Forwards Discussion

Joined
16 Mar 2012
Messages
3,547
Likes
611
AFL Club
Carlton
Can't really say. Depends on how Buckley plays him.
1) What does he need to average to be worth picking? I'd say 90 as a possible stepping stone.
2) How many times has he scored that? 9/71.
3) So what do you think is the likelihood that he achieves that average? I'd say about 1%.
4) Name another C grade key fwd that has been a quality mid priced selection?

Hope he has a big pre-season so people jump on him. Those people will be regretting it very quickly.
 

av1jme

Dual Best & Fairest
Joined
26 Apr 2013
Messages
3,299
Likes
56
AFL Club
Sydney
I'm considering him given that he is a late bloomer and is starting to use his attributes to his advantage.
His last 6 games averaged 83.6 and he is only 25-26 years old.
Will be interesting to see his preseason form and how Buckley plays him.

1) What does he need to average to be worth picking? I'd say 90 as a possible stepping stone.
2) How many times has he scored that? 9/71.
3) So what do you think is the likelihood that he achieves that average? I'd say about 1%.
4) Name another C grade key fwd that has been a quality mid priced selection?

Hope he has a big pre-season so people jump on him. Those people will be regretting it very quickly.
 
Joined
19 Jun 2012
Messages
8,593
Likes
11,671
AFL Club
Collingwood
I'm considering him given that he is a late bloomer and is starting to use his attributes to his advantage.
His last 6 games averaged 83.6 and he is only 25-26 years old.
Will be interesting to see his preseason form and how Buckley plays him.
Key Position Forward. Is first warning. Would only be a stepping stone. If going that way, Gunston any day of the week. Not just in the finals either, has class written all over him.
 
Last edited:

av1jme

Dual Best & Fairest
Joined
26 Apr 2013
Messages
3,299
Likes
56
AFL Club
Sydney
Yes White as a stepping stone. Can't wait for March 2014

Key Position Forward. Is first warning. Would only be a stepping stone. If going that way, Gunston any day of the week. Not just in the finals either, has class written all over him.
 
Joined
12 Oct 2013
Messages
2,924
Likes
267
AFL Club
Bulldogs
We are back to the Gunston conundrum. With Buddy gone it would seem that he slips to Number 2 defender BUT with the recruit of Big Boy McEvoy things might be different. McEvoy is the type of ruckman who can shoulder most of the workload. Don't quote me but something like 85% upwards. That means that David Hale could sit in the Buddy hole. Jarryd Roughead could pick up Number 1 defender depending how high he plays and Hale Number 2 defender. Personally I don't see any team putting their 2nd best defender on Gunston at 193cm when david hale is mobile ruckman at 201cm. Gunston could play across half forward like we saw in the finals and wear down his opponents with his huge aerobic capacity. He is turning 23 next year and his body is getting more football adjusted as he gets older. if everything i have said is true than this next year could be a breakout season for him. but certainly will keep two eyes on him throughout preseason and practice matches.
 
Joined
16 Mar 2012
Messages
3,547
Likes
611
AFL Club
Carlton
We are back to the Gunston conundrum. With Buddy gone it would seem that he slips to Number 2 defender BUT with the recruit of Big Boy McEvoy things might be different. McEvoy is the type of ruckman who can shoulder most of the workload. Don't quote me but something like 85% upwards. That means that David Hale could sit in the Buddy hole. Jarryd Roughead could pick up Number 1 defender depending how high he plays and Hale Number 2 defender. Personally I don't see any team putting their 2nd best defender on Gunston at 193cm when david hale is mobile ruckman at 201cm. Gunston could play across half forward like we saw in the finals and wear down his opponents with his huge aerobic capacity. He is turning 23 next year and his body is getting more football adjusted as he gets older. if everything i have said is true than this next year could be a breakout season for him. but certainly will keep two eyes on him throughout preseason and practice matches.
Season gametime: Franklin 92.4%, Roughead 90.9%, Hale 85.4%, Gunston 82.8%, Bailey 64.9%.
Grand Final: Roughead 93%, Franklin 93%, Gunston 92%, Hale 84%, Bailey 60%.

