Haven't checked the ownership on Heeney but reckon he is nearly POD territory right?
Meanwhile all the nearly there mid pricers keep failing... Lynch, Brayshaw, Parish. Petracca next?
Naismith almost doing enough to be able to be looped off the bench. Currently have him as R3, may be a viable R2 option for at least this round, can save a few 100K with my current R2 by trading to Conroy and upgrade elsewhere.
Heeney 89 doesn't seem quite right from just 8 touches... There seems to be a handful of player each game who are way above what they should be... and it seems to be the guys who kick early goals.
Heeney 89 doesn't seem quite right from just 8 touches... There seems to be a handful of player each game who are way above what they should be... and it seems to be the guys who kick early goals.
Heeney 89 doesn't seem quite right from just 8 touches... There seems to be a handful of player each game who are way above what they should be... and it seems to be the guys who kick early goals.
No evidence as yet but I have sneaky suspicion that players from winning sides will score more this season. Only reason I have for scores like Heeney and Shiel...!
Haven't checked the ownership on Heeney but reckon he is nearly POD territory right?
Meanwhile all the nearly there mid pricers keep failing... Lynch, Brayshaw, Parish. Petracca next?
Heeney 89 doesn't seem quite right from just 8 touches... There seems to be a handful of player each game who are way above what they should be... and it seems to be the guys who kick early goals.
Naismith almost doing enough to be able to be looped off the bench. Currently have him as R3, may be a viable R2 option for at least this round, can save a few 100K with my current R2 by trading to Conroy and upgrade elsewhere.
What I have gathered from the two games today is that it looks like the players who are involved early seem to get some fairly inflated scores. Smith for Essendon today and arguably Heeney too (only 3 touches and a goal in Q2). Interesting to see how the rest of the games unfold this round.
No evidence as yet but I have sneaky suspicion that players from winning sides will score more this season. Only reason I have for scores like Heeney and Shiel...!
It seems the 'get on a roll' aspect of SC scoring is amplified by shortened games and extra scaling points available.
Even if a team doesn't dominate the scoreboard, the algorithm seems to weight their in-game dominance higher than usual perhaps...
What I have gathered from the two games today is that it looks like the players who are involved early seem to get some fairly inflated scores. Smith for Essendon today and arguably Heeney too (only 3 touches and a goal in Q2). Interesting to see how the rest of the games unfold this round.
I think you're right - I've been trying to get my head around whats happening re scores.
Rebound players, impact players, pressure acts also favoured I think along with winning side.
A winning goal at the end of a game will be huge under the new scoring methinks.
Oh don't get me wrong... He's been really good, but I just reckon he's higher than he should be.
He's not having a 180 point type game.
Also saw it with Riewoldt and Townsend who both kicked multiple early goals in their games and had a massive score that in any other year wouldn't be that high.