Strategy Round 11: Trades
- Thread starter Connoisseur
- Start date
- Joined
- 17 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 1,436
- Likes
- 2,961
- Joined
- 21 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 4,202
- Likes
- 6,469
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I've had him for 3 weeks. Got him in after he'd gone 60-60-130. Thought I'd get some short term cash gen as the 130 rolled through.
Since I've had him he's also gone 60-60-130
The question is, do we expect that's about his level. Which gives you an average of 83, with spike scores making up the majority of the good side, and rubbish scores the rest. Or are those 60s because he was working into form after a layoff, and he's more likely to go 80s here with the occasional 130 or even 150.
He has a high top end, and I am sure we won't get consistency, and he will miss games. But if you can loop him at F7 you might end up with some big scores occasionally.
I've given up on him as a cash gen piece for a bye slingshot. Mainly because there's no obvious option. If Danger is back and fallen in price though it might work
Since I've had him he's also gone 60-60-130
The question is, do we expect that's about his level. Which gives you an average of 83, with spike scores making up the majority of the good side, and rubbish scores the rest. Or are those 60s because he was working into form after a layoff, and he's more likely to go 80s here with the occasional 130 or even 150.
He has a high top end, and I am sure we won't get consistency, and he will miss games. But if you can loop him at F7 you might end up with some big scores occasionally.
I've given up on him as a cash gen piece for a bye slingshot. Mainly because there's no obvious option. If Danger is back and fallen in price though it might work
- Joined
- 17 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 1,436
- Likes
- 2,961
The issue with him is not his form, its his role and also durability. You can go over his CBA attendances and there's a strong correlation between it and his good scores. With Brayshaw out on the weekend, he had a number of CBA attendances (namely he was playing on the ball) and thus scored well. Brayshaw will be back this week so.....
If Fyfe's foot issue becomes something more serious, touch wood it doesn't, you could possibly consider Walters but if you do pick him you have to be sure he's going to get on-ball time else you're locking in a player who will have a lot of mediocre scores.
If Fyfe's foot issue becomes something more serious, touch wood it doesn't, you could possibly consider Walters but if you do pick him you have to be sure he's going to get on-ball time else you're locking in a player who will have a lot of mediocre scores.
- Joined
- 17 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 1,436
- Likes
- 2,961
This is fair. We don't really have a data-set on this as yet, given the amount of time Heeney has played midfield historically (even in a pinch-hit capacity), but having Franklin in that team possibly does help Heeney a bit in terms of scoring. So I think if you're betting on Heeney you should not only be looking at his durability but Franklin's as well. Franklin takes up a lot of focus from opposing defences, as it should, leaving less focus on Heeney.
For the record, I think it’s madness trading Carra in too.
Midfield ‘ins’ at this point of the season should be exclusively guys you’re expecting to go 110+ (hopefully discounted but happy to pay full freight for others)
No idea why you’d want a probably list clogger at M8, even if he is 400k. Totally different story if he had Fwd eligibility.
Midfield ‘ins’ at this point of the season should be exclusively guys you’re expecting to go 110+ (hopefully discounted but happy to pay full freight for others)
No idea why you’d want a probably list clogger at M8, even if he is 400k. Totally different story if he had Fwd eligibility.