Opinion Rate My Team

Which of the following apply to your current team? (multiple choice)

  • Starting with Libba (no Crouch or JOM)

    Votes: 92 38.7%
  • Starting with Libba + Crouch (no JOM)

    Votes: 69 29.0%
  • Starting with Libba + Crouch + JOM

    Votes: 15 6.3%
  • Full GnR (no mid pricers)

    Votes: 19 8.0%
  • GnR + Libba (1 mid pricer in Libba only)

    Votes: 44 18.5%
  • Set and forget rucks

    Votes: 97 40.8%
  • Ruck cover (R/F in your forwardline)

    Votes: 45 18.9%
  • Spending big (starting 3 or more of Shaw/Fyfe/Goldy/Lids/Joey)

    Votes: 37 15.5%
  • Spending less (starting 1 or less of Shaw/Fyfe/Goldy/Lids/Joey)

    Votes: 70 29.4%
  • I will be starting with all 4 of Fyfe/ Ablett/Pendles/Rockliff

    Votes: 46 19.3%
  • Planning to start a POD no one has spoken about

    Votes: 43 18.1%

  • Total voters
    238

WandP

150 Games Club
Joined
13 Apr 2012
Messages
838
Likes
56
AFL Club
Geelong
Go team Wine and Popcorn!

McGovern pick is one I like, Simpson may become him in my side.

Love the deep midfield, clear upgrade targets in Pendles and Danger which is nice.

Rucks, you've obviously got a Goldy plan so all good.

Keep an eye on Lids, was in for scans after training apparently.
Thanks for the feedback re: Lids. Lucky they're first up next week so I can sideways to Dusty if needed.
 

WandP

150 Games Club
Joined
13 Apr 2012
Messages
838
Likes
56
AFL Club
Geelong
Great team. I can see your reasoning behind every player. One thing that stood out to me, you'll happily go Deledio and Shaw at full price, but avoiding Dangerfield and Goldstein who are arguably more durable and more proven and also at peak price. Is this something that you have been set on for quite a while? Or is it something you have done structurally just recently?
Cheers for the feedback Hawk. Shaw has been locked for a while for me as he is the clear #1 defender by a long way, but Lids has been in and out. Goldy has always been out, but the plan has been to bring him in for Smith. I've just never been able to make a starting team with him without making sacrifices I'm not willing to make on other lines. Dangerfield is a recent out for Selwood. I could be totally off, but we're yet to see them play together and gut feel is that Selwood is the more likely of the 2 to benefit scoring-wise from them playing alongside each other.
 
Joined
27 Mar 2015
Messages
442
Likes
761
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Ok. This is where I currently am:

Houli, Laird, Bartel, Weitering, Hartley, Adams, Brown, Broad
Fyfe, Dangerfield, Ablett, Rockliff, Wines, Mills, Menadue, Gresham, Hewett, Davis
Goldstein, Naitanui, Grimley
Martin, Barlow, Hall, Wells, Kennedy, Kerridge, McCarthy, McDonald-Tipu

12.7k left to spend.

Rookies subject to naming, which is where I could come unstuck.
My main concern is not having Dea and then where to downgrade to generate the cash if I feel I need him, or someone like him, Oliver or both become a must.
Toyed with Wines to B Crouch to free up some cash, but that made my midfield look a little light. Also toyed with downgrading either Houli or Bartel to a mid pricer (Johanissen, Sheradon, Lonergan) but don't trust any of them to become a top 10 defender.
Would greatly appreciate any feedback.
 
Joined
15 May 2012
Messages
1,105
Likes
529
AFL Club
North Melb.
The more I fiddle the more I dislike it, thoughts gents?

Shaw, Boyd, Simpson, bartel, Hartley, broad, Adams, tippa
Pendles, ablett, selwood, rocky, libba, mills, Oliver, Davis, Gresham, hewett, keays
Goldie, gawn, Wyatt
Martin, Barlow, boomer, wells, menadue, kerridge, Kennedy, brown
 
Joined
13 Mar 2012
Messages
2,790
Likes
2,985
AFL Club
Adelaide
The more I fiddle the more I dislike it, thoughts gents?

Shaw, Boyd, Simpson, bartel, Hartley, broad, Adams, tippa
Pendles, ablett, selwood, rocky, libba, mills, Oliver, Davis, Gresham, hewett, keays
Goldie, gawn, Wyatt
Martin, Barlow, boomer, wells, menadue, kerridge, Kennedy, brown
I reckon your mids are light on. Have you considered Simpson to Weitering and then say Oliver up? Wines?

Wines has bigger upside v Simpson for mine.
 
Joined
15 May 2012
Messages
1,105
Likes
529
AFL Club
North Melb.
I reckon your mids are light on. Have you considered Simpson to Weitering and then say Oliver up? Wines?