Next season I'd expect:
McEvoy & Hale: 100% ruck + 70% key forward with Hale virtually always the fwd when both on the field.
Roughead: 90% key forward
Gunston: 40% key forward, 50% 3rd tall / half-fwd

Gunston averaged about 1pt a minute this season and should get a minimum extra 5%, which is nice for those that pick him.
 
Joined
12 Oct 2013
Messages
2,924
Likes
267
AFL Club
Bulldogs
Season gametime: Franklin 92.4%, Roughead 90.9%, Hale 85.4%, Gunston 82.8%, Bailey 64.9%.
Grand Final: Roughead 93%, Franklin 93%, Gunston 92%, Hale 84%, Bailey 60%.

Next season I'd expect:
McEvoy & Hale: 100% ruck + 70% key forward with Hale virtually always the fwd when both on the field.
Roughead: 90% key forward
Gunston: 40% key forward, 50% 3rd tall / half-fwd

Gunston averaged about 1pt a minute this season and should get a minimum extra 5%, which is nice for those that pick him.
For around $370k - $390k do you think he is a lock for the "Strong Possibility" list if he is expected to increase his average?
 
Joined
12 Oct 2013
Messages
2,924
Likes
267
AFL Club
Bulldogs
Certain to improve, just a question of how much. I reckon he'll average in the low 90s.
I wouldn't have a clue what he'll average. certainly in the 90s but not sure. But Supercoach in 2014 might be the worst year in its history for premium forward picks.

Rockliff, Martin, Stevie J, J Lewis may only be categorised as MIDs

Bartel and A. walker may be categorised as DEFs

Cox, N Riewoldt, B Harvey, Chapman, Petrie, Pavlich are on the wrong side of 30

Cloke is Cloke and Westhoff is Westhoff

Roughead is most likely going to get N1 defender each week and the same attention as Buddy got

I don't see buddy and Tippett's scoring well consistently in the same forward line as they will be taking points off each other.

Nic Nat may just be a Ruck, not sure here.

Rioli, R Gray, D Thomas, Hawkins are injury prone.

None of what i have said might come true but if it does . . . it is going to be a long year for Forwards.

and now gunston is looking good.

(also there are a few names mentioned that aren't "premium forwards", just mentioned them to add emphasis)
 
Joined
16 Mar 2012
Messages
3,547
Likes
611
AFL Club
Carlton
I wouldn't have a clue what he'll average. certainly in the 90s but not sure. But Supercoach in 2014 might be the worst year in its history for premium forward picks.

Rockliff, Martin, Stevie J, J Lewis may only be categorised as MIDs

Bartel and A. walker may be categorised as DEFs

Cox, N Riewoldt, B Harvey, Chapman, Petrie, Pavlich are on the wrong side of 30

Cloke is Cloke and Westhoff is Westhoff

Roughead is most likely going to get N1 defender each week and the same attention as Buddy got

I don't see buddy and Tippett's scoring well consistently in the same forward line as they will be taking points off each other.

Nic Nat may just be a Ruck, not sure here.

Rioli, R Gray, D Thomas, Hawkins are injury prone.

None of what i have said might come true but if it does . . . it is going to be a long year for Forwards.

and now gunston is looking good.

(also there are a few names mentioned that aren't "premium forwards", just mentioned them to add emphasis)
Stevie J must be a pure mid next season given he basically never played fwd. Bartel and Walker can't possibly be listed as fwds either based on this season.

Martin played fwd heaps - he'll definitely be a mid/fwd. Rockliff was a fwd quite a bit early in the season so will stay as a m/f unless they weigh the end of the season more, which is possible. Lewis is questionable but I think he'll stay as a dpp.

Agree there probably won't be many great options. If players are categorised how I expect then the top 10 defenders will score similarly to the top 10 fwds.
 
