Opinion Questions For Rowsus
- Thread starter Rowsus
- Start date
- Status
Hi Darkie,
while our Def lines are very similar, there are two key differences, that push us on different paths. You have Lever, and Brown is the only "tradeable" player on your Def line right now. I have McIntosh, and already have Adamson. I will keep Brown for the job he was picked for. I expected him to be a slow burn to $250k at about Rnd 13 or 14. He got there 5 Rounds quicker, but that doesn't change his job for me. He will sit at M8. I chose him with the intention of keeping him, and I will stick by that at this stage. In your situation, I would trade him to Adamson. You get good dollars and the loophole completed.
Both Birchall and Smith are interesting propositions. I can see Smith in particular being popular in a few weeks, being so cheap. Birchall is always an injury risk, but I keep coming back to him as an option. Of the two, I think I prefer Smith, when bottomed out. It will be hard to have a good exit plan if he doesn't work out though, as he will be too cheap to fix easily. Still probably worth the risk at around $340k though. Smith's "00" score this week is around 98. That means he needs to score 98 this week, to have a B/E of 98 next week. As a rough idea, after he has played Freo this week, his B/E for the Carlton game in Rnd 10 will be approximately 196 - this weeks score. I'm guessing that means it will still be over 100!
while our Def lines are very similar, there are two key differences, that push us on different paths. You have Lever, and Brown is the only "tradeable" player on your Def line right now. I have McIntosh, and already have Adamson. I will keep Brown for the job he was picked for. I expected him to be a slow burn to $250k at about Rnd 13 or 14. He got there 5 Rounds quicker, but that doesn't change his job for me. He will sit at M8. I chose him with the intention of keeping him, and I will stick by that at this stage. In your situation, I would trade him to Adamson. You get good dollars and the loophole completed.
Both Birchall and Smith are interesting propositions. I can see Smith in particular being popular in a few weeks, being so cheap. Birchall is always an injury risk, but I keep coming back to him as an option. Of the two, I think I prefer Smith, when bottomed out. It will be hard to have a good exit plan if he doesn't work out though, as he will be too cheap to fix easily. Still probably worth the risk at around $340k though. Smith's "00" score this week is around 98. That means he needs to score 98 this week, to have a B/E of 98 next week. As a rough idea, after he has played Freo this week, his B/E for the Carlton game in Rnd 10 will be approximately 196 - this weeks score. I'm guessing that means it will still be over 100!
Hi Rowsus,
Member for a while, first time poster in this area, so here goes nothing
I'm in a position to upgrade my final midfield spot and have narrowed it down to a Sydney player for a few reasons
a) I don't have a single Sydney premo player in my side
b) Top 4 team (should be) = bigger slice of the pie = more wins (theoretically)
c) Few young guns who can run all day long
Current midfield is Fyfe, Mundy, Pendles, Neale, Selwood, Lewis, Rocky.
The 3 Sydney players who i'm looking at are JPK, Parker and Hanners. All 3 are now priced very similar
JPK - $581,200
Hanners - $578,200
Parker - $553,000
Not phased about most mids having the rd12 bye. Ignoring averages as Parker has been injured/different position, which one would you pick? I'm leaning towards Hanners for a POD but also averaging really well to date, just worried he may slow down late in the year. Or is my question like how long is a piece of string? Most people would say JPK and whilst I don't think he's a terrible option, I do think one needs several different players to try and get a bit of an edge on the competition.
Interested to hear your thoughts
Many thanks in advance
Member for a while, first time poster in this area, so here goes nothing
I'm in a position to upgrade my final midfield spot and have narrowed it down to a Sydney player for a few reasons
a) I don't have a single Sydney premo player in my side
b) Top 4 team (should be) = bigger slice of the pie = more wins (theoretically)
c) Few young guns who can run all day long
Current midfield is Fyfe, Mundy, Pendles, Neale, Selwood, Lewis, Rocky.
The 3 Sydney players who i'm looking at are JPK, Parker and Hanners. All 3 are now priced very similar
JPK - $581,200
Hanners - $578,200
Parker - $553,000
Not phased about most mids having the rd12 bye. Ignoring averages as Parker has been injured/different position, which one would you pick? I'm leaning towards Hanners for a POD but also averaging really well to date, just worried he may slow down late in the year. Or is my question like how long is a piece of string? Most people would say JPK and whilst I don't think he's a terrible option, I do think one needs several different players to try and get a bit of an edge on the competition.
Interested to hear your thoughts
Many thanks in advance
I would pick JPK for safety, or Hannes for a bit of PODishness. Refer to my response to Adrenaline at #4640.
I think it is interesting that you are "locking" your Mid line, when your Def line is in a bit of trouble, and your Fwd line also needs work. Each to their own methods though.
- Joined
- 1 Aug 2013
- Messages
- 214
- Likes
- 590
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Hi Rowsus,
I'm looking at bringing in a rd 13 mid premium. Priddis is too expensive but considering each of the three GWS boys (Treloar, Shiel, Ward). In your opinion, who is likely to provide the greatest number of points from now to the end of the season? Alternatively, do you think the wins for GWS will dry up and as a result the SC points will reduce?
Many thanks
I'm looking at bringing in a rd 13 mid premium. Priddis is too expensive but considering each of the three GWS boys (Treloar, Shiel, Ward). In your opinion, who is likely to provide the greatest number of points from now to the end of the season? Alternatively, do you think the wins for GWS will dry up and as a result the SC points will reduce?
Many thanks
- Joined
- 5 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 434
- Likes
- 349
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Mids
Fyfe, Pendlebury, Sidebottom, Kennedy JP, Beams, Priddis, Hannebery, Parker, Wines, Heppell
I'm guessing we'll get a good laugh at some of those in the coming weeks!
Fyfe, Pendlebury, Sidebottom, Kennedy JP, Beams, Priddis, Hannebery, Parker, Wines, Heppell
I'm guessing we'll get a good laugh at some of those in the coming weeks!
I was planning to bring in Priddis this week but is he good value? His big scores have been against easy teams and his draw gets tougher from now.
cheers
G'day Rowsus,
Brought in Yeo last week. Was looking good until his suspension
I guess like the other thousands I am looking at bringing in Rocky this week.
But for who?
I still have Broadbent who I didn't even know was dropped on the weekend.
Can swing Yeo down back and turn him into Rocky. But also have Tarrant, Miller, Cripps, Lonie, Heeney, McIntosh, Krak (probably will get dropped) to deal with.
Would also like Simpson but fall short of Cripps to Simpson and Broadbent to Rocky by $1800.
Thinking Broadbent has to go if he does not play. But after ports loss he may come straight back in.
Then who do I trade for Rocky? Would really only like to use the one trade if possible.
Any thoughts appreciated?
Brought in Yeo last week. Was looking good until his suspension
I guess like the other thousands I am looking at bringing in Rocky this week.
But for who?
I still have Broadbent who I didn't even know was dropped on the weekend.
Can swing Yeo down back and turn him into Rocky. But also have Tarrant, Miller, Cripps, Lonie, Heeney, McIntosh, Krak (probably will get dropped) to deal with.
Would also like Simpson but fall short of Cripps to Simpson and Broadbent to Rocky by $1800.
Thinking Broadbent has to go if he does not play. But after ports loss he may come straight back in.
Then who do I trade for Rocky? Would really only like to use the one trade if possible.
Any thoughts appreciated?
Hey Rowsus
Got a decision to make this week. Two options:
A) Downgrade Lonie and upgrade Cripps to Pendles. Pendles sub 600k for the only time he will be all season imo, getting him this week doesnt mess with my bye structures, although if i dont get him this week i will wait til after his bye. Only issue with this one is i think Cripps could be in for a big one this week with Judd and Gibbs supposedly out along with Sydney supposedly resting players.
B) Downgrade Lonie and upgrade CEY to Wines. If I dont get rid of him this week ill certainly downgrade him next week before his bye. His money making maybe getting close to finished. Wines is someone i think would be a good POD, and score at 108-110 from here on, although if I dont get him this week i dont think ill get him at all.
I dont have Rocky and am adamant on picking him
up after his bye, so he isnt an option this week.