Wines has bigger upside v Simpson for mine.
Haven't really considered the extra mid mate. Hate the way my team looks with only 3 in the fwds, very much doubt I will do it in the backs as well. All dependent on rookies but I am trying to go safeish with my starting team but with players I am extremely keen on
 

THCLT

BBL|05 Winner
Joined
13 Sep 2014
Messages
18,596
Likes
118,259
AFL Club
North Melb.
Haven't really considered the extra mid mate. Hate the way my team looks with only 3 in the fwds, very much doubt I will do it in the backs as well. All dependent on rookies but I am trying to go safeish with my starting team but with players I am extremely keen on
I know how you feel mate, it's just not what we're used to seeing in our starting teams for this year. Due to the availability of rookies, you'll be brave to attempt a 4-4-2-4 structure to start with. Something has to give, and I think going lighter in the FWD is the right move. You're hating it with 3 in the FWD, I've seen teams with 2 and sometimes 1!

Personally, I'm trying to get to 3 in my FWD but feel that I may have to do with 2 as I need to plug up other areas in my team. I'm more focussing on getting ALL my bench rookies playing round 1 with decent JS in order to generate cash as this is my biggest concern going into this season.

Don't get too caught up in having to have X number of rookies in each line as the focus should be on getting ALL the right rookies from the start. To be honest, if there were 8 of such rookies in the FWD and the MID rookies were scarce, I wouldn't hesitate to start with a 0-8 FWD line! You just have to build your team around where all the good rookies present, and this year they seemed to be in the FWD line more so than the MID.
 
Last edited:
Joined
13 Mar 2012
Messages
2,790
Likes
2,985
AFL Club
Adelaide
Haven't really considered the extra mid mate. Hate the way my team looks with only 3 in the fwds, very much doubt I will do it in the backs as well. All dependent on rookies but I am trying to go safeish with my starting team but with players I am extremely keen on
Your forwards are pretty deep really. I wouldn't let wells' price make you think he's a rookie and then Kerridge could be a keeper even at your F5 and you haven't got McCarthy who looks a solid F7 with Kennedy starting.

It's up to you but you seem to running slots with X number of premiums per line and that's leading you I think towards too many mid rookies and not enough where they are presenting being forward currently but I feel we will have more backs turn up R1.

Just saying I think you could safely whack another premium mid in and remove one of those suspect mid rookies for a surer bet in another position.
 
Joined
3 Feb 2014
Messages
3,702
Likes
5,297
AFL Club
West Coast


As the season closes in, my team is nearly ready; with the exception of trying to fit the right rookies in. Team selections may change my starting lineup, but the general essence of the team should remain.

I've managed to create DPP links DEF/MID, MID/FWD, DEF/FWD and FWD/RUC. I'm sadly missing DEF/RUC and MID/RUC, but you can't have everything.

Line by Line:

Defence:

My backline is led by Jimmy Bartel. I believe he has the potential to be the number one averaging defender of 2016, and although he is likely to be rested during the season, I can't say no to a player of his quality at that price.

Jimmy is supported by three potential breakout candidates; some may call into question the risk I'm taking in defence, but rightly or wrongly, I have just as much confidence in these three to average 90+ over the course of a season as I would have with other candidates between $400-500k. I'm not interested in defenders over $500k; durability and price concerns mean they are too risky for me.


Midfield:

With a midfield of Fyfe, Dangerfield, Pendlebury, Ablett, Rockliff and Liberatore, the potential is obvious. If they stay on the park, they have a good chance of all averaging 115+, and finishing as top 10 Midfielders. Things will probably go wrong, but these players are the Elite of the Supercoach world, and they provide excellent captaincy choices.

Rucks:

I believe that Todd Goldstein is going to be the best Ruckman and Stefan Martin won't be far behind in 2016. I reckon Martin has the potential to go 115+ and Goldstein is unlikely to drop below 120, so although starting with the two most expensive rucks is a risky proposition, I believe the potential rewards are great.

Forwards:

Michael Barlow deputizes as the Number One forward for round one. He is supported by the hard-tackling Aaron Hall, the Sydney swing-man Callum Sinclair, and Daniel Wells. The forward line is the second riskiest of the lot.

The elephant in the room: Dayne Zorko.

Some of you may be wondering why I've got Dayne Zorko in the midfield...

Last year, I began with Kamdyn McIntosh in the Defence bench with the Emergency. I wanted his 120 - so I picked Grant Birchall as a premium selection to allow me to take it. It was a risk, and in the short term, it paid off, Birchall returned in round 2, and I got the 120 from McIntosh.

