News Injuries & Suspensions

Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
409
Likes
1,889
AFL Club
Richmond
View: https://twitter.com/tommorris32/status/1712288779736916190

I saw these rumours circulating all over Twitter this morning and appears to be somewhat real (some idiots were spreading that he died).

Given that the club don't know the full picture just yet I would say something untoward has happened here?

Hope Clarry is alright. Poor bloke has been through a storm the last few weeks. Will wait for more info before I make any more concrete statements though.
 
Joined
9 Aug 2012
Messages
40,923
Likes
154,193
AFL Club
Carlton
View: https://twitter.com/tommorris32/status/1712288779736916190

I saw these rumours circulating all over Twitter this morning and appears to be somewhat real (some idiots were spreading that he died).

Given that the club don't know the full picture just yet I would say something untoward has happened here?

Hope Clarry is alright. Poor bloke has been through a storm the last few weeks. Will wait for more info before I make any more concrete statements though.
Might have been the mushrooms he ate at the Gawn residence. 😉
 
Joined
9 May 2012
Messages
2,913
Likes
8,942
Finally!!

https://x.com/superfooty/status/1714086840859525413?s=20



AFL CBA: Clubs required to be more transparent with injuries in league crackdown
The time of Geelong having a player on its injury list with no return date, or a club making a late change with no explanation, is over. Here’s why.


AFL clubs have been told they must provide more transparent information about injured players as the league also rapidly expands media access as part of its new CBA deal.
Clubs including Geelong had a host of players with ailments on their official injury list but no specific return date this year, which gave the fans little guidance about their likely return to AFL football.
The league had told clubs it would crack down and, as part of the new collective bargaining agreement, there are a host of new guidelines and rules for clubs.
The AFL rule states: “Clubs must ensure that all medical information issued to the media is credible, responsible, and specific in terms that are meaningful to teams, media, and fans. This includes the information in the weekly injury reports and information on injuries announced to the media during matches.”

Clubs are also told that within 15 minutes of a player leaving the ground with an injury mid-game the match broadcaster must be updated on the status of that injury.
The information should include the specific nature of the injury – hamstring or quad, left leg or right – and the likelihood of them returning during that match.
Clubs will also have to make their football bosses available to the broadcaster and media after teams are lodged to explain late changes or injury hiccups.
While many teams are excellent in providing information to match-day broadcasters and media to be relayed to fans, other clubs are more secretive or unwilling to help.

The league’s new media policy, as written under the CBA, demands every AFL coach is available to the match-day broadcaster at half time and pre-match, with all players available to the broadcaster from 90 minutes before the bounce.


The AFLPA and AFL have also agreed upon a new policy which means every player who took part in the previous week’s game must be available for interviews the next week.
The new AFL rule states a club will make available “its playing group, including substitutes, from the previous round to accredited media for a minimum of 45 minutes within 2 days (extended by one day in the event of a player or football department day off) of the conclusion of the Match.
The AFL and players have agreed growing football revenue through promotion can only help both parties, with players receiving a percentage of every AFL dollar earned.

 
Joined
13 Jun 2022
Messages
5,406
Likes
17,662
AFL Club
St Kilda
Finally!!

https://x.com/superfooty/status/1714086840859525413?s=20



AFL CBA: Clubs required to be more transparent with injuries in league crackdown
The time of Geelong having a player on its injury list with no return date, or a club making a late change with no explanation, is over. Here’s why.


AFL clubs have been told they must provide more transparent information about injured players as the league also rapidly expands media access as part of its new CBA deal.
Clubs including Geelong had a host of players with ailments on their official injury list but no specific return date this year, which gave the fans little guidance about their likely return to AFL football.
The league had told clubs it would crack down and, as part of the new collective bargaining agreement, there are a host of new guidelines and rules for clubs.
The AFL rule states: “Clubs must ensure that all medical information issued to the media is credible, responsible, and specific in terms that are meaningful to teams, media, and fans. This includes the information in the weekly injury reports and information on injuries announced to the media during matches.”

Clubs are also told that within 15 minutes of a player leaving the ground with an injury mid-game the match broadcaster must be updated on the status of that injury.
The information should include the specific nature of the injury – hamstring or quad, left leg or right – and the likelihood of them returning during that match.
Clubs will also have to make their football bosses available to the broadcaster and media after teams are lodged to explain late changes or injury hiccups.
While many teams are excellent in providing information to match-day broadcasters and media to be relayed to fans, other clubs are more secretive or unwilling to help.