Slightly leaning towards option A, its the fact that i think Cripps is in for a big one Friday thats giving me doubts. Would love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks
MrM
Got a decision to make this week. Two options:
A) Downgrade Lonie and upgrade Cripps to Pendles. Pendles sub 600k for the only time he will be all season imo, getting him this week doesnt mess with my bye structures, although if i dont get him this week i will wait til after his bye. Only issue with this one is i think Cripps could be in for a big one this week with Judd and Gibbs supposedly out along with Sydney supposedly resting players.
B) Downgrade Lonie and upgrade CEY to Wines. If I dont get rid of him this week ill certainly downgrade him next week before his bye. His money making maybe getting close to finished. Wines is someone i think would be a good POD, and score at 108-110 from here on, although if I dont get him this week i dont think ill get him at all.
I dont have Rocky and am adamant on picking him
up after his bye, so he isnt an option this week.
Slightly leaning towards option A, its the fact that i think Cripps is in for a big one Friday thats giving me doubts. Would love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks
MrM
Last edited:
Hey Bobbie,
the Cripps situation is really intrigueing now, isn't it?
Malthouse gone, Judd and Gibbs out this week, does it all inject life into Cripps' SC career?
I traded Cripps out last week after having a closer look at him. He's only averaging 6.3 Kicks a game, but also 14.6 H'balls, 5 Clearances and 5 Tackles. I was really worried about that low kick count, as it is hard to score consistently well with only 6 kicks/game. He also got a really flattering score with his 104 against Brisbane. His score kept rising in the 2nd half, on the back of very few possessions. He faces a B/E of 86 this week against Sydney, and his chances of hitting that have risen considerably with Judd and Gibbs out. The problem is, he also has a "00" number of 100 this week (ie he needs to score 100, to have a B/E of 100 for his next game against Adelaide.) Judd and Gibbs won't be out forever, and it's possible the new Coach will want to pour on ball time and stoppages into Cripps. It's also possible the Coach will do everything he can to win games, which means everything stays near status quo for Cripps. I think he is near the end of his earning potential, and you probably don't lose much by trading him now.
Simpson is priced as a 92-94/game player should be, so you are getting what you pay for there, and that's much better than paying too much for what you're getting! I think a Def is a better match for your team right now, instead of a Fwd.
It's a tough decision, I hope you jump the right way!
the Cripps situation is really intrigueing now, isn't it?
Malthouse gone, Judd and Gibbs out this week, does it all inject life into Cripps' SC career?
I traded Cripps out last week after having a closer look at him. He's only averaging 6.3 Kicks a game, but also 14.6 H'balls, 5 Clearances and 5 Tackles. I was really worried about that low kick count, as it is hard to score consistently well with only 6 kicks/game. He also got a really flattering score with his 104 against Brisbane. His score kept rising in the 2nd half, on the back of very few possessions. He faces a B/E of 86 this week against Sydney, and his chances of hitting that have risen considerably with Judd and Gibbs out. The problem is, he also has a "00" number of 100 this week (ie he needs to score 100, to have a B/E of 100 for his next game against Adelaide.) Judd and Gibbs won't be out forever, and it's possible the new Coach will want to pour on ball time and stoppages into Cripps. It's also possible the Coach will do everything he can to win games, which means everything stays near status quo for Cripps. I think he is near the end of his earning potential, and you probably don't lose much by trading him now.
Simpson is priced as a 92-94/game player should be, so you are getting what you pay for there, and that's much better than paying too much for what you're getting! I think a Def is a better match for your team right now, instead of a Fwd.
It's a tough decision, I hope you jump the right way!
Last edited:
Hi hunterpunter,
I completely concur. Priddis is priced to score 127-129, and that's about 10 higher than the best we can expect from him, IMO. If we were confident he'd go over 120 from here you might consider paying the high price, but we're not, so we shouldn't.
GWS is a bit of lottery in their Midfield this season.
