Opinion Questions For Rowsus

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
14 Jul 2020
Messages
1,192
Likes
2,132
AFL Club
Collingwood
Hey BH,
the only rule is, that I don't do rate my team type questions.
It's a tricky question, and not because of the number of options you present, but more because, the answer really depends on where you stand now, and where you want to go from here.
Are you League oriented, and have a tough need to win match this week?
Do you feel there will be a shortage of Rookies to come, making downgrades hard to achieve in the following weeks?
Are you sitting on a pile of cash?
Do you think we are looking at a season where compromises will need to be made, and risks taken?
The answer to these questions, and maybe a few more, could potentially change which option you take this week!
For a start, we have 3 or 4 pretty strong looking bubble boys this week. In your scenarios above, you only take one of them. Maybe like some, you went early on Poulter last week, but even if you did, there's a pretty good push, that you should go double downgrade this week, and grab two of the others. It would seem unlikely, that we will have downgrade options as strong as these guys, in the next few Rounds!
If that doesn't fit your agenda, and you are locked into one of the options above, then ....

Option 1
Bowes
$484,300 BE 85 Ave 103.8 - having somewhat of a breakout season, and his price has dropped back to only $33k above where it started. The worrying thing is, his 2 best scores were Rounds 1 and 2, and he has only averaged 95 since then, which is about what he is priced to score.
Weitering $498,000 BE 41 Ave 97.8 - would even be here, if he hadn't scored 156 last week? Probably not. He's never gone over 75 in a season, and is now priced close to 100. I'm not sure he fits any job description you are looking for, other than a Hail Mary POD maybe.
Docherty $534,000 BE 98 Ave 104.4 - looked better 2 of the last 3 weeks. I think he faced a really big hurdle this season, and still potentially does. The combination of multiple knees and testicular cancer has to have some affect on his ability to see out a strong season. Can he go 105+ from here, all the way to the end? It's possible, but I have my doubts.
Lloyd $558,800 BE 112 Ave 107.4 - SC Royalty the past 3 seasons, and probably the safest of these 4 options. The question is, if you think we might be struggling to fund a full team this season, then $560k is a big chunk of change!!!

Bowes the value pick Lloyd the safe pick, if you think you can fully fund your team from here.

Option 2
Sloane
$523,500 BE 70 Ave 114.3 - known to miss multiple games in a season. Averaged 88, 103, 97 the past 3 seasons, and his good scores this season were when Adelaide fired at home early on. I think he\s 103 player with the risk of missed games. Not for me.
Mitchell $525,800 BE 60 Ave 107.3 - finally got a decent DT to SC ratio last week. Apart from 2019's broken leg, he hasn't missed a game since 2015. Averages over the past 3 seasons 114, 129, 119. Not sure I would consider Sloane over him, unless you were desperate for POD's.
Ellis $522,500 BE Ave 99.9 - Averaging 100, and his history says he's a 100 player. No interest when he's the same price as Mitchell.

Mitchell easy, and every time!

Option 3
Impey
$451,100 BE 78 Ave 98.2 - surprisingly still only in 33% of teams, I thought he'd be close to 50% by now. Priced below his average, but his scoring can be up and down. 64, 74, 84 mixed in with 5 x 100+ scores. Averaging 113 in those 100+ games. If he can continue in the mid to high 90's he still represents value.
Marshall $533,700 BE 124 Ave 93.8 - I think he could prove to be a pretty useful player in the run home, but I'm also convinced we'll get him cheaper. Shares a bye with Gawndy, which is problematic. Yes plan to get him, but not yet.
Hall $419,500 BE 30 Ave 79.3 - seems to be a bit of the flavour of the month. Has averaged 117 in his past 3 non-injury affected games. Hasn't averaged over 79 in the past 3 seasons. Has 2 injury affected games, and a missed game already this season. He's a very high risk selection, but given injuries to Anderson, Stephenson and to a lesser extent, McDonald and Tyson, Hall really has a chance to shine for the next few weeks. I'm not sure he's a long term prospect, and in aseason where we are all burning trades, that's a worry, but he has the potential to give you a quick point boost, and possibly a $100-$150k along the way.
Sidebottom $495,500 BE 117 Ave 86.6 - Usually averages around or just over 100, and that's usually on the back of a couple of monster scores. Outside of those couple of games, he averages around 90, like he is now. Does he still the monsters in him? Can he stay on the park? Both those things make him a risk in my eyes.

Plan to get Marshall, but not yet. Grab Hall if you haven't smashed through your trades, as he'll probably need to be traded out again, otherwise get Impey.

Decision.
Not sure I like finishing your Def line yet. If you do need to make some compromises, D6 is a good place to start! This might not matter, if you are holding Highmore and another deadwood Rookie, and you are worried about coverage. If you are happy with your trade count situation, take a punt on Hall, but I reckon he's 4 to 6 weeks at most, then he could become a liability again. Otherwise, choose between Mitchell and Impey. It might come down to what your coverage and depth is like, and where you are leaking the most points. Gun to head, without knowing anything more than I do, go Impey, as it leaves you some cash for next week!
Ok cool,
Thank you massively, Sorry again for the tricky question, but yeah you seemed to answer it perfectly in my eyes(y)
 
Joined
31 Mar 2019
Messages
2,318
Likes
7,865
AFL Club
West Coast
Greetings Rows,

I posted something similar in this week's trades thread but in this case I would love your opinion as I'm still torn on which way to go and basically been sitting on the fence the entire week. It's a crucial decision.

Not sure whether to do 1 upgrade & 1 downgrade or 2 downgrades this week. Got 20 trades remaining with 55k in bank.
Based on the rookies in my team below do you think there will be a struggle for cash generation for the remaining 7 upgrades? If so, I was going to do Gulden & Warner to RCD & Poulter. Otherwise I was thinking Gulden & Warner to Poulter & a premo up to 545k. Will have to skip RCD. Unfortunately my D6 is a donut this week.

Def: Murphy (L.Jones, Highmore)
Mids: Powell, Jordon, A.Scott, (McNeil, Gulden, Sharp)
Rucks: (Flynn)
Fwds: Warner, Bergman, H.Jones (McCreery, Brockman)

Thanks :)



EDIT: OMG! Highmore is BACK! No donut in D6!
 
Last edited:
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,810
AFL Club
Collingwood
Greetings Rows,

I posted something similar in this week's trades thread but in this case I would love your opinion as I'm still torn on which way to go and basically been sitting on the fence the entire week. It's a crucial decision.

Not sure whether to do 1 upgrade & 1 downgrade or 2 downgrades this week. Got 20 trades remaining with 55k in bank.
Based on the rookies in my team below do you think there will be a struggle for cash generation for the remaining 7 upgrades? If so, I was going to do Gulden & Warner to RCD & Poulter. Otherwise I was thinking Gulden & Warner to Poulter & a premo up to 545k. Will have to skip RCD. Unfortunately my D6 is a donut this week.

Def: Murphy (L.Jones, Highmore)
Mids: Powell, Jordon, A.Scott, (McNeil, Gulden, Sharp)
Rucks: (Flynn)
Fwds: Warner, Bergman, H.Jones (McCreery, Brockman)

Thanks :)
I am definitely not Rowsus 😀

Allow yourself $ 500k conservative figure (mids closer to $ 525-550k) for each upgrade you bring in (you need 7) , less the current value of the players you are upgrading will give you how much $$$ you need to upgrade.

Obviously these onfield rookies hopefully still rise in $.

Then look at your bench and which players you get value trading down , at the moment McNeil , Gulden , Flynn & McCreery (hopefully)

Use $ 125k as the player you bring in.

Will we even have viable downgrades after this Round ?

That will then give you a answer to how much $$$ you still need to find for 7 premium upgrades.

You may find your 7 onfield rookies & 4 rookies to trade out still need to rise by about $ 350-500k combined to make it all work.
 
