Haven't seen many saying that full premo wouldn't be achieved / would be harder to achieve
Most seemed to be saying that reaching full premo would come later relative to the end of the year using the traditional approach (which might be o***et by price movements after two games to an extent).
Some took that as a cue to thinking about increasing the proportion of underpriced value picks to get off to a better start and hope to be able to maintain a lead over GnR-based sides.
Extreme view would be that GnR teams could take themselves out of the equation in leagues by starting slowly.
That was more how I read the conversation. Not saying I'm right.
This was from one of the herald sun articles.
"Five fewer rounds will make it tougher to get your team to “full-premium” status using the popular guns-and-rookies approach. The fastest way to trade to a top scorer will be by nailing your starting mid-price selections. Say Lachie Whitfield ($604,100, FWD-MID) starts the campaign slowly and Christian Petracca ($441,300, FWD) dominates from the outset in his new midfield role. In one trade, you’ll be able to turn a player who started in the dangerous mid-price bracket such as Petracca into a season keeper. "
"3. RETHINK YOUR ROOKIE STRATEGY
How many rookies do you want to field when cash generation is going to be tough? KFC SuperCoaches found it tough to pinpoint the standout rookies throughout pre-season and that’s arguably only going to be more difficult now."
The journalist seems to be implying that cash will be generated differently. Maybe I'm reading it wrong.