@Ironhawk @Tamuhawk, I think you both read the edit and so on better than I do. To be honest I try not to, so as not to spoil it for myself 🙂
It was clear that Shay had no hope, but at times last night I thought Chrissy was in with a good shot. Obviously they tried to make it look that way, but she’d been brought into it from a few episodes out, rather than just at the final hurdle. She was also high profile from early on (albeit with a flat spot in the middle).
To me there are a few potential implications of this season’s outcome - particularly a 9-0-0 result:
- Pure social game players (eg Chrissy) are going to struggle. Personally I think they always do/should - a social game is often one that almost exclusively benefits yourself, rather than your alliance or tribe.
- Similarly, pure physical players are going to have to show more to be in with a good chance. Shay made an okay argument with what she had to work with, the issue was that she only had one real thing to work with. The jury clearly thought her 8/10 assessment was miles off the mark.
- Obvious endurance threats like Shay should probably be eliminated earlier. The final three actually reduces the prize for the winner of the final (endurance) challenge, but everyone knows what the challenge is broadly going to be, and she and Hayley absolutely dominated and were obviously likely to do so in advance. Josh may have won the whole thing if he’d cut her earlier - I think people will probably learn from that mistake. Josh vs Mark at the very end would have been interesting to watch.
- There’s a good chance that next season’s players will play a lot harder, given how emphatic the final result was. Two one-dimensional players got zero votes combined, so I think the logical conclusion is that next season’s players will need to be more rounded, and especially show more strategic play (which everyone can do - it’s not like there are physical limitations).