Joined
12 Oct 2013
Messages
2,924
Likes
267
AFL Club
Bulldogs
Martin played fwd heaps - he'll definitely be a mid/fwd. Rockliff was a fwd quite a bit early in the season so will stay as a m/f unless they weigh the end of the season more, which is possible.
If martin and rockliff are categorised as MID/FWD then LOCK. It will be very interesting to see what happens with the forwards and defenders. this might be the year to spend more in defense if there are the additions of mcviegh, mitchell, walker, bartel.
 
Joined
22 Aug 2012
Messages
3,920
Likes
1,621
AFL Club
Collingwood
There wasn't to many fwd rookies this year yo start round 1. Macaffer, and a port youngster, neade maybe?.
mid pricers/ discounted players: jjk and monfries.

I think next year there will be more fwd rookies to select for round 1 so there would be more funds for the backline if your willing to go with a few rookies up fwd.
some great discounted players in defence next year.
yum yum
 
Joined
12 Oct 2013
Messages
2,924
Likes
267
AFL Club
Bulldogs
There wasn't to many fwd rookies this year yo start round 1. Macaffer, and a port youngster, neade maybe?.
mid pricers/ discounted players: jjk and monfries.

I think next year there will be more fwd rookies to select for round 1 so there would be more funds for the backline if your willing to go with a few rookies up fwd.
some great discounted players in defence next year.
yum yum
The defense and forward structure may change in 2014 - with forwards being stocked with rookies and having 3 or 4 premiums. while defense has a lot of discounted players and less rookies.
 

tracygrims

250 Games Club
Joined
17 Apr 2013
Messages
1,236
Likes
62
AFL Club
Richmond
RE: JWö
I'm going to guess two Adelaide players in Walker and Dangerfield are going to be members of next years cookie cutter forwardline.
Martin, Naitinui and Rockliff are fairly safe to keep their F-tag as well which leaves only one spot for a J. Gunston, a healthy C. Dixon, D. Thomas or a rejuvinated C. Sylvia.. ;)
 
Joined
9 Mar 2012
Messages
10,824
Likes
16,276
AFL Club
Adelaide
RE: JWö
I'm going to guess two Adelaide players in Walker and Dangerfield are going to be members of next years cookie cutter forwardline.
Martin, Naitinui and Rockliff are fairly safe to keep their F-tag as well which leaves only one spot for a J. Gunston, a healthy C. Dixon, D. Thomas or a rejuvinated C. Sylvia.. ;)
Yeah i was think Dangerfield spent a fair bit of time moving forward this year, will be interesting to see if he regains dpp status next season, if he does then Lock.
 

Nk29

Captain
Joined
16 Sep 2012
Messages
5,595
Likes
96
AFL Club
Geelong
RE: JWö
I'm going to guess two Adelaide players in Walker and Dangerfield are going to be members of next years cookie cutter forwardline.
Martin, Naitinui and Rockliff are fairly safe to keep their F-tag as well which leaves only one spot for a J. Gunston, a healthy C. Dixon, D. Thomas or a rejuvinated C. Sylvia.. ;)
CD won't give Dangerfield DPP, just like Ablett didn't get it in '10 when he kicked 48 goals for the season.
 

Philzsay

Leadership Group
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
10,459
Likes
15,016
AFL Club
Essendon
Cox, N Riewoldt, B Harvey, Chapman, Petrie, Pavlich are on the wrong side of 30
With so few premium forwards to choose from I reckon their is a fair chance at least one of the above can end the season in the top 6 forwards for the year.

The trick of course is picking which one plus deciding if the risk of trying to pick the right one is worth it.
 
Joined
12 Oct 2013
Messages
2,924
Likes
267
AFL Club
Bulldogs
With so few premium forwards to choose from I reckon their is a fair chance at least one of the above can end the season in the top 6 forwards for the year.
Depending on price and preseason form i think i'll only be looking at cox and n riewoldt
 

Demolished

100 Games Club
Joined
13 Jun 2013
Messages
757
Likes
45
AFL Club
St Kilda
Cox, N Riewoldt, B Harvey, Chapman, Petrie, Pavlich
Petrie would be a good POD out of that list. Pretty consistent this year, flew way under the radar and Kangas midfield is on its way to becoming elite if it isn't already, especially now they acquired Dal Santo, an elite user.
 
Top