Strategy 2023: Round 10 Trades

How many trade boosts do you have left? (Before this week's trades)

  • 0

    Votes: 36 29.0%
  • 1

    Votes: 47 37.9%
  • 2

    Votes: 28 22.6%
  • 3

    Votes: 8 6.5%
  • 4

    Votes: 5 4.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    124
Joined
23 Mar 2019
Messages
2,131
Likes
7,021
Not a lot of talk about Bytel. Seems like he has good JS, has been the sub a fair bit but might get better opportunities with Steele carrying an injury etc. 116k this week.
From perusing the StKilda board it seems like many of their fans consider him an understudy to Steele/Crouch, so it would make sense if he gets Steele's minutes I guess.
Risk is he's just one of those blokes who's too good for VFL but not good enough to make it at the top level.
Thoughts?
Definitely a watch on teams. But Steele isn't likely to be long term, so you're backing him to force himself into the squad?
 
Joined
30 Jan 2013
Messages
1,376
Likes
5,070
I think Sharp is being harshly treated on here.

We are literally talking about him "possibly" getting dropped from a FULL STRENGTH Brisbane team when Rich returns. At worst, he's their 23rd guy and it takes 1 injury/suspension for him to get back into the team.

I remember everyone talking down Dylan Williams a few weeks back because of his "poor job security" when Port literally had no-one on their injury list. What happened? Port picked up a few injuries and now Williams is entrenched inside their 22 (y)
He's not our 23rd guy.

While it's clear the team rates him incredibly highly, Fagan is very religiously a "play your role" guy. Sharp is our #1 backup wing. Wilmot had been playing on a wing but is our #1 backup small defender, so when Rich went down Wilmot pushed back and Sharp came in. I was a bit surprised Prior wasn't the choice over Wilmot but c'est la vie. However that means if Zorko goes down again, Sharp isn't necessarily the next up. Same if it's one of the mids, and obviously the talls are a separate kettle of fish. Sharp happens to be the beneficiary that an injury opens up a spot for someone playing his role - an injury or suspension elsewhere doesn't necessarily get him back into the team.
 
Joined
20 Mar 2016
Messages
1,397
Likes
4,836
Not a lot of talk about Bytel. Seems like he has good JS, has been the sub a fair bit but might get better opportunities with Steele carrying an injury etc. 116k this week.
From perusing the StKilda board it seems like many of their fans consider him an understudy to Steele/Crouch, so it would make sense if he gets Steele's minutes I guess.
Risk is he's just one of those blokes who's too good for VFL but not good enough to make it at the top level.
Thoughts?
I find it hard to trust Bytel.

Like if he is truly a Steele backup, why wasn't he getting full games when Steele missed Round 3 - 5?
 
Joined
23 Mar 2019
Messages
2,131
Likes
7,021
Someone talk me out if a MPM move on Chandler.

Feel like I need to move him on to save his cash, but he needs to be a downgrade as I've used the McKenna money to turn Hopper into Walsh.

Problem is he's on field and if I move to Drury it leaves me with Sharp and Humphrey on field. And a F/M bench coverage that is pretty much non existent (Davey, Angwin, Drury and dead rookies).

If I go to a MPM option then I can take a little bit of money from Chandler, get some points in field, and not lose money this week (and with the right choice make some money)

It would necessarily be a short term play to the bye, so would favour a late bye player, and I would still have other rookies on field to deal with around the byes (Ashcroft, Callaghan, Humphrey, Mitchell/Ginbey), but at this stage I'm playing for overall and it feels like the points might be more important in the short term.

Options are: Kennedy (as discussed previously), Milera (it would be about year 5 in a row that he's made it into my side, and it's never ended well), Hobbs (Parish and Setterfield out = midfield time)....others....
 
Joined
30 Jan 2013
Messages
1,376
Likes
5,070
Looking for opinions given the general pluses/minuses of options this week are fairly even.

19 trades left and LDU out, $45k or so in the bank.

I could move on LDU w/ 1 trade. However that only gets me to $543k where the options are limited.
- Rowell, Rozee (F - but would just about finish my forward line without Walsh if he gets it), others?

Moving on LDU w/ 2 trades lets me target Walsh as an obvious option as a good mid choice even if he doesn't get forward status. However the downgrade options are meh:
- Callaghan > Humphrey? (leaves me with a really bad M8 for on-field scoring, esp. if Cincotta is dropped)
- Wilmot > Humphrey? (better on-field score, only $900 left)
- Young or Davey > Drury or Bytel? (don't like Drury as a prospect, Bytel is better but seems really on the fringe, Davey's scoring sucks but at least he's getting games unlike Young who has disappeared)

Thoughts on one trade vs two, and if two which downgrade option?
 
Joined
26 Jun 2019
Messages
2,559
Likes
9,517
AFL Club
Richmond
Someone talk me out if a MPM move on Chandler.

Feel like I need to move him on to save his cash, but he needs to be a downgrade as I've used the McKenna money to turn Hopper into Walsh.

Problem is he's on field and if I move to Drury it leaves me with Sharp and Humphrey on field. And a F/M bench coverage that is pretty much non existent (Davey, Angwin, Drury and dead rookies).

If I go to a MPM option then I can take a little bit of money from Chandler, get some points in field, and not lose money this week (and with the right choice make some money)

It would necessarily be a short term play to the bye, so would favour a late bye player, and I would still have other rookies on field to deal with around the byes (Ashcroft, Callaghan, Humphrey, Mitchell/Ginbey), but at this stage I'm playing for overall and it feels like the points might be more important in the short term.

