Analysis SuperCoach Scoring Explained, Observations & Complaints On Scoring
- Thread starter I am Cursed :(
- Start date
Haha thanks. I'm just someone who's been watching the games and making little mental notes of what happens on the field and how it translates to the score updates. Once you accept the CD philosophy of hit outs being worthless but hitouts-to-advantage scoring well, everything else just falls into place from that.
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2014
- Messages
- 4,259
- Likes
- 7,602
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Brad in particular -4 last quarter after being heavily influential when the game was in the line. give me a fuc#ing spell.
Even his first 6 touches, 5 effective, 3 contested, 3 score involvements and 0 clangers for 16/15 scoring. That would be 30+ for Neale.
CD hate him it’s pretty evident this season.
Even his first 6 touches, 5 effective, 3 contested, 3 score involvements and 0 clangers for 16/15 scoring. That would be 30+ for Neale.
CD hate him it’s pretty evident this season.
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2014
- Messages
- 4,259
- Likes
- 7,602
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I don’t know if anyone really has Phillips but geez his score is pretty odd.
32 disposals (21 kicks)
11 contested as a winger
19 effective (55% DE)
2 goals 2 behinds
11 score involvements!
Most metres gained on the ground
4 marks
2 tackles
7 inside 50’s
3 rebound 50’s
2 clearances
7 clangers
123/64
He should obviously have been well less sc but 123/64 is ridiculous.
32 disposals (21 kicks)
11 contested as a winger
19 effective (55% DE)
2 goals 2 behinds
11 score involvements!
Most metres gained on the ground
4 marks
2 tackles
7 inside 50’s
3 rebound 50’s
2 clearances
7 clangers
123/64
He should obviously have been well less sc but 123/64 is ridiculous.
Another thing I've noticed is that contested possessions that do not lead to a disposal are not counted on the live stat sheets as a CP, but they are given points by CD. So if a player has a contested hard ball get and is immediately tackled causing a ball-up, they gain 3-4 points for that contested possession, but it is not recorded as a CP.
Just throwing this out there. Goals are undervalued in SC. Yes players get stats in the lead up (mark, free kick, tackle, kick) but i just don't think it's valued correctly. Maybe goals should be valued at 10 points and scaled when necessary.
Paddy Ryder with the first 2 goals is on less SC than Ryan (I own Ryan, so no bias). Ryder has given his team a flyer and has 2 kicks, 1 handball, 1 hit out and 2 goals (100% efficiency). Ryan 5 kicks, 1 handball, 2 marks, 1 tackle (100% efficiency). The bloke who has the 2 goals should be valued more than a couple more stats.
Anyway, just throwing it out there.
Paddy Ryder with the first 2 goals is on less SC than Ryan (I own Ryan, so no bias). Ryder has given his team a flyer and has 2 kicks, 1 handball, 1 hit out and 2 goals (100% efficiency). Ryan 5 kicks, 1 handball, 2 marks, 1 tackle (100% efficiency). The bloke who has the 2 goals should be valued more than a couple more stats.
Anyway, just throwing it out there.
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2014
- Messages
- 4,259
- Likes
- 7,602
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
While the idea seems fair, goal 'difficulty' is so subjective it would be impossible.
Or you go for the ham-fisted approach and have super goals...
Or you go for the ham-fisted approach and have super goals...
That way if you go 5pts for a goal in the square for example if it was uncontested they only get an uncontested possession with that, but if it was a free kick or contested mark then they get big points for the contested possession and mark/free kick in that scenario too.
I actually think that would be a great idea. Just have 7 zones, 6 inside 50 and 1 inside 50 with the middle zones worth the least.
As previously mentioned if they want to score on ‘impact’ etc in some of their scoring then they should do it for goal scoring too, which is the most important aspect of the game. An contested mark in the goal square and kicking the goal shouldn’t be worth the exact same points as an uncontested mark on the boundary 45 out and kicking a very difficult goal.
- Joined
- 22 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 7,882
- Likes
- 41,731
- AFL Club
- North Melb.
Just talking off the top of my head, but maybe difficulty isn't rewarded, but ease is "penalised".
A goal on the run from 45 out on the boundary might get full points, where as getting a joe-the-goose on the goal line might get watered down a little.
It's nearly the same as rewarding difficulty, but not quite.
A goal on the run from 45 out on the boundary might get full points, where as getting a joe-the-goose on the goal line might get watered down a little.
It's nearly the same as rewarding difficulty, but not quite.
Why do they "keep" so many points for scaling?
Larkey just took a contested mark, kick, goal for 6 SC points.
Yes, last minute of the match, and match was over, but why not give him full points, and have less points in the scaling basket?
Some player will get scaled up 8 or 10 points, for things he has already got full points for, why not give people their points, then scale the left-overs?
*disclaimer* - salty Larkin owner that wanted every point/dollar before trading him out this week!
Larkey just took a contested mark, kick, goal for 6 SC points.
Yes, last minute of the match, and match was over, but why not give him full points, and have less points in the scaling basket?
Some player will get scaled up 8 or 10 points, for things he has already got full points for, why not give people their points, then scale the left-overs?
*disclaimer* - salty Larkin owner that wanted every point/dollar before trading him out this week!
