Strategy Round 3: Trades
- Thread starter Bomber18
- Start date
I like footywire and tooserious but neither seems to be on top of all the changes. Footywire seems to have it's breakevens sorted but not it's projected price changes. Tooserious doesn't have a price change for a second game but at least their 3rd projected price change shows you which player is the better cash cow.
The breakevens for cheap 1 game players is distorted because it's using their price to create their first game score. I'd be using their projected 3rd price movement instead.
The breakevens for cheap 1 game players is distorted because it's using their price to create their first game score. I'd be using their projected 3rd price movement instead.
You can go with:
BE = 3*CP/MN - (last two scores)
CP = Current Price (k)
MN = Magic Number (4.9 - 5.4k/pt, would go with 5.3-odd for now, decreases throughout the year)
Should be close enough (tested it quickly on Houston - 464.5*3/5.3 - (60+79) = 123.9, he's showing with 123, so a touch off).
Have an old Google sheet I can link to if anyone wants it that does the calculation.
BE = 3*CP/MN - (last two scores)
CP = Current Price (k)
MN = Magic Number (4.9 - 5.4k/pt, would go with 5.3-odd for now, decreases throughout the year)
Should be close enough (tested it quickly on Houston - 464.5*3/5.3 - (60+79) = 123.9, he's showing with 123, so a touch off).
Have an old Google sheet I can link to if anyone wants it that does the calculation.
- Joined
- 15 Oct 2018
- Messages
- 3,912
- Likes
- 12,177
- AFL Club
- Essendon
With the way rucks are scoring I feel like Pittonet is a must have for me and I’ll need to make a sacrifice to get him.
It’s either Doedee to Rivers if Sturt is not named or otherwise Bewley to Sturt. I just brought both of these players in and would be inclined to keep them if Pittonet hadn’t just scored 134.
I do lose a better on field player with this trade but I feel like it’s well worth the money he’ll likely make. I’ll have about 80k in my bank which should be enough to upgrade Viney to Macrae/Titch/Dunkley especially if I downgrade Tom Green
Cavarra will be traded up to Pittonet via Comben.
It’s either Doedee to Rivers if Sturt is not named or otherwise Bewley to Sturt. I just brought both of these players in and would be inclined to keep them if Pittonet hadn’t just scored 134.
I do lose a better on field player with this trade but I feel like it’s well worth the money he’ll likely make. I’ll have about 80k in my bank which should be enough to upgrade Viney to Macrae/Titch/Dunkley especially if I downgrade Tom Green
Cavarra will be traded up to Pittonet via Comben.
Last edited:
Precisely.
The way I see it, it's far more likely that Sturt's 100 is a flash in the pan compared with Pittonet scoring 130 v Max Gawn. Whilst I definitely think Sturt is a priority if he's picked, I could easily see him dropping 50 50 whereas Pittonet with the #1 ruck slot could easily go 90+ for the rest of the season.
I don't think you should force the issue, but you shouldn't avoid him just because he's on the bench. I have BZT on the bench; and Pitto is only $46k more.
The way I see it, it's far more likely that Sturt's 100 is a flash in the pan compared with Pittonet scoring 130 v Max Gawn. Whilst I definitely think Sturt is a priority if he's picked, I could easily see him dropping 50 50 whereas Pittonet with the #1 ruck slot could easily go 90+ for the rest of the season.
I don't think you should force the issue, but you shouldn't avoid him just because he's on the bench. I have BZT on the bench; and Pitto is only $46k more.
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 1,073
- Likes
- 2,924
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Decision this week is whether to trade Jacobs to Gawn (via a downgrade of Wingard to Sturt/Cameron/Bennell) or trade Jacobs to Pittonet as an R2.
Agree with above comments regarding the risk in leaving it too long to grab Gawn in a shortened season...those lost points are hard to make up.
But Pittonet could be the cash cow of the year, so I am seriously torn.
Agree with above comments regarding the risk in leaving it too long to grab Gawn in a shortened season...those lost points are hard to make up.
But Pittonet could be the cash cow of the year, so I am seriously torn.
If I had that team I would go Houston down and Jacobs up to Goldstein as he has a massive 3 weeks ahead and likely stepping stone into G or G could hit that 700k mark which is only a stone throw into Grundy who could get a lower score being tag teamed by Marshall and Ryder.
Also Mumford could come in with Jacobs bad performance.
Maybe even grab Gawn if Williamson comes in.
Also Mumford could come in with Jacobs bad performance.
Maybe even grab Gawn if Williamson comes in.
Last edited:
