BBL|12: Combined SCS Team
- Thread starter Ironhawk
- Start date
Ok, sticking with Short as VC (was pretty sure we would).
Happy to do Webster to Head as previously suggested, but not entirely sold on Head if they bat second - would rather wait a round personally if they do. Seems the most popular trade in though, so not going to change it.
E currently on Clarke, Lynn and Labuschagne.
Do we do a second trade now? What are we looking at in terms of Rd 12/13 DGR numbers?
Just over 40 mins.
Happy to do Webster to Head as previously suggested, but not entirely sold on Head if they bat second - would rather wait a round personally if they do. Seems the most popular trade in though, so not going to change it.
E currently on Clarke, Lynn and Labuschagne.
Do we do a second trade now? What are we looking at in terms of Rd 12/13 DGR numbers?
Just over 40 mins.
I’m inclined to hang on to Wade rather than Clarke.
Clarke doesn’t have a double, whereas Wade should do. In the event that Wade keeps missing in the near term, he should be usable as a loop (he plays game 3, 3, 2 in the rounds before his double).
Wade is also the better player. Clarke has been consistent but not shown much ceiling this season, surprisingly. He scored 162 on a double in R1, and hasn’t gone above 64 since then. I would take a 64 most of the time, but it’s probably not the type of ceiling I’d hold a player for. No doubt he could go higher, but I’d probably want more evidence of it happening recently to plan around keeping him.
Clarke doesn’t have a double, whereas Wade should do. In the event that Wade keeps missing in the near term, he should be usable as a loop (he plays game 3, 3, 2 in the rounds before his double).
Wade is also the better player. Clarke has been consistent but not shown much ceiling this season, surprisingly. He scored 162 on a double in R1, and hasn’t gone above 64 since then. I would take a 64 most of the time, but it’s probably not the type of ceiling I’d hold a player for. No doubt he could go higher, but I’d probably want more evidence of it happening recently to plan around keeping him.
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2014
- Messages
- 1,128
- Likes
- 4,812
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Here's something I've come up with, feel free to add to it.
So round 12(Perth and Heat)
Marnus
Tye
Hardie
Bancroft
Inglis
Agar
Potential trade in targets
Khawaja?
Neser
Round 13 players
Ellis
Mcdermott
Wade if keep
Potential trade in targets
Shadab(if back)
Wade otherwise
David?
Dooley (if back)
Meredith
Warner/Davies for good single against Stars
So round 12(Perth and Heat)
Marnus
Tye
Hardie
Bancroft
Inglis
Agar
Potential trade in targets
Khawaja?
Neser
Round 13 players
Ellis
Mcdermott
Wade if keep
Potential trade in targets
Shadab(if back)
Wade otherwise
David?
Dooley (if back)
Meredith
Warner/Davies for good single against Stars
Last edited:
Has anyone suggested an in for which there is meaningful support that isn’t listed in the poll?
If not, I think there’s a good argument that we should just be getting Usman and Carey. They should bat high and are playing on a good deck, arguably both against pretty poor attacks. Usman doesn’t have the second strong but does have the double.
I’m a bit concerned that if we don’t trade now, we may be waiting for someone who is not worth waiting for (?).
If not, I think there’s a good argument that we should just be getting Usman and Carey. They should bat high and are playing on a good deck, arguably both against pretty poor attacks. Usman doesn’t have the second strong but does have the double.
I’m a bit concerned that if we don’t trade now, we may be waiting for someone who is not worth waiting for (?).
I would suggest Clarke and (for now) Agar.
I am looking at trading out Agar myself. Slightly surprising ahead of a double, but he scored 89 in a double first up, and has scored 37-62 in singles ever since. He’s averaging a tick under 40 and doesn’t really warrant a spot for 2x40 in a few rounds’ time if I’m struggling for outs.
Importantly, most of the outs can be updated later. It seems like it’s the ins that we need to lock in for game one, so I’m keen to not miss good (and popular) in candidates just because we haven’t bedded down outs.
I am looking at trading out Agar myself. Slightly surprising ahead of a double, but he scored 89 in a double first up, and has scored 37-62 in singles ever since. He’s averaging a tick under 40 and doesn’t really warrant a spot for 2x40 in a few rounds’ time if I’m struggling for outs.
Importantly, most of the outs can be updated later. It seems like it’s the ins that we need to lock in for game one, so I’m keen to not miss good (and popular) in candidates just because we haven’t bedded down outs.
Just doing my loops as well and have very similar.
I’m considering fielding Marnus and Eing Head, just in case Head goes low with the bat and doesn’t bowl. Head will seemingly be higher ownership I think.
[Head will probably have decent opportunity to bowl with that attack, but Marnus historically bowls around 3 overs a game in recent seasons.]
I’m considering fielding Marnus and Eing Head, just in case Head goes low with the bat and doesn’t bowl. Head will seemingly be higher ownership I think.
[Head will probably have decent opportunity to bowl with that attack, but Marnus historically bowls around 3 overs a game in recent seasons.]