It wouldn't really be a fair representation of my team if I have Brandon Ellis and Sam Taylor and claim I have the same number of premiums as someone who has Sicily and Sinclair instead. I think it's fair enough to differentiate between actual premiums (players who don't need to improve their average to be good picks) vs. players $100k cheaper that you need significant improvement out of.to be keepers.
You can say that because if he’s got Sinclair and Sicily he has to get the money from somewhere
He’s likely got two $500k players to your $600k elsewhere
Keep it simple. I’ve seen groups talk in terms of price ranges to take the subjective labels out,
One years’ “true premium” is next year’s Tom Mitchell for example. It’s all subjective and only really known once the season is over.
In fact Sinclair is a great example, he’s only done it once like so is he a “true premium”?
See how it’s gets too subjective, too hard