[table="width: 600"]
[tr]
[td]Rnd[/td]
[td]Opp[/td]
[td]Res[/td]
[td]Ward[/td]
[td]Treloar[/td]
[td]Shiel[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]1[/td]
[td]StK[/td]
[td]W 9[/td]
[td]99[/td]
[td]157[/td]
[td]136[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]2[/td]
[td]Melb[/td]
[td]W 45[/td]
[td]106[/td]
[td]107[/td]
[td]149[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3[/td]
[td]Syd[/td]
[td]L 21[/td]
[td]110[/td]
[td]86[/td]
[td]52[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4[/td]
[td]GC[/td]
[td]W 66[/td]
[td]140[/td]
[td]105[/td]
[td]146[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5[/td]
[td]WC[/td]
[td]L 87[/td]
[td]84[/td]
[td]48[/td]
[td]119[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]6[/td]
[td]Haw[/td]
[td]W 10[/td]
[td]131[/td]
[td]101[/td]
[td]104[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]7[/td]
[td]Carl[/td]
[td]W 78[/td]
[td]83[/td]
[td]139[/td]
[td]102[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]8[/td]
[td]Ade[/td]
[td]W 24[/td]
[td]109[/td]
[td]93[/td]
[td]121[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
It seems like in the easier games, 2 of the 3 can score well, but in the tough games, only one can. Throw in Griffen, Coniglio and Greene as SC point competitors, and you probably want to think they can win another 8 or 9 games, to be confident in one of them returning 110 from here. If I was locked in to taking one of the three, I'd take Shiel. He only has the one score under 100 this season, and 4 scores you should be more than happy with.
I completely concur. Priddis is priced to score 127-129, and that's about 10 higher than the best we can expect from him, IMO. If we were confident he'd go over 120 from here you might consider paying the high price, but we're not, so we shouldn't.
GWS is a bit of lottery in their Midfield this season.
[table="width: 600"]
[tr]
[td]Rnd[/td]
[td]Opp[/td]
[td]Res[/td]
[td]Ward[/td]
[td]Treloar[/td]
[td]Shiel[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]1[/td]
[td]StK[/td]
[td]W 9[/td]
[td]99[/td]
[td]157[/td]
[td]136[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]2[/td]
[td]Melb[/td]
[td]W 45[/td]
[td]106[/td]
[td]107[/td]
[td]149[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3[/td]
[td]Syd[/td]
[td]L 21[/td]
[td]110[/td]
[td]86[/td]
[td]52[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4[/td]
[td]GC[/td]
[td]W 66[/td]
[td]140[/td]
[td]105[/td]
[td]146[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5[/td]
[td]WC[/td]
[td]L 87[/td]
[td]84[/td]
[td]48[/td]
[td]119[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]6[/td]
[td]Haw[/td]
[td]W 10[/td]
[td]131[/td]
[td]101[/td]
[td]104[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]7[/td]
[td]Carl[/td]
[td]W 78[/td]
[td]83[/td]
[td]139[/td]
[td]102[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]8[/td]
[td]Ade[/td]
[td]W 24[/td]
[td]109[/td]
[td]93[/td]
[td]121[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
It seems like in the easier games, 2 of the 3 can score well, but in the tough games, only one can. Throw in Griffen, Coniglio and Greene as SC point competitors, and you probably want to think they can win another 8 or 9 games, to be confident in one of them returning 110 from here. If I was locked in to taking one of the three, I'd take Shiel. He only has the one score under 100 this season, and 4 scores you should be more than happy with.
Last edited:
G'day Rowsus,
Brought in Yeo last week. Was looking good until his suspension
I guess like the other thousands I am looking at bringing in Rocky this week.
But for who?
I still have Broadbent who I didn't even know was dropped on the weekend.
Can swing Yeo down back and turn him into Rocky. But also have Tarrant, Miller, Cripps, Lonie, Heeney, McIntosh, Krak (probably will get dropped) to deal with.
Would also like Simpson but fall short of Cripps to Simpson and Broadbent to Rocky by $1800.
Thinking Broadbent has to go if he does not play. But after ports loss he may come straight back in.
Then who do I trade for Rocky? Would really only like to use the one trade if possible.
Any thoughts appreciated?
Brought in Yeo last week. Was looking good until his suspension
I guess like the other thousands I am looking at bringing in Rocky this week.
But for who?
