NT: I thought it was SC tradition to have a bit of a go at people who traded into and broke your premiums. It's all good natured enough and there usually isn't any malice in it as we all know it's just superstition. Usually... And it's really hard for me to type this coz the b-----s went and ruined Doc for me... I mean... Ya know... <breathes deeply> It's all kumbaya, man.
If anything, they cancelled out my negative POD with Docherty this week. Theoretically, I should thank them. It's the ones that jumped onto (let's say) Ridley and scored themselves a 140 that I'm spewing about. They're the ones who reeled in the deficit. But thankfully, we have competitors who started worse, jumped on our bus and who then haven't been able to gain any ground on us.
On a more serious note, we have a premium who has failed to fire early. This game was bad but his first was also a bit anaemic considering he's a senior player, playing an important position in a drawn match. There was a 130 in the offing for him against the Tiges and he struggled to 108. So that's 2 weeks that he has properly underperformed. For 600k of our precious starting balance, we need better results so this is costly to us.
Every year, this site notes that the list of back premiums gets overturned from year to year. And every year we take a punt or two on spending up big on last year's back premiums. This year, one of them got injured early - fair enough, you can't predicct that. Another (Dawson) couldn't meet his starting price as a backman in a loss and a third (Doc) is running around like he still thinks it's preseason.
The questions now become, "how long will it take for Doc to pull the finger out and and what stage do we lose patience and cut our losses?" I got Doc in because of his ability to score; the lack of Zac Williams in the rebounding role, and their early draw being conducive to a half back scoring well and he hasn't yet fired a shot.