The league’s new media policy, as written under the CBA, demands every AFL coach is available to the match-day broadcaster at half time and pre-match, with all players available to the broadcaster from 90 minutes before the bounce.


The AFLPA and AFL have also agreed upon a new policy which means every player who took part in the previous week’s game must be available for interviews the next week.
The new AFL rule states a club will make available “its playing group, including substitutes, from the previous round to accredited media for a minimum of 45 minutes within 2 days (extended by one day in the event of a player or football department day off) of the conclusion of the Match.
The AFL and players have agreed growing football revenue through promotion can only help both parties, with players receiving a percentage of every AFL dollar earned.

This is welcome news indeed! and well overdue from a SC perspective, how many people got burned by that Tom Stewart thing last season and the stringing along of Oliver owners to the point where it really damaged their seasons.
 
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
409
Likes
1,889
AFL Club
Richmond
Finally!!

https://x.com/superfooty/status/1714086840859525413?s=20



AFL CBA: Clubs required to be more transparent with injuries in league crackdown
The time of Geelong having a player on its injury list with no return date, or a club making a late change with no explanation, is over. Here’s why.


AFL clubs have been told they must provide more transparent information about injured players as the league also rapidly expands media access as part of its new CBA deal.
Clubs including Geelong had a host of players with ailments on their official injury list but no specific return date this year, which gave the fans little guidance about their likely return to AFL football.
The league had told clubs it would crack down and, as part of the new collective bargaining agreement, there are a host of new guidelines and rules for clubs.
The AFL rule states: “Clubs must ensure that all medical information issued to the media is credible, responsible, and specific in terms that are meaningful to teams, media, and fans. This includes the information in the weekly injury reports and information on injuries announced to the media during matches.”

Clubs are also told that within 15 minutes of a player leaving the ground with an injury mid-game the match broadcaster must be updated on the status of that injury.
The information should include the specific nature of the injury – hamstring or quad, left leg or right – and the likelihood of them returning during that match.
Clubs will also have to make their football bosses available to the broadcaster and media after teams are lodged to explain late changes or injury hiccups.
While many teams are excellent in providing information to match-day broadcasters and media to be relayed to fans, other clubs are more secretive or unwilling to help.

The league’s new media policy, as written under the CBA, demands every AFL coach is available to the match-day broadcaster at half time and pre-match, with all players available to the broadcaster from 90 minutes before the bounce.


The AFLPA and AFL have also agreed upon a new policy which means every player who took part in the previous week’s game must be available for interviews the next week.
The new AFL rule states a club will make available “its playing group, including substitutes, from the previous round to accredited media for a minimum of 45 minutes within 2 days (extended by one day in the event of a player or football department day off) of the conclusion of the Match.
The AFL and players have agreed growing football revenue through promotion can only help both parties, with players receiving a percentage of every AFL dollar earned.

I'm glad they specifically mentioned Geelong in this one - they were easily the most egregious offender when it came to providing ambiguous timelines or no timelines at all for player injuries. Happy with these changes!
 
Joined
15 Mar 2019
Messages
15,463
Likes
59,812
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Finally!!

https://x.com/superfooty/status/1714086840859525413?s=20



AFL CBA: Clubs required to be more transparent with injuries in league crackdown
The time of Geelong having a player on its injury list with no return date, or a club making a late change with no explanation, is over. Here’s why.


AFL clubs have been told they must provide more transparent information about injured players as the league also rapidly expands media access as part of its new CBA deal.
Clubs including Geelong had a host of players with ailments on their official injury list but no specific return date this year, which gave the fans little guidance about their likely return to AFL football.
The league had told clubs it would crack down and, as part of the new collective bargaining agreement, there are a host of new guidelines and rules for clubs.
The AFL rule states: “Clubs must ensure that all medical information issued to the media is credible, responsible, and specific in terms that are meaningful to teams, media, and fans. This includes the information in the weekly injury reports and information on injuries announced to the media during matches.”

Clubs are also told that within 15 minutes of a player leaving the ground with an injury mid-game the match broadcaster must be updated on the status of that injury.
The information should include the specific nature of the injury – hamstring or quad, left leg or right – and the likelihood of them returning during that match.
Clubs will also have to make their football bosses available to the broadcaster and media after teams are lodged to explain late changes or injury hiccups.
While many teams are excellent in providing information to match-day broadcasters and media to be relayed to fans, other clubs are more secretive or unwilling to help.

The league’s new media policy, as written under the CBA, demands every AFL coach is available to the match-day broadcaster at half time and pre-match, with all players available to the broadcaster from 90 minutes before the bounce.