I really like Zorko this year, both his scoring potential with Beams out indefinitely and as a POD, and since I have decided against starting Martin or Deledio as FWD premiums; I figured that I'd pick a player like Menadue to sit as an emergency in round one. If he scores well, then I can keep Zorko, and switch him back to the forward line in Round 2. If he doesn't score well, I have the pick of nearly any forward premium that I want.
 

Ben's Beasts

Leadership Group
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
19,074
Likes
80,340
AFL Club
Melbourne


As the season closes in, my team is nearly ready; with the exception of trying to fit the right rookies in. Team selections may change my starting lineup, but the general essence of the team should remain.

I've managed to create DPP links DEF/MID, MID/FWD, DEF/FWD and FWD/RUC. I'm sadly missing DEF/RUC and MID/RUC, but you can't have everything.

Line by Line:

Defence:

My backline is led by Jimmy Bartel. I believe he has the potential to be the number one averaging defender of 2016, and although he is likely to be rested during the season, I can't say no to a player of his quality at that price.

Jimmy is supported by three potential breakout candidates; some may call into question the risk I'm taking in defence, but rightly or wrongly, I have just as much confidence in these three to average 90+ over the course of a season as I would have with other candidates between $400-500k. I'm not interested in defenders over $500k; durability and price concerns mean they are too risky for me.


Midfield:

With a midfield of Fyfe, Dangerfield, Pendlebury, Ablett, Rockliff and Liberatore, the potential is obvious. If they stay on the park, they have a good chance of all averaging 115+, and finishing as top 10 Midfielders. Things will probably go wrong, but these players are the Elite of the Supercoach world, and they provide excellent captaincy choices.

Rucks:

I believe that Todd Goldstein is going to be the best Ruckman and Stefan Martin won't be far behind in 2016. I reckon Martin has the potential to go 115+ and Goldstein is unlikely to drop below 120, so although starting with the two most expensive rucks is a risky proposition, I believe the potential rewards are great.

Forwards:

Michael Barlow deputizes as the Number One forward for round one. He is supported by the hard-tackling Aaron Hall, the Sydney swing-man Callum Sinclair, and Daniel Wells. The forward line is the second riskiest of the lot.

The elephant in the room: Dayne Zorko.

Some of you may be wondering why I've got Dayne Zorko in the midfield...

Last year, I began with Kamdyn McIntosh in the Defence bench with the Emergency. I wanted his 120 - so I picked Grant Birchall as a premium selection to allow me to take it. It was a risk, and in the short term, it paid off, Birchall returned in round 2, and I got the 120 from McIntosh.

I really like Zorko this year, both his scoring potential with Beams out indefinitely and as a POD, and since I have decided against starting Martin or Deledio as FWD premiums; I figured that I'd pick a player like Menadue to sit as an emergency in round one. If he scores well, then I can keep Zorko, and switch him back to the forward line in Round 2. If he doesn't score well, I have the pick of nearly any forward premium that I want.
I like so much of this team but there are a couple of things I don't like as well.

DEF: I like the Bartel, Sheridan and Lonergan picks but not the Williams pick. He was not picked for NAB3 and I believe he is fringe best 22 at the moment. Not what you want from a 375k pick. I would upgrade him if I were you. Also, going with three 'keeper' picks in defence who have never averaged enough to be keepers before is just too risky. I would say to go with two at the most.

MID: Love it. The five big guns with Libba.

RUC: Very nice. The best ruckman in the game and another ruck who should finish in the top 4 rucks this season imo.

FWD: Barlow, Hall and Wells are all great picks. I'm not a fan of the Sinclair pick though. You have Grimley there for coverage so I don't think Sinclair is needed. You would need to be picking him expecting that he is going to average enough to be a forward keeper. I don't think he will average enough but if you think he will then go with your gut. Zorko who will end up forward for you is an interesting pick. Personally I'm a bit worried on what his role will be especially when the Lions have all their first choice mids available. We have seen he can go large and average enough to be a keeper so he could end up being a good pick but at 543k he's not for me.

Overall really like it and just a couple of minor tweaks that I'm recommending.
 
Joined
3 Feb 2014
Messages
3,702
Likes
5,297
AFL Club
West Coast
I like so much of this team but there are a couple of things I don't like as well.

DEF: I like the Bartel, Sheridan and Lonergan picks but not the Williams pick. He was not picked for NAB3 and I believe he is fringe best 22 at the moment. Not what you want from a 375k pick. I would upgrade him if I were you. Also, going with three 'keeper' picks in defence who have never averaged enough to be keepers before is just too risky. I would say to go with two at the most.

MID: Love it. The five big guns with Libba.

RUC: Very nice. The best ruckman in the game and another ruck who should finish in the top 4 rucks this season imo.