I still have Broadbent who I didn't even know was dropped on the weekend.
Can swing Yeo down back and turn him into Rocky. But also have Tarrant, Miller, Cripps, Lonie, Heeney, McIntosh, Krak (probably will get dropped) to deal with.
Would also like Simpson but fall short of Cripps to Simpson and Broadbent to Rocky by $1800.
Thinking Broadbent has to go if he does not play. But after ports loss he may come straight back in.
Then who do I trade for Rocky? Would really only like to use the one trade if possible.
Any thoughts appreciated?
I think if you are heading towards using one trade for Rocky, it has to be Broady. Even if he returns, I can see Hinkley wanting to really tighten his Defense, and that means more lockdown type roles. Broady only has one good score in 7 games, and I think I would use him to get Rocky. If you are desperate to get both, then it has to be Cripps and Miller. Both or just Rocky, you could mount argument either way, but if you're not sure, always do the one that uses less trades!
Last edited:
- Joined
- 17 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 1,436
- Likes
- 2,961
Hi Rowsus: what's your view on Deledio? A few years ago was a staple in most SC midfields; now has the prized DPP but the Tigers have an awful draw. I'm not really sure what to make of the injury shadow apparently hanging over him but seemingly that hasn't affected him the last few weeks.
Also, on another fallen SC star, what is your plan in the event one G Ablett Jnr returns after the Suns bye? Will you be moving heaven and earth to get him into your team ASAP? Or will it be a wait and see approach for the former SC lock-of-all-locks?
Also, on another fallen SC star, what is your plan in the event one G Ablett Jnr returns after the Suns bye? Will you be moving heaven and earth to get him into your team ASAP? Or will it be a wait and see approach for the former SC lock-of-all-locks?
- Joined
- 26 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 3,147
- Likes
- 3,311
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Hi Rowsus
Me again! Here to get some more of that Rowsus Wise Wisdom!
I must say that the Melbourne boys last week really hurt my enthusiasm level for my team... Hogan and Vandenberg, players I just only recently traded out, came back to really hurt me... and Lumumba, who I have still kept... continues to disappoint. Made me really look at my team and really think I screwed up. Oh well... onwards and upwards! enough sooking... I was wondering if you could give me your opinion on a few trades and matters?
First off... trading Lumumba... should I? or keep him with the optimistic outlook that he may just improve?
If I were to trade him, I'd be looking at Kade Simpson or Sam Docherty. I have considered Hibberd, but his round 12 bye really sucks for my team, as at this point... I only have 17 players for round 12... AND my next trade option make it 16!
I have a goal next week of trading in JSelwood for either Cripps or Miller (Miller depends on if he makes his BE and Selwood fails to make his). So I have to save a bit of my 345k for that trade. If I were to do the Lumumba to Selwood trade, then I might be also able to do a Tarrant to Franklin trade. DO you think Franklin is good value, and do you see him improving? If I make that Franklin trade, I will go down to 16 round 12 players, but bringing in Selwood would make it 17 (If I can trade out Miller), then I will wait to after round 11 to bring in possibly a Brodie Smith or other after bye players.
Should I take a risk and go down below 18 players for the round 12 bye and hope I can trade in players to cover me after rd 11?
Also, What is your opinion on Cyril Rioli? Personally I love the guy! but do you think he can maintain his average or build on it. Looks fit and confident, and the club and player firmly believe the hamstring is now no longer an issue.
Be great to hear your opinion... Thanks in advance.
Me again! Here to get some more of that Rowsus Wise Wisdom!
I must say that the Melbourne boys last week really hurt my enthusiasm level for my team... Hogan and Vandenberg, players I just only recently traded out, came back to really hurt me... and Lumumba, who I have still kept... continues to disappoint. Made me really look at my team and really think I screwed up. Oh well... onwards and upwards! enough sooking... I was wondering if you could give me your opinion on a few trades and matters?
First off... trading Lumumba... should I? or keep him with the optimistic outlook that he may just improve?
If I were to trade him, I'd be looking at Kade Simpson or Sam Docherty. I have considered Hibberd, but his round 12 bye really sucks for my team, as at this point... I only have 17 players for round 12... AND my next trade option make it 16!