The AFLPA and AFL have also agreed upon a new policy which means every player who took part in the previous week’s game must be available for interviews the next week.
The new AFL rule states a club will make available “its playing group, including substitutes, from the previous round to accredited media for a minimum of 45 minutes within 2 days (extended by one day in the event of a player or football department day off) of the conclusion of the Match.
The AFL and players have agreed growing football revenue through promotion can only help both parties, with players receiving a percentage of every AFL dollar earned.

Sounds good in principle, I expect it will still get abused, with clubs not being fully transparent. A one week injury will end up as 5 and vice versa. It definitely sounds a much needed improvement.

I am not sure about this next bit though:

The league’s new media policy, as written under the CBA, demands every AFL coach is available to the match-day broadcaster at half time and pre-match, with all players available to the broadcaster from 90 minutes before the bounce.

Does this mean the broadcaster can run onto the field and interview players mid match? Or on the sidelines mid match? Interesting. I would expect a lot of players would not want to be interviewed 2 mins pre-game, but this allows it.
 
Joined
22 Feb 2013
Messages
9,669
Likes
20,537
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Sounds good in principle, I expect it will still get abused, with clubs not being fully transparent. A one week injury will end up as 5 and vice versa. It definitely sounds a much needed improvement.

I am not sure about this next bit though:

The league’s new media policy, as written under the CBA, demands every AFL coach is available to the match-day broadcaster at half time and pre-match, with all players available to the broadcaster from 90 minutes before the bounce.

Does this mean the broadcaster can run onto the field and interview players mid match? Or on the sidelines mid match? Interesting. I would expect a lot of players would not want to be interviewed 2 mins pre-game, but this allows it.
They exist for our entertainment!!!!
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
39,519
Likes
128,639
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Finally!!

https://x.com/superfooty/status/1714086840859525413?s=20



AFL CBA: Clubs required to be more transparent with injuries in league crackdown
Clubs are also told that within 15 minutes of a player leaving the ground with an injury mid-game the match broadcaster must be updated on the status of that injury.
The information should include the specific nature of the injury – hamstring or quad, left leg or right – and the likelihood of them returning during that match.
 
Joined
9 Aug 2012
Messages
40,923
Likes
154,193
AFL Club
Carlton
EXCLUSIVE
AFL drug bombshell: Player from Melbourne-based finals team returns positive test
The AFL has been rocked after a player from a Melbourne-based finals team returned a positive drug test. Mark Robinson has the exclusive details.
Mark Robinson

Follow

@Robbo_heraldsun


A player from a Melbourne-based finals team has tested positive to drugs late in the home and away season.
A urine sample taken from the player after a game in the weeks leading up to the AFL finals returned positive for a banned substance, believed to be cocaine.
It’s understood the player took the drug just days out from a home and away match.

He was tested after the game by Sports Integrity Australia officials as part of regulation in-competition testing for performance enhancing drugs.
The result of the test wasn’t known until after the finals series.
A source close to the issue said the player was from a Melbourne club involved in the finals, which means he would play for either the Demons, Collingwood, Carlton or St Kilda.
The results of player’s A sample has only been known for a couple of days.
It’s believed Sports Integrity Australia has informed the player he has returned a positive test.
The AFL complies with WADA’s anti-doping code, which is governed in Australia by SIA, and cocaine is listed on the WADA in-competition prohibited list of stimulants.

The AFL on Thursday confirmed the positive test.
“The AFL is working with the player on this matter,” a spokesperson said.
The penalty for an “in competition” positive test is up to four years’ suspension, although there are provisions for a lesser penalty in some situations.
While a four-year suspension is possible, under the AFL’s anti-doping code, if the player can prove the violation was not intentional or there are other circumstances, the penalty could be reduced to as little as a month.
The code was updated on January 1, 2021, whereby “an athlete who has tested positive to a Substance of Abuse’ in-competition (which includes cocaine), the sanction is only three months if the athlete can prove the substance was used out of competition and was unrelated to sporting performance’’.
AFL rules dictate that the “in-competition” period starts at “11:59pm on the day before a competition in which the athlete is scheduled to participate through the end of such competition and the sample collection process’’.
Also, a suspension could be reduced to one month if the ‘’athlete completes a Substance of Abuse treatment program approved by AFL’’.
In 2019, Collingwood’s Sam Murray argued that he had inadvertently ingested a tiny amount of cocaine before he was given an 18-month suspension.
In 2020, former Gold Coast ruckman Brayden Crossley accepted a 12-month suspension for an unintentional anti-doping violation.
In 2015, then Collingwood players Lachie Keeffe and Josh Thomas accepted two-year bans for testing positive to the drug clenbuterol.
They were tested in February of that year, which was out of competition.
More recently, Willie Rioli, when he was at the Eagles, was suspended for two years after being found guilty of substituting his urine during two anti-doping drugs tests.








