You'll be playing with the bare XI (if Thornton remains out) with those set of trades and only the one Hurricanes.
There's a Charlie Wakim ($44,100) available if you have a spare 5k ITB.
He allows me to do this for my team.
Yeah I've already come to terms with the fact that I'll be running with at least one of them missing. Still trying to figure out the best way to zag, but it won't be by bringing them both in.
Long way out but if that Friday game (Round 9) has weather concerns that could cause issues for Smith (and other Sixers and Thunder players that people own) , possible look at them as E's
Depending on how everyone is set up they might need to rely on fielding more Hurricanes than they like.
Obviously a lot harder sitting in your position , half the margin this round between the leader and yourself , then go into Round 9 still with a fighting chance
I'm going VC Cane into Short, so I can E Warner. But looking at the stats, plenty are VCing Warner and he is in great form, so there is a lot of validity in that option too.
I'm going VC Cane into Short, so I can E Warner. But looking at the stats, plenty are VCing Warner and he is in great form, so there is a lot of validity in that option too.
Without a clear-cut cane option, I'm thinking I'll go option 2 - Plus Adelaide is pretty much a road, so SURELY whichever one picked in that game can go well...
I think the second option (which is what I’m doing). Warner would have to go huge to take his score. You give yourself more upside with the second alternative.
I'm going VC Cane into Short, so I can E Warner. But looking at the stats, plenty are VCing Warner and he is in great form, so there is a lot of validity in that option too.