Discussion 2023 Round 13: Teams & In Game Discussion

What was your final score?

  • Less than 1900

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 1900 - 1949

    Votes: 1 1.1%

  • 1950 - 1999

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 2000 - 2049

    Votes: 6 6.9%

  • 2050 - 2099

    Votes: 11 12.6%

  • 2100 - 2149

    Votes: 23 26.4%

  • 2150 - 2199

    Votes: 30 34.5%

  • 2200 - 2249

    Votes: 15 17.2%

  • 2250 - 2299

    Votes: 1 1.1%

  • More than 2300

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    87
F

frosty1

#1,268
Joined
23 Mar 2019
Messages
2,131
Likes
7,021
#1,268
Manikato1 said:
Should I take Johnson's 96 instead of fielding Walsh. Carlton are a carton of pickled poo at the moment and I do not want another 72 in my best 18.
Click to expand...
Carlton are bound to lift vs Essendon. 72 is bottom end for Walsh, 150 is top end. In either case what's #19 in your scores? If it's 96 vs 88 I'd be inclined to go Walsh. If it's 96 vs 50 (with Walsh to try and beat that) then maybe you could lock in the safe score
 
Zimmer

Zimmer

#1,270
Joined
10 Feb 2014
Messages
11,375
Likes
21,228
AFL Club
Essendon
#1,270
GrainFedBeef said:
Depends upon what you need re how many players you have this round.

If you have >20 and a 60 is meaningless, put Ford on. Has shown a high ceiling although last game role was deeper.

If you want a safer 60-70, the Cincotta has done that more often.
Click to expand...
I've got 23 available. Taking Johnson's score in the mids - opponent has both Cincotta and Ford on the ground.

So far I have a 72, 68, 62 hoping I can get to drop out.
 
GrainFedBeef

GrainFedBeef

#1,271
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
4,890
Likes
11,150
AFL Club
West Coast
#1,271
Zimmer said:
I've got 23 available. Taking Johnson's score in the mids - opponent has both Cincotta and Ford on the ground.

So far I have a 72, 68, 62 hoping I can get to drop out.
Click to expand...
Ford then. Shown an ability to go large and would a risk if he score like his first two rounds. Expect Cincotta on % gives a better score, yet this is more a tagging role for you Zimmer.
 
Raaraab

Raaraab

#1,272
Joined
3 Jun 2014
Messages
422
Likes
1,901
AFL Club
St Kilda
#1,272
Raaraab said:
14/1676
Sheezel, Briggs, Green, Coniglio, Cincotta, NDaicos (C) to play
Another bad choice of VC, i.e. Dawson, considering I also had Laird in the same game as well as 5 others who scored 120 plus, so nervous wait on NDaicos playing, otherwise Coniglio.
Gulden and Lloyd/Mitchell in drop zone.
Click to expand...
Crunch time.. do I put the C on Coniglio or roll the dice with NDaicos that either he won’t be a late out or illness affected?
 
Manikato1

Manikato1

#1,274
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,760
Likes
11,757
AFL Club
West Coast
#1,274
frosty1 said:
Carlton are bound to lift vs Essendon. 72 is bottom end for Walsh, 150 is top end. In either case what's #19 in your scores? If it's 96 vs 88 I'd be inclined to go Walsh. If it's 96 vs 50 (with Walsh to try and beat that) then maybe you could lock in the safe score
Click to expand...
I have 21 on field but three of those include Gulden 62, Weddle and Smitch. Of the possible low enders to come have Cincotta, Ford and JVR.
 
Connoisseur

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
#1,280
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,960
Likes
126,626
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
#1,280
Manikato1 said:
Should I take Johnson's 96 instead of fielding Walsh. Carlton are a carton of pickled poo at the moment and I do not want another 72 in my best 18.
Click to expand...
22 Disposals in RD12 put an end to a 29 game streak of 25+ disposals. Are you expecting this to continue and/or Essendon to negate his influence?

Which situation would you prefer to lose on (Walsh benched or Walsh fielded) and which do you expect there to be a greater variance?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top