Joined
18 Mar 2012
Messages
2,908
Likes
2,565
AFL Club
Essendon
Hey Old mate hope your traveling well,
Im tossing up between Lloyd or Mitchell this week (Tex and Kosi out )

Having 3 mid spots left im wodering if i finish my Def with Lloyd now and then save the 3 mid spots for the likes of Macrae, Steele, Neale ?
with mitchell being in the next bracket of players with likes of petracca and co ?
H rnd9trades.png
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,131
Likes
64,895
AFL Club
Melbourne
Greetings Rows,

I posted something similar in this week's trades thread but in this case I would love your opinion as I'm still torn on which way to go and basically been sitting on the fence the entire week. It's a crucial decision.

Not sure whether to do 1 upgrade & 1 downgrade or 2 downgrades this week. Got 20 trades remaining with 55k in bank.
Based on the rookies in my team below do you think there will be a struggle for cash generation for the remaining 7 upgrades? If so, I was going to do Gulden & Warner to RCD & Poulter. Otherwise I was thinking Gulden & Warner to Poulter & a premo up to 545k. Will have to skip RCD. Unfortunately my D6 is a donut this week.

Def: Murphy (L.Jones, Highmore)
Mids: Powell, Jordon, A.Scott, (McNeil, Gulden, Sharp)
Rucks: (Flynn)
Fwds: Warner, Bergman, H.Jones (McCreery, Brockman)

Thanks :)



EDIT: OMG! Highmore is BACK! No donut in D6!
Hi Rumb,
sorry for missing this question. Busy at work, and QFR disappeared off the front page, so I thought there were no new questions.
My advice would have been to go a double downgrade this week, as there looked to be no good downgrade targets for next week.
I hope whichever way you went, worked out best for you.
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,131
Likes
64,895
AFL Club
Melbourne
Hey Old mate hope your traveling well,
Im tossing up between Lloyd or Mitchell this week (Tex and Kosi out )

Having 3 mid spots left im wodering if i finish my Def with Lloyd now and then save the 3 mid spots for the likes of Macrae, Steele, Neale ?
with mitchell being in the next bracket of players with likes of petracca and co ?
H View attachment 29909
Hey Maso, old mate. Sorry I missed this question. With work, and QFR disappearing off the front page, I didn't think I had any questions waiting for me.
I would have advised Lloyd. Your Mids currently aren't too shaky, as far as players to safely play on field are concerned. Your Defs however D5-8 of Kosi, Murphy, Mansell, Highmore, there isn't even much loop value there, when you can loop them. Even with Lloyd coming, your D6 is a much bigger problem than your M9. I'd suggest getting your team to a position, where you are not reliant on those you currently have at D5-8 to take the field at all, asap.
I hope it worked out for you.
 
Joined
18 Mar 2012
Messages
2,908
Likes
2,565
AFL Club
Essendon
Hey Maso, old mate. Sorry I missed this question. With work, and QFR disappearing off the front page, I didn't think I had any questions waiting for me.
I would have advised Lloyd. Your Mids currently aren't too shaky, as far as players to safely play on field are concerned. Your Defs however D5-8 of Kosi, Murphy, Mansell, Highmore, there isn't even much loop value there, when you can loop them. Even with Lloyd coming, your D6 is a much bigger problem than your M9. I'd suggest getting your team to a position, where you are not reliant on those you currently have at D5-8 to take the field at all, asap.
I hope it worked out for you.
all good mate i went Lloyd and think I will go Ridley next week leaving Laird in midfield eventually i will move sharp to def bench to be able to move laid around when needed.
 
Joined
31 Mar 2019
Messages
2,318
Likes
7,865
AFL Club
West Coast
Hi Rumb,
sorry for missing this question. Busy at work, and QFR disappeared off the front page, so I thought there were no new questions.
My advice would have been to go a double downgrade this week, as there looked to be no good downgrade targets for next week.
I hope whichever way you went, worked out best for you.
No worries bud!
I ended up going with my instinct and went 1 up and 1 down as I had a difficult H2H matchup this week that I really wanted to win. As it stands, I'm on track for the win but it's kinda bittersweet as it's looking like I might've won even if I went with the double downgrade!
Missed the first price rise of RCD but I might just make the tough decision of getting him in before round 10 starts! Still hoping he can at least make 120k from here. Anything more is a bonus.
 
