from a bonus points position, the 5 point bonus for Cullen seems quite low in comparison to the last table given the points have essentially doubled. There isn't a hell of a lot of reward to select and hold the winner at 5 points, however if it remains constant at 5 points (maybe 10 for the end of year champs) then it's a little cherry on top. Whilst the gap has widened to the bottom of the ladder, that end of the ladder has essentially caught up given their sharper rise in % increase. Maybe that keeps a lower weeks scores ticking along better. But it's a small data size.
In comparison I think the method on the previous page rewards efficiency, and the bonus.
The other thing to note and importantly, we can't mix and match. It's either how I rescored it using the method on the previous page, or how I have rescored it using this method. In other words, negative legs or no negative legs.
I've had enough of spreadsheets!! I'm hoping for some feedback as I see positives in both methods, and imo both are much fairer than what we had.
*Jay Sea jumps a couple of rungs, that was the only positional move (left him in last methods position)
Last edited:
The one bit of advice I'd give you is, don't over think it too much.
*There will be problems and faults with any and every system.
*It's totally swings and round-a-bouts. What favored someone one week,will probably punish them the next.
*We're all playing the same game, under the same rules, so all you need is consistency in how they are applied.
*There will be problems and faults with any and every system.
*It's totally swings and round-a-bouts. What favored someone one week,will probably punish them the next.
*We're all playing the same game, under the same rules, so all you need is consistency in how they are applied.
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 38,960
- Likes
- 126,628
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 38,960
- Likes
- 126,628
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Joined
- 24 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 4,380
- Likes
- 18,390
Given the current ownership and captaincy selections for Price that have been disclosed, it feels time for a nine darter to be hit against James Wade, as there has been far too long of a break between drinks since we have witnessed him on the receiving end. What better time to do it than in Cardiff and to kick off the Premier League in fine fashion. 
Don't poke the bear, Wade’s current EO%
All teams have been submitted. Good luck
- Joined
- 24 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 4,380
- Likes
- 18,390
I have amended my entry to
Clayton (c)
Wright
MVG
Wade
I favour MVG over Anderson and on that basis, if I’m tipping that Anderson isn’t winning then why not roll the dice on Wade.
You poked the bear @Connoisseur 😂
Clayton (c)
Wright
MVG
Wade
I favour MVG over Anderson and on that basis, if I’m tipping that Anderson isn’t winning then why not roll the dice on Wade.
You poked the bear @Connoisseur 😂