One thing I've learnt in fantasy footy over all these years is that rucks are not the place to traditionally take risks - the options are often limited should something go wrong. We've all had those seasons Herbie with rucks and why it's set and forget for me each year
Even Goldy who some felt was a decent substitute is lagging well behind Gawndy, averaging 101. It is just too much of a gap and not worth the $ saving at the start IMO. Maybe someone has clawed back those 25 ppg with the saved $150K in some fashion they can justify but it wouldn't be many.
After Goldy the 4th averaging ruck is Kruze at around 96.
Mumford averaging 88 and has risen only $90K is also food for thought given many would have started him had he been available R1.
It's a massive discrepancy between Gawndy and the rest and it is hard to see this changing next year at this stage. I think the real killer has been that Gawndy have gone huge regularly enough that there just has not been a great price drop at any time so people have had to find $150-200K+ to do upgrades in the ruck even from Goldy types. It just sets you back too far against the Gawndy teams who are doing real upgrades of rookies in the meantime.