Opinion 2024 AFL SuperCoach Planning Thread

Santoz

Santoz

#1,261
Joined
2 Mar 2014
Messages
2,858
Likes
5,272
AFL Club
Essendon
#1,261
If a Sweet or Naismith type are selected OR & Rd 1 then surely you have to take them and forego the donut R/F. As many have said, you have to trust Jackson being a Top 8 forward in his own right and treat his DPP as an added flex bonus.

If a ruck gets injured early then surely you just sideways to the best player available or cover with Sweet/Naismith if the injury is short term.
 
Ben's Beasts

Ben's Beasts

Leadership Group
#1,262
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
19,770
Likes
84,590
AFL Club
Melbourne
#1,262
donnybuang said:
Is it as simple as fading guys with the round 2 or 3 bye? At least the round 5/6 bye players can be flipped for a player who's already had their bye.
Click to expand...
They don’t even need to be flipped for a player who has already had their bye. In the case of round 5, you could trade them for any player outside of those on the bye or the round 6 bye. In the case of round 6, you could trade them for any player outside of the round 6 bye.

Each player still has a bye to come even if they have already had a bye at the time of trading.
 
T

TBG

#1,263
Joined
3 Oct 2022
Messages
666
Likes
1,964
AFL Club
Collingwood
#1,263
Who are people thinking is the most likely rookie ruckman to play early to have as a cash cow at R3? I think either Conway (not much confidence though on Cats ruck history) or Sweet (if Soldo stinks it up/gets injured early)?
 
blue dreamer

blue dreamer

#1,264
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
4,277
Likes
6,648
AFL Club
Carlton
#1,264
Can't find the old "mid price madness" thread.

Can someone just remind me the upper and lower player price points for this competition please.
 
Miller is a Steele

Miller is a Steele

#1,267
Joined
25 Dec 2022
Messages
3,572
Likes
17,730
AFL Club
West Coast
#1,267
How many Freo players do we think is too many?

Serong, Ryan, Brayshaw, Darcy, Jackson and Young all available as premiums.

Fyfe and Chapman showing promise as mid-pricers.

Emmett, Taberner, Worner, Sharp, McDonald and Simpson all potentially relevant as rookies.

I currently have 4 (Serong, Brayshaw, Young, Sharp). You would think as a team they would improve on last season’s finish of 14th. Relatively young side who should only get better as a team and keep getting better at their individual game and capabilities. Obviously they have a great bye (Round 13) but do we set a limit on how many we touch, in particular their premium options?
 
Chumpion

Chumpion

#1,268
Joined
9 Dec 2020
Messages
2,635
Likes
13,494
AFL Club
Essendon
#1,268
Miller is a Steele said:
How many Freo players do we think is too many?

Serong, Ryan, Brayshaw, Darcy, Jackson and Young all available as premiums.

Fyfe and Chapman showing promise as mid-pricers.

Emmett, Taberner, Worner, Sharp, McDonald and Simpson all potentially relevant as rookies.

I currently have 4 (Serong, Brayshaw, Young, Sharp). You would think as a team they would improve on last season’s finish of 14th. Relatively young side who should only get better as a team and keep getting better at their individual game and capabilities. Obviously they have a great bye (Round 13) but do we set a limit on how many we touch, in particular their premium options?
Click to expand...
I think what’s relevant is how many of the players you also have from their opponents across the first phase of the season.
If you have a few players from teams they’re matched up against your exposure is more giving the fixed nature of total points.

I personally don’t love too many from one team because you never know what could happen and it’s hard to unwind that position if it doesn’t pan out, but I think if there is a mix across premiums and rookies it’s manageable because they’ve got different roles/expectations.
 
NT.Thunder

NT.Thunder

#1,269
Joined
24 Feb 2015
Messages
6,717
Likes
30,260
AFL Club
Collingwood
#1,269
What changed for Brayshaw later in the season last year?

I remember early he was pretty ordinary, I had him in RDT and was killing me.
 
Connoisseur

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
#1,271
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
39,516
Likes
128,628
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
#1,271
Miller is a Steele said:
How many Freo players do we think is too many?

Serong, Ryan, Brayshaw, Darcy, Jackson and Young all available as premiums.

Fyfe and Chapman showing promise as mid-pricers.

Emmett, Taberner, Worner, Sharp, McDonald and Simpson all potentially relevant as rookies.

I currently have 4 (Serong, Brayshaw, Young, Sharp). You would think as a team they would improve on last season’s finish of 14th. Relatively young side who should only get better as a team and keep getting better at their individual game and capabilities. Obviously they have a great bye (Round 13) but do we set a limit on how many we touch, in particular their premium options?
Click to expand...
Chumpion said:
I think what’s relevant is how many of the players you also have from their opponents across the first phase of the season.
If you have a few players from teams they’re matched up against your exposure is more giving the fixed nature of total points.

I personally don’t love too many from one team because you never know what could happen and it’s hard to unwind that position if it doesn’t pan out, but I think if there is a mix across premiums and rookies it’s manageable because they’ve got different roles/expectations.
Click to expand...
@Chumpion covered most bases and I would treat it like how we would in a single game round for BBL SC (for example). Comes down to your risk appetite in regards to how many premiums from one side but as mentioned above, the best mix would ideally be split between premiums and rookies.

I'd prefer to delay investment and reliance on players from a certain side until later in the season rather than the outset given the portion of the cap tied up with the performance of that side and so we have a greater sample size to hopefully make a more informed decision.
 
Baglimit

Baglimit

#1,273
Joined
23 Feb 2021
Messages
797
Likes
2,513
AFL Club
Adelaide
#1,273
Manikato1

Manikato1

#1,277
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,903
Likes
12,348
AFL Club
West Coast
#1,277
Gruffles said:
These days with the top rookies being ready made and costing 200kish maybe it's worth revising the price points?
225k + or even 250k+? Just a thought.
Click to expand...
The top rookies have been starting 200k plus for years as it is a set formula. No 1 is $207k and that goes back to the Sam Walsh days. I get your point but my vote would be to not increase the top end. It is tough finding a reasonable team but that is half the fun. Just my 2c.
 
Ironhawk

Ironhawk

#1,278
Joined
15 Mar 2019
Messages
15,463
Likes
59,808
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#1,278
Manikato1 said:
The top rookies have been starting 200k plus for years as it is a set formula. No 1 is $207k and that goes back to the Sam Walsh days. I get your point but my vote would be to not increase the top end. It is tough finding a reasonable team but that is half the fun. Just my 2c.
Click to expand...
It would make it tougher if I changed the 200K lower limit to say 210K to avoid the top 2 draft picks. I figure it allows maybe two gimme selections each year, but if there was enough interest to change this I could.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top