Opinion 2024 AFL SuperCoach Planning Thread

X

xanderdom

#2,063
Joined
9 Mar 2023
Messages
1,192
Likes
4,757
AFL Club
Richmond
#2,063
Shannon said:
Yep, very annoying - you do your own research/planning & then others just get spoon fed all the info on social media :mad:
Click to expand...
I think it's inevitable and not worth being irritated over. We get a lot of our information from enthusiasts on Twitter and share it here as well. The amount of invaluable information that gets posted here is what makes this community.

Realistically there are still PODs available despite what some may believe. Guys like Wines or Wardlaw are well known for high upside and high risk, but majority aren't risking those picks which effectively makes them PODs, all depends on your risk appetite.

And it's like @jel said, "There is still a place for a savvy operator to sort the wheat from the chaff and make a better decision than the average punter". Couldn't be more true in my opinion.
 
NT.Thunder

NT.Thunder

#2,064
Joined
24 Feb 2015
Messages
6,697
Likes
30,160
AFL Club
Sydney
#2,064
jel said:
Yes and no. I think it's moved from doing your research to find the hidden gems to doing your research to be able to filter the info that you see as valuable. With so many Supercoach sites and podcasts, it seems every man and his dog has an opinion on a player and often they are completely opposite.
There is still a place for a savvy operator to sort the wheat from the chaff and make a better decision than the average punter.
Click to expand...
xanderdom said:
I think it's inevitable and not worth being irritated over. We get a lot of our information from enthusiasts on Twitter and share it here as well. The amount of invaluable information that gets posted here is what makes this community.

Realistically there are still PODs available despite what some may believe. Guys like Wines or Wardlaw are well known for high upside and high risk, but majority aren't risking those picks which effectively makes them PODs, all depends on your risk appetite.


And it's like @jel said, "There is still a place for a savvy operator to sort the wheat from the chaff and make a better decision than the average punter". Couldn't be more true in my opinion.
Click to expand...
I don't think people are irate over it, most have accepted this is the norm and it's not just fantasy games, it's information overload really in everything. I also don't think there's too much variance in opinion when it comes to SC, the information I read and listen to is pretty consistent. The days of having to watch every game of AFL to do well in SC are over, I honestly think you'd probably rank higher not watching any games and just following specific sources.

The fact that SC has moved to 40 trades now supports this view also IMO
 
Spots

Spots

#2,065
Joined
13 Mar 2016
Messages
1,810
Likes
5,993
AFL Club
West Coast
#2,065
NT.Thunder said:
I don't think people are irate over it, most have accepted this is the norm and it's not just fantasy games, it's information overload really in everything. I also don't think there's too much variance in opinion when it comes to SC, the information I read and listen to is pretty consistent. The days of having to watch every game of AFL to do well in SC are over, I honestly think you'd probably rank higher not watching any games and just following specific sources.

The fact that SC has moved to 40 trades now supports this view also IMO
Click to expand...
100% agree... it's information overload but the most common ones like what's produced by the Hun is generally just lazy reporting (information with the least amount of effort) with rookies recommended just because they were high picks.

Even on this site (and this isn't a criticism of anyone) there are a few who seem to have more informed and relevant data whose opinions I place more emphasis on than others.
 
Juzzo

Juzzo

#2,066
Joined
16 Jun 2013
Messages
5,465
Likes
11,297
AFL Club
Adelaide
#2,066
Spots said:
100% agree... it's information overload but the most common ones like what's produced by the Hun is generally just lazy reporting (information with the least amount of effort) with rookies recommended just because they were high picks.

Even on this site (and this isn't a criticism of anyone) there are a few who seem to have more informed and relevant data whose opinions I place more emphasis on than others.
Click to expand...
So not only do we have to sort the wheat from the chaff of Journos/Reporters, we have to do the same for SCS members. This is too hard. :LOL:
 
Under The Dome

Under The Dome

#2,072
Joined
7 Sep 2020
Messages
12,105
Likes
42,567
#2,072
F

freowho

#2,073
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
6,769
Likes
14,766
AFL Club
Fremantle
#2,073
I tend to not create teams until after the pre season games but I keep lists of potential keepers and potential cash cows on each line and tinker with predicted averages as I do some research or hear some news. Normally I'd have about 60 players on these lists. I currently have a 100!!!
 
Darkie

Darkie

Leadership Group
#2,074
Joined
12 Apr 2014
Messages
25,417
Likes
65,522
AFL Club
Collingwood
#2,074
Under The Dome said:
Awesome 1 point

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757649375260807361
View: https://twitter.com/pad_nauseum/status/1757649375260807361

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757656134138331603
View: https://twitter.com/DidakDT/status/1757656134138331603
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757656557750563302
View: https://twitter.com/DidakDT/status/1757656557750563302
Click to expand...
Fin Macrae has come a very long way if he and De Goey against Daicos, Pendles, Mitchell and Crisp is anywhere near “evenly matched”.
 
Professor

Professor

#2,079
Joined
9 Aug 2012
Messages
40,132
Likes
151,446
AFL Club
Carlton
#2,079
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757619942592287206
View: https://twitter.com/OfficialWOOF/status/1757619942592287206


https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757621113776202233
View: https://twitter.com/OfficialWOOF/status/1757621113776202233

Bugger, tweets are protected, only followers can read. Let's bypass this.

Doggy-Bag Takeaways 1 of 2 An extended session of 'scenario based' match sim before the proper match sim. 25 min quarters with normal IC changes. A lot of Footscray players used. Clarke survived a knee injury type scare. He's okay An almost Best of vs Rest of type team set-up.

Doggy-Bag Takeaways 2 of 2 Players took the match sim very seriously with some tough tackling and tempers flaring but in the right way. Bont dominate. JJ Impressive. L.Jones impassable. JOD improving. Sanders went on some runs and used the ball brilliantly. Treloar was a force
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top