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
425
Likes
358
Hi TommyGobbler,
it's certainly something I take into consideration. The same principal from pre-season still applies for me. The higher the players ownership, the more convinced I need to be, that they'll be a good pick, before I trade them in. When someone has ownership as high as Dusty's, I'm more likely to sit back, and see what happens. Yes, I might miss the boat, but it's also possible I might make a gain on 65-70% of the Coaches, too. I'm not changing my mind on Dusty being a sub 110 player, on the back of 2 games information. I'm happy to see where it goes, while a great quantity of people trading Neale or Cripps out, are likely to push Dusty's ownership up to that 70% mark!!!
Mills having that one good score shouldn't put you off him. You have him pegged for 105 from here, and his low ownership means if you have him, and he exceeds your estimate, it is a really good win! Mills has more upside than Dusty, in my eyes. He's in the back end of the break out window, where as Dusty's scoring pattern seems pretty well set, outside of any potential spike season/s.
Hey Rowsus,

Good time to revisit this one. Dusty has bottomed out at $425k. What impact does ownership (59%) have on your decision in this scenario? I'm assuming that the ownership matters less when he is priced below his expected average (~95avg I'm guessing) and well below the price that most current owners paid, but keen to hear your thoughts.
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,131
Likes
64,895
AFL Club
Melbourne
Hey Rowsus,

Good time to revisit this one. Dusty has bottomed out at $425k. What impact does ownership (59%) have on your decision in this scenario? I'm assuming that the ownership matters less when he is priced below his expected average (~95avg I'm guessing) and well below the price that most current owners paid, but keen to hear your thoughts.
Hey TG,
in a normal year, I'd still roll the dice, and avoid him. He's going to be getting up around 65-70% ownership in the next 2 weeks, and I'd rather bet against him at those odds, than bet on him.
The problem is, who else do we fill our Forward lines with????!!!
He might just become a necessary evil, unfortunately.
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,260
AFL Club
Sydney
Hey Rowsus,

Good time to revisit this one. Dusty has bottomed out at $425k. What impact does ownership (59%) have on your decision in this scenario? I'm assuming that the ownership matters less when he is priced below his expected average (~95avg I'm guessing) and well below the price that most current owners paid, but keen to hear your thoughts.
Given your position I'd absolutely be grabbing him because right now first doesn't have him and that guys got a really strong team and is absolutely the guy to chase until he isn't! So in effect you're creating what could be a positive POD on the guy you're chasing and closing what could be a negative POD on the chasing pack. That said, I'd be pretty surprised if first doesn't bring in Martin this week given I believe he's double downed last week (Poulter/RCD) and should be cashed up.
 
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
425
Likes
358
Given your position I'd absolutely be grabbing him because right now first doesn't have him and that guys got a really strong team and is absolutely the guy to chase until he isn't! So in effect you're creating what could be a positive POD on the guy you're chasing and closing what could be a negative POD on the chasing pack. That said, I'd be pretty surprised if first doesn't bring in Martin this week given I believe he's double downed last week (Poulter/RCD) and should be cashed up.
Yeah looking at his team I'd say he's odds on to bring in Dusty.

If Nathan Murphy gets a game I'll be tempted to field him for a week and bring in a premium mid instead of Dusty. Just don't know what other forward premo id target later on instead of Dusty, there are really no other options I like.
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,770
Likes
26,260
AFL Club
Sydney
Yeah looking at his team I'd say he's odds on to bring in Dusty.

If Nathan Murphy gets a game I'll be tempted to field him for a week and bring in a premium mid instead of Dusty. Just don't know what other forward premo id target later on instead of Dusty, there are really no other options I like.
You're in a great spot where you don't have to take stupid risks like my poor soul which will be tested with some of my targets the next few weeks!

Realistically some good bye management and you're right up there and I'd be more concentrated on making sure you get that right than anything else right now. Really easy to make 300 points in the byes with good planning and management and more than an ounce of luck!
 