 
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
409
Likes
1,889
AFL Club
Richmond
EXCLUSIVE
AFL drug bombshell: Player from Melbourne-based finals team returns positive test
The AFL has been rocked after a player from a Melbourne-based finals team returned a positive drug test. Mark Robinson has the exclusive details.
Mark Robinson

Follow
@Robbo_heraldsun

A player from a Melbourne-based finals team has tested positive to drugs late in the home and away season.
A urine sample taken from the player after a game in the weeks leading up to the AFL finals returned positive for a banned substance, believed to be cocaine.
It’s understood the player took the drug just days out from a home and away match.

He was tested after the game by Sports Integrity Australia officials as part of regulation in-competition testing for performance enhancing drugs.
The result of the test wasn’t known until after the finals series.
A source close to the issue said the player was from a Melbourne club involved in the finals, which means he would play for either the Demons, Collingwood, Carlton or St Kilda.
The results of player’s A sample has only been known for a couple of days.
It’s believed Sports Integrity Australia has informed the player he has returned a positive test.
The AFL complies with WADA’s anti-doping code, which is governed in Australia by SIA, and cocaine is listed on the WADA in-competition prohibited list of stimulants.

The AFL on Thursday confirmed the positive test.
“The AFL is working with the player on this matter,” a spokesperson said.
The penalty for an “in competition” positive test is up to four years’ suspension, although there are provisions for a lesser penalty in some situations.
While a four-year suspension is possible, under the AFL’s anti-doping code, if the player can prove the violation was not intentional or there are other circumstances, the penalty could be reduced to as little as a month.
The code was updated on January 1, 2021, whereby “an athlete who has tested positive to a Substance of Abuse’ in-competition (which includes cocaine), the sanction is only three months if the athlete can prove the substance was used out of competition and was unrelated to sporting performance’’.
AFL rules dictate that the “in-competition” period starts at “11:59pm on the day before a competition in which the athlete is scheduled to participate through the end of such competition and the sample collection process’’.
Also, a suspension could be reduced to one month if the ‘’athlete completes a Substance of Abuse treatment program approved by AFL’’.
In 2019, Collingwood’s Sam Murray argued that he had inadvertently ingested a tiny amount of cocaine before he was given an 18-month suspension.
In 2020, former Gold Coast ruckman Brayden Crossley accepted a 12-month suspension for an unintentional anti-doping violation.
In 2015, then Collingwood players Lachie Keeffe and Josh Thomas accepted two-year bans for testing positive to the drug clenbuterol.
They were tested in February of that year, which was out of competition.
More recently, Willie Rioli, when he was at the Eagles, was suspended for two years after being found guilty of substituting his urine during two anti-doping drugs tests.








Well, damn. Feel like there's a few names that could be floated around here...
 
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
409
Likes
1,889
AFL Club
Richmond
Wondering what's with the suspense and why not just name who it is?
"Player from Melbourne based finals team", just say the name sheesh!
Agreed. Super weird, but maybe it might be someone who was just recently re-signed or even traded and that's why they're a bit hush-hush.

It would almost be too easy if it was Ginnivan at this point, so I'm going with someone else.
 
Joined
9 Aug 2012
Messages
40,923
Likes
154,193
AFL Club
Carlton
Could be him, or Oliver/Hunter? Time will tell.
Actually I retract, article names Smith. Joel Smith.
Sorry must have deleted the 1st part of the article as I was clearing other data that was irrelevant.

Melbourne’s Joel Smith has tested positive to drugs late in the home and away season.
A urine sample taken from Smith after a game in the weeks leading up to the AFL finals returned positive for a banned substance, believed to be cocaine.

Smith tested positive after the round 23 game against Hawthorn.
 
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
409
Likes
1,889
AFL Club
Richmond
Actually I retract, article names Smith. Joel Smith.
Sorry must have deleted the 1st part of the article as I was clearing other data that was irrelevant.

Melbourne’s Joel Smith has tested positive to drugs late in the home and away season.
A urine sample taken from Smith after a game in the weeks leading up to the AFL finals returned positive for a banned substance, believed to be cocaine.

Smith tested positive after the round 23 game against Hawthorn.
Well, there you go. Any ideas on how long he'll get? I imagine since it wasn't intentional, he might land a 12 month ban?
 
Top