Great point Freo, you're definitely right Lloyd is often at the very back of the defence when he kicks, but even though I feel like that might explain why Lloyd is scaled up it doesn't explain why Laird is scaled down. This seems fairly inconsistent.
Laird this year had
11 effective kicks = 44
14 effective handballs = 21
6.2 marks = 12.4
0.15 goals per game = roughly 1.2
0.2 behinds per game = 0.2
2.15 tackles per game = 8.6
3.1 clangers = -12.4
9.95 contested possessions = 39.8
0.4 goal assists = 1.4
1.35 1%'s = 1.35
0.2 bounces = 0.2
8.95 intercepts = 17.8
=135.55 avg raw score + 1 point per effective kick out he had.............ended up with 108.2 average.
Lloyd had
13.8 effective kicks = 55.2
8.2 effective handballs = 12.3
6.48 marks = 12.96
0.13 goals per games = 1.2
0.13 behinds per game = 0.13
1.61 tackles per game = 6.44
2 clangers per game= -8
5.83 contested possessions per game= 23.32
0.13 Goal assists per game= 0.455
2.43 1%’s = 2.43
0.43 Bounces per game = 0.43
5.3 intercepts = 10.6
=117.46 avg raw score. +1 point per effective kick out he had......ended up with 110.6 average including finals (stats included that game)
As far as I'm aware effective kicks are worth 4, effective handballs are worth 1.5, marks are worth 2, goals 8, behinds 1, tackles 4, clangers -4, contested possessions 4, score assists 3.5, 1 %'s are worth 1, bounces are worth 1, and intercepts are worth 2.
I understand how damaging the play is matters and when in the game it happens is important but Laird is almost as damaging as Lloyd in any case, both get cheapies and both get important possessions. Because everyone had him CD downscaled him?
Hey mate, can't help but notice you're a newer member, but me and a couple of others here have discussed SC scoring at great lengths in the past, and after years of watching live scores, I created this:
KICKS
Ineffective: 0
Backwards and effective: 1
Long (40+ metres) to a contest: 2
Short and effective: 3
Long to advantage (effective): 5
Clanger (unforced error): -3
NOTE: A kick to a contest less than 40 metres in distance is deemed ineffective.
HANDBALLS
Ineffective: 0
Effective: 1
MARKS
From teammate, uncontested: 1
From teammate, contested: 3
From teammate, contested inside 50: 4
From teammate, on lead: 3
From opposition, uncontested: 3
From opposition, contested: 6
FREE KICKS
Free for: 3 (counts as a contested possession)
Free against, in a contested situation: -1
Free against, in an uncontested situation: -3
Give away a 50 meter penalty: -5
HITOUTS
To advantage: 5
To disadvantage (sharked by opposition): -1
Gather from ruck contest: 2
TACKLES: 3
GOAL: 6* (can vary dramatically depending on closeness of the match)
HANDBALL RECEIVE: 1
HARD OR LOOSE BALL GET: 3
SPOIL, SHEPHERD OR SMOTHER: 1
SPOIL GAINING POSSESSION: 3
SCORE ASSIST: 3
CONTESTED KNOCK ON TO ADVANTAGE: 4
BOUNCE: 1
It's far from perfect, and almost certainly missing some stats that score points, but it's a hell of a lot better to use as a guideline than the 'scoring' provided on the Supercoach website. So as you can see, there's a lot more to it than just the stats you've used above.