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
425
Likes
358
You're in a great spot where you don't have to take stupid risks like my poor soul which will be tested with some of my targets the next few weeks!

Realistically some good bye management and you're right up there and I'd be more concentrated on making sure you get that right than anything else right now. Really easy to make 300 points in the byes with good planning and management and more than an ounce of luck!
Thanks mate. Yeah I feel like I'm set up pretty well for the bye rounds so fingers crossed I gain some points. Also fingers crossed Brayshaw only misses one week!
 
Joined
8 Feb 2018
Messages
1,239
Likes
2,365
Hi Rowsus,

Hope you’re well.

I was just looking to get your thoughts on trading in value premos sooner compared to holding out for the top/Uber premos.

For example in my midfield I’m missing the likes of Guthrie, Steele and Oliver and can probably get to them once some of my rookies have fatten out more (like RCD and Jones). The alternative would be looking at a Adams/Cerra for example in the next round or two.

Basically in this scenario it becomes Oliver/Steele/Guthrie from round 16 onwards or Cerra/Adams from round 12 onwards.
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,131
Likes
64,895
AFL Club
Melbourne
Hi Rowsus,

Hope you’re well.

I was just looking to get your thoughts on trading in value premos sooner compared to holding out for the top/Uber premos.

For example in my midfield I’m missing the likes of Guthrie, Steele and Oliver and can probably get to them once some of my rookies have fatten out more (like RCD and Jones). The alternative would be looking at a Adams/Cerra for example in the next round or two.

Basically in this scenario it becomes Oliver/Steele/Guthrie from round 16 onwards or Cerra/Adams from round 12 onwards.
Hi Pieman17,
I think a lot depends on how your cash Gen and trades are holding up. I would think most people would struggle to generate enough cash, to build a full proper Prem team this season, and as such, will have either 2 to 4 compromised picks, or some REALLY weak D6 or F6 types.
If you're unsure how that might apply to you, I suggest going with a combination of value picks, and top shelf picks, until the picture becomes clearer.
It can also be a slightly different answer depending on your season goal. Main League or ranking?
If it's main league, and the top 2 or 3 teams look really well placed, you might have to chance your arm on getting some top shelf picks in.
Good luck!
 
Joined
28 Jun 2012
Messages
5,408
Likes
3,683
AFL Club
Bulldogs
I have the cash to go f.macrae and Parks for steele and l.jones resulting in keeping powell and warner. It would mean id probably hold onto powell until after all the byes, and warner to his bye. Also ridding 2 dead rookies who help nothing, don't even need their donuts as I have sharp and highmore.

Is it worth it?
 
Joined
26 Jun 2019
Messages
280
Likes
1,170
AFL Club
Collingwood
Hi Rowsus.

Popping my cherry here! I look at the bye rounds as a collective. What would be the ideal total points target to gain rank in your opinion?
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,131
Likes
64,895
AFL Club
Melbourne
I have the cash to go f.macrae and Parks for steele and l.jones resulting in keeping powell and warner. It would mean id probably hold onto powell until after all the byes, and warner to his bye. Also ridding 2 dead rookies who help nothing, don't even need their donuts as I have sharp and highmore.

Is it worth it?
Looking at your team, you don't have a lot of deadwood. Unless you need to hold Powell for your bye numbers, I'd be inclined to trade out Powell and Warner before they drop in value. You don't look in danger of a donut, so maintain and build your team value.
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,131
Likes
64,895
AFL Club
Melbourne
Hi Rowsus.

Popping my cherry here! I look at the bye rounds as a collective. What would be the ideal total points target to gain rank in your opinion?
Hi kadog,
I generally set a nice round 6,000 as a target. This year being a little trickier and tougher, I'd probably settle for 5,800 ....... unless I was up near the pointy end, then I'd still want my 6,000.
I think there will be more teams than most years, that cop multiple donuts during the byes. It could be a great opportunity for those well placed in their structure, to make great leaps in the Rankings!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top