Opinion Questions For Rowsus
- Thread starter Rowsus
- Start date
- Status
How Johnsy,
His scores this season: 89, 90, 76 ,61, 85, 106, DNP, 84, 78, 70 - Ave 82
Only 2 scores 90+, and only 1 score 95+.
Coming into this round, there were 17 Defs averaging 90+, and 8 of those were 95+.
That would pretty much mean that Saad isn't a Keeper............ unless:
1) You can afford a near $400k D7/M9, and not too many teams will be able to do that.
2) You are really struggling to fill your team, and you need to save both money and trades, by sitting him at D6.
His scores this season: 89, 90, 76 ,61, 85, 106, DNP, 84, 78, 70 - Ave 82
Only 2 scores 90+, and only 1 score 95+.
Coming into this round, there were 17 Defs averaging 90+, and 8 of those were 95+.
That would pretty much mean that Saad isn't a Keeper............ unless:
1) You can afford a near $400k D7/M9, and not too many teams will be able to do that.
2) You are really struggling to fill your team, and you need to save both money and trades, by sitting him at D6.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 1,292
- Likes
- 268
Bobbie if he scores 70 and plays until round 16 then he will make 120k. You would expect him to have some big games along the way. The issue that I have is the depth of nth if he plays two bad games then his out. His priced at 193 k my initial thoughts is to let him go and focus on a Boston type player but keen to hear row opinion? Sorry row for answering the question on your behalf
Rowsus, could you please remind us of what you see as a sensible structure to target as we look to complete our teams? For example, which bench players should we be looking to have as DPPs, and playing/not playing (ie, floating donuts)?
It's something I've been giving a little thought to as my team nears completion. I am quite unlucky to have a R-F or D-F loop, but the others look quite achievable.
I expect that the upcoming bye rounds and injuries/omissions might distract us from the longer-term plan for the next few weeks, but it could also be a heavy trading period, so I thought I would try to keep the long game in mind!
It's something I've been giving a little thought to as my team nears completion. I am quite unlucky to have a R-F or D-F loop, but the others look quite achievable.
I expect that the upcoming bye rounds and injuries/omissions might distract us from the longer-term plan for the next few weeks, but it could also be a heavy trading period, so I thought I would try to keep the long game in mind!
Even though Saad is just ahead of Newnes on average, I see more upside in holding Newnes than Saad. Saad will not have much improvement in him from here, as first season players can tend to tire as the season gets longer, while Newnes has been in the system a while, and despite his slow start, he has scored ok after that, when Weller has been in the team to take tagging duties.
- Status