FWD: Barlow, Hall and Wells are all great picks. I'm not a fan of the Sinclair pick though. You have Grimley there for coverage so I don't think Sinclair is needed. You would need to be picking him expecting that he is going to average enough to be a forward keeper. I don't think he will average enough but if you think he will then go with your gut. Zorko who will end up forward for you is an interesting pick. Personally I'm a bit worried on what his role will be especially when the Lions have all their first choice mids available. We have seen he can go large and average enough to be a keeper so he could end up being a good pick but at 543k he's not for me.

Overall really like it and just a couple of minor tweaks that I'm recommending.
Thanks BB. A lot of the questions I have been contemplating have been about the points you've stated. The main issue is finding viable rookies. Depending on the situation, I may be able to do some re-arranging when I know the teams. Williams, Sinclair and Zorko have question marks over their heads - JS, scoring potential and suspension, and as such, they're the most likely to change between now and round 1. I'd really like to go in with a R/F backup, and Grimley is an erratic prospect. If I could be confident in his durability, Leuenberger would be a shoo-in. As it stands, he is still under slight consideration.
 
Joined
4 Jan 2016
Messages
822
Likes
878
AFL Club
Essendon
Been fairly settled on my team for a couple of weeks now.
Any thoughts as to how to improve it? have 93k left
View attachment 1036

Or this way with a little of the risk removed???

View attachment 1037
Hey mate,
Option 1 is pretty much exactly my team although I've got Laird instead of Rich and Gawn instead of Smith.
MY only worry is the lack of Rooks down back. Also contemplating reducing Shaw for a Houli or 400k+ and get another forward in or upgrade some backline rooks.
Thoughts all?
 
Joined
4 Jan 2016
Messages
822
Likes
878
AFL Club
Essendon
Structure-Tick
Proven premiums-Tick
Identification of undervalued premiums-Tick
Convincing rookie selection-Tick
Calculated risk taken-Mmmm, maybe not.
Cannot fault the team, almost every selection offers a sense of security and promise. However, despite being a VERY, VERY solid team, I'd like you to take on 1, maybe 2 potential breakout players as PODs. Hall in the forward line would seem like a good start. Personally I'd downgrade Shaw to a mid 400k defender, downgrade Pendlebury to a Wines type, in order to upgrade Kennedy to Hall. Good luck!!
Hey mate, I'm pretty much running the same structure as Macca, but don't have Dusty (Barlow & Hall ONLY), but have Oliver in the Mids and Dea down back. I've considered the removal of one of the BIG 5 or Shaw... Thoughts??
 
Joined
20 May 2014
Messages
3,346
Likes
8,275
AFL Club
St Kilda
Bump, would love to hear what people think
That's similar to my side although personally I'm not sold on Weitering or Oliver at their prices. Also don't see the point of going Hannebery over Pendlebury given they cost basically the same.
 
Last edited:
Joined
27 Mar 2015
Messages
4,906
Likes
5,442
AFL Club
Carlton
That's similar to my side although personally I'm not sold on Weitering or Oliver at their prices. Also don't see the point of going Hannebery over Pendlebury given they cost basically the same.
I like Hanners over Pendles because he's a lot more of a POD and feel he could be a top 3 mid this year. I will also put my hand up as I was one of the people who chickened out on Pendles with his NAB role
 
Joined
10 Feb 2014
Messages
11,375
Likes
21,228
AFL Club
Essendon
Very solid. You have all the obvious rookie picks. Don't know your bank balance but maybe consider Gresham for Petracca if picked Round 1. Have a plan for Ruggles if he's not named too.
Yeah, they are just holding at the moment. Planning to run a F/D FD and after reading your analysis in the rookie thread, it will probably be Ueberang (sp.)
 
Joined
28 Jun 2012
Messages
5,408
Likes
3,683
AFL Club
Bulldogs
Made Some changes this morning lol. Will explain what it was too with brackets.

B: Shaw, Laird, Houli, Weitering (Dea) Brown, Adams, BEN: Hartley, Ruggles

M: Fyfe, Ablett, Dangerfield, Rockliff, Libba (Hall) Mills, Menaude, Gresham, BEN: Oliver (Gore) Keays, Davis

R: Goldstein, Martin, BEN: Grimley

F: Montagna, Martin, Barlow, Wells, Kerridge, B.Kennedy, BEN: Kommer, McDonald-Tippafjfghgfg

So Trading Hall back to Libba allowed me to upgrade Dea to Weitering and Gore to Oliver. Running with 3 rookies in DEF I'm not sure if I should maybe play it safe with Weitering at D4. Obviously teams will change everyone's plans esp if I see the like of broad, bonner and byrne named. Just read Oscar McDonald (155k) is a strong chance to play after a strong VFL showing.

Really not settled on which way to go hence posting here lol. Downgrading S.Martin and some other tinkering can probably turn that M5 spot into pendles
 
Top