I have a goal next week of trading in JSelwood for either Cripps or Miller (Miller depends on if he makes his BE and Selwood fails to make his). So I have to save a bit of my 345k for that trade. If I were to do the Lumumba to Selwood trade, then I might be also able to do a Tarrant to Franklin trade. DO you think Franklin is good value, and do you see him improving? If I make that Franklin trade, I will go down to 16 round 12 players, but bringing in Selwood would make it 17 (If I can trade out Miller), then I will wait to after round 11 to bring in possibly a Brodie Smith or other after bye players.
Should I take a risk and go down below 18 players for the round 12 bye and hope I can trade in players to cover me after rd 11?
Also, What is your opinion on Cyril Rioli? Personally I love the guy! but do you think he can maintain his average or build on it. Looks fit and confident, and the club and player firmly believe the hamstring is now no longer an issue.
Be great to hear your opinion... Thanks in advance.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 68
- Likes
- 50
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Hi Rowsus,
First time poster in this thread, but a long time lurker
I admire your contribution to SCS and the advice and ever-present wisdom you provide, so would love your thoughts on my trades for this week.
Am looking to cash in Cripps and Miller to two Premium Mids, but I’m not sure as to who at this stage. Current Premium Mids are: Fyfe, Pendlebury, JPK, Ward, Selwood with $288k in the bank.
To date, I’ve considered: Hannebery, Beams, Parker, Lewis, Heppell and Rockliff. Alternatively, I could take Deledio or Harvey and swing them forward when need be. Unfortunately, if I take one of Hannebery or Beams, I’ll only be able to afford Rockliff or Harvey from those listed. However, if I lower the eyes a bit, I’ll be able to take any 2 of the remaining listed (or any other Mid priced within that price range).
After paying around $580k for Ward a few weeks ago, I’m a bit hesitant to take Hannebery as he is perhaps not the best value for money right now. On a similar note, I’m hesitant to take Parker as I could have picked him up a few weeks ago for around $70k cheaper than he is now, even though he is still $30k cheaper than his starting price. So having to pay that additional $70k burns a little... In hindsight, I should have taken Parker when I took Ward.
So was hoping to get your thoughts on what the best combination would be for my team moving forward?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
First time poster in this thread, but a long time lurker
I admire your contribution to SCS and the advice and ever-present wisdom you provide, so would love your thoughts on my trades for this week.
Am looking to cash in Cripps and Miller to two Premium Mids, but I’m not sure as to who at this stage. Current Premium Mids are: Fyfe, Pendlebury, JPK, Ward, Selwood with $288k in the bank.
To date, I’ve considered: Hannebery, Beams, Parker, Lewis, Heppell and Rockliff. Alternatively, I could take Deledio or Harvey and swing them forward when need be. Unfortunately, if I take one of Hannebery or Beams, I’ll only be able to afford Rockliff or Harvey from those listed. However, if I lower the eyes a bit, I’ll be able to take any 2 of the remaining listed (or any other Mid priced within that price range).
After paying around $580k for Ward a few weeks ago, I’m a bit hesitant to take Hannebery as he is perhaps not the best value for money right now. On a similar note, I’m hesitant to take Parker as I could have picked him up a few weeks ago for around $70k cheaper than he is now, even though he is still $30k cheaper than his starting price. So having to pay that additional $70k burns a little... In hindsight, I should have taken Parker when I took Ward.
So was hoping to get your thoughts on what the best combination would be for my team moving forward?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 1,292
- Likes
- 268
- Joined
- 17 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 1,436
- Likes
- 2,961
It would certainly throw a spanner in the works if he comes back and immediately starts playing close to what he can, and I suspect the Suns dont want a repeat of what happened with him earlier in the year so if he does return you'd think he'd be ready this time......I think almost every player would have to blow through 3 trades to get him in if you aim to upgrade to him from a cow.
I would love to see him back as well, for footy reasons obviously but also because it would be a shocker to most SCers and could be a season-defining situation.
I would love to see him back as well, for footy reasons obviously but also because it would be a shocker to most SCers and could be a season-defining situation.
- Status