Options are: Kennedy (as discussed previously), Milera (it would be about year 5 in a row that he's made it into my side, and it's never ended well), Hobbs (Parish and Setterfield out = midfield time)....others....
I'm tossing up with something similar, basically comes down to delaying an upgrade next week until the MP player is moved on.
 
Joined
20 Mar 2016
Messages
1,397
Likes
4,836
He's not our 23rd guy.

While it's clear the team rates him incredibly highly, Fagan is very religiously a "play your role" guy. Sharp is our #1 backup wing. Wilmot had been playing on a wing but is our #1 backup small defender, so when Rich went down Wilmot pushed back and Sharp came in. I was a bit surprised Prior wasn't the choice over Wilmot but c'est la vie. However that means if Zorko goes down again, Sharp isn't necessarily the next up. Same if it's one of the mids, and obviously the talls are a separate kettle of fish. Sharp happens to be the beneficiary that an injury opens up a spot for someone playing his role - an injury or suspension elsewhere doesn't necessarily get him back into the team.
Yeah ok maybe calling him Lion No. 23 was a bit strong.

I do think the flexibility of guys like Wilmot & Jarrod Berry definitely helps his case though. They have the scope to be shuffled around to cover injuries in different positions and open up a spot on the wing for Sharp (y)
 

Ben's Beasts

Leadership Group
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
19,077
Likes
80,354
AFL Club
Melbourne
How many 190K+ rookies can people realistically bring in at this point though?

Sure, you may be able to get Humphrey and a premium upgrade this week - but does that compromise your team next week or the week after and lock you out of Wardlaw?

I think it is wise that people plan ahead here.
Planning ahead crucial for sure.

Are coaches realistically going to be making upgrades rounds 11 and 12 though with the byes approaching and then actually beginning round 12? Personally I’m not planning on making any further upgrades after this round until round 13 when there will be premium options who have had their bye from Brisbane, Fremantle, St Kilda or Sydney.

I think Humphrey needs to be viewed as a quick money maker and then most likely gone at his round 13 bye. If he can average 67 over the next 3 rounds then that’s a quick 100k made while fielding a decent enough score each week. It comes down to our expectations on him though. If he is viewed by anybody as a 40-50 guy then probably not worth going there.
 
Joined
20 Mar 2016
Messages
1,397
Likes
4,836
Planning ahead crucial for sure.

Are coaches realistically going to be making upgrades rounds 11 and 12 though with the byes approaching and then actually beginning round 12? Personally I’m not planning on making any further upgrades after this round until round 13 when there will be premium options who have had their bye from Brisbane, Fremantle, St Kilda or Sydney.

I think Humphrey needs to be viewed as a quick money maker and then most likely gone at his round 13 bye. If he can average 67 over the next 3 rounds then that’s a quick 100k made while fielding a decent enough score each week. It comes down to our expectations on him though. If he is viewed by anybody as a 40-50 guy then probably not worth going there.
I'm certainly squeezing in an upgrade next week, given it is one of the last opportunities left to expose unfinished teams that are fielding rookies on field.

I rate Humphrey, but I can only fit in one expensive rookie and I don't want to miss Wardlaw if North is giving him a key inside midfield role - there aren't many (if any) rookies like that left
 

Ben's Beasts

Leadership Group
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
19,077
Likes
80,354
AFL Club
Melbourne
I'm certainly squeezing in an upgrade next week, given it is one of the last opportunities left to expose unfinished teams that are fielding rookies on field.

I rate Humphrey, but I can only fit in one expensive rookie and I don't want to miss Wardlaw if North is giving him a key inside midfield role - there aren't many (if any) rookies like that left
Fair enough.

For your specific set of circumstances it is understandable that you are skipping on Humphrey.
 
Joined
8 May 2018
Messages
646
Likes
1,785
Off the top of their head, does anyone know if the expected price changes displayed on the Footywire site are based on a players average score or their 3 round average score? thanks.
 
Joined
24 Mar 2015
Messages
4,154
Likes
14,751
AFL Club
North Melb.
I find it hard to trust Bytel.

Like if he is truly a Steele backup, why wasn't he getting full games when Steele missed Round 3 - 5?
He was in hospital and then injured after getting a cut to his knee at the end of the Round 1 match.

But still hard to trust, as he seems like he's their favourite sub. I don't see how he makes any money when every second game could be a single digits score :confused:
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,730
Likes
107,814
AFL Club
Collingwood
May as well have a crack

Chandler - > Berry
Baker - > Sharp
Hopper - > Walsh

$ 232,800.00 in the Bank

Atkins & Wilmot @ M7 & M8 hopefully can get to $ 300k + each
Berry confirmed as sub (could do a Williams) so Drury it is , DPP might come in useful (maybe)

$ 254,300.00 in the Bank possibly gets Wilmot - > Merrett/Neale in one go (fingers crossed)

No Johnson , need Cincotta to play and make more $ otherwise the final upgrade maybe extremely difficult
 
Joined
14 Jul 2020
Messages
1,192
Likes
2,132
AFL Club
Collingwood
Thoughts on a left wing approach?
Ballard, Haynes?
Both seem to have hit form?
Haynes used to be a premo, is he back in that role?
Ballard seems to have had a lot of talk over the last few weeks, could this be a AA year for him?


Also i seem to recall someone posted something about how Fagan said Sharp will get a decent run?

Also heard Drury is moving to the backline this week? Especially via some north fans ik

Can anyone validate any of this please
 
Top