Wow you're really bullish on Farrar huh?
Do you know if he plays lock down KPD as suggested on fanfooty? And why was his DT:SC ratio so poor from last game?
He's playing as a 3rd/4th tall. It's more that he's played two excellent games and really looks to have cemented a few bad games worth in the team, be incredibly rough if he got dropped after one bad game given his last two, especially his clinic on Heeney who he beat soundly and is one of the best mid sized forwards in the league.
Last game he suffered from lock down defender who scored once the game was over, unfortunately there are no points for smashing your man and stopping him, Hibberd copped the same thing despite being just about the best player on the field for Melbourne with the way he pulled Dusty's pants down. Farrar got some cheap touches late.
My biggest fear on Farrar though is he did too well in the lockdown gig on Heeney and is probably going to get stuck in that role now and less rebound. The positive is he's a very good runner and looks a very good kick. Physically he reminds me of Nathan Wilson in his running/kicking.
Honestly don't think there is much between Atu and Farrar, they're essentially the same thing to me, even the teams are playing similar high possession styles in defense. I think Robertson has more explosive scoring capability but his JS in a really strong team is going to be a lot shakier, as evidenced by already having been dropped. Macrae right now offers a cheaper price but has to date shown the worst job security, role and scoring potential of the 4, that 50k+ really needs to have some genuine utility for him to be the stronger pick or some strong indicator he's going to have a different role.
Very similar spot to me with Flynn at R2. I'm likely to continue without Gawn so long as Flynn is named solo ruck, any funny buggers with Mumford/Briggs into the side and that's me done. Dunkley will become Gawn, and Campbell to Farrar.
You're not tempted to plug Marshall in as a stop gap until a possible lower score from Gawn? (Wishful thinking I know).
If Flynn is named, I can afford Campbell/Dunkley to Zorko/Sidey but I'm really struggling to wrap my head around Sidey's prospects from here in such a bad side...
Zero interest in Marshall right now. With the two injuries he's had this year and Ryder to return I want to wait a solid month on him, that he has zero value in the byes as cover for Gawn and Grundy adds to the no rush factor. Saints have looked terrible so far so need to see how he's going to go as a forward assuming Ryder rucks. Injury, role and scoring concerns is way too many red flags given it's Gawn I'd be taking on. Much rather find a bargain forward/back/mid later if I run out of cash with Gawn than be stuck without Gawn.
He looked good but he's a young KPF in a mediocre side and his great score is going to be in the mix for a week. He's a textbook zero reason to rush into him this week. There were like 2 decent other rookies last week so not like there is a flood of targets that would force you to go early on him.
Any thoughts on ditching Dusty this week and buying him back cheaper in a few weeks?
(24 trades with 16 keepers and 6 rookies to upgrade - bye structure is set up too)
Two trades to generate like 50k is horrible economics. Unless you somehow don't have any of Chapman, Neale, Dunkley, Gulden, Campbell, Warner, Sharp and Waterman who make far more sense to be trading it just seems very wasteful and even if you don't have any of them and everything is perfect, it just seems wasteful.