Opinion Questions For Rowsus
- Thread starter Rowsus
- Start date
- Status
Rowsus,
One of my friends wants to bring in Cutler into his DEF, and has to choose between getting rid of either:
1. A playing DEF rookie (i.e.: Langdon or McDonald), or
2. A dead DEF rookie (Clurey)
Should he leave the dead rookie on the bench (as trading one of the other two will make him some money), or should he finally get rid of the dead weight?
One of my friends wants to bring in Cutler into his DEF, and has to choose between getting rid of either:
1. A playing DEF rookie (i.e.: Langdon or McDonald), or
2. A dead DEF rookie (Clurey)
Should he leave the dead rookie on the bench (as trading one of the other two will make him some money), or should he finally get rid of the dead weight?
Hey Rowsus, I'm sure you're familiar with this weeks rookie dilemma, and was looking for advice:
Trading Ellis out to Lloyd (via Martin) would mean my forwardline is weakened and I'd be forced to play Lloyd, which you'd expect would cost me a reasonable amount of points. This also means I would have to bench one of Crouch/Tyson/Dunstan with Tyson i think the clear choice for bench, although I'm with the belief that Tyson will still make more money. The question is, is it worth having Tyson on the bench if I think Crouch will score higher, since I could be cashing in more right now for him (instead of Ellis)?
Cheers
Trading Ellis out to Lloyd (via Martin) would mean my forwardline is weakened and I'd be forced to play Lloyd, which you'd expect would cost me a reasonable amount of points. This also means I would have to bench one of Crouch/Tyson/Dunstan with Tyson i think the clear choice for bench, although I'm with the belief that Tyson will still make more money. The question is, is it worth having Tyson on the bench if I think Crouch will score higher, since I could be cashing in more right now for him (instead of Ellis)?
Cheers
Hi Rowsus
Can you please help?
Cannot decide what to do this week?
B: Mitchell, Swallow, McVeigh,Jaensch,McDonald, Langdon (Langford,Laidler)
M:Ablett, Beams, Libba, Murphy, Polec, Tyson, Dunstan, Crouch (Buckley, Ellis)
R: Minson, Sandi (currie, Thurlow)
F: Martin, Danger, Pav, Zorko, Fasalo, Higgins (Taylor, JHK )
$380k 24 trades
Need it improve mids and look at offloading these rookies
Do I go Ellis to Lloyd/via Taylor or to Robertson then upgrade Tyson to Swan/pendles ?
Or do I go Ellis to Lloyd /Robertson and upgrade Higgins ?
Just can't decide. Would like Pendles or Riewoldt but wouldn't that be waste of cash ?
Can you please help?
Cannot decide what to do this week?
B: Mitchell, Swallow, McVeigh,Jaensch,McDonald, Langdon (Langford,Laidler)
M:Ablett, Beams, Libba, Murphy, Polec, Tyson, Dunstan, Crouch (Buckley, Ellis)
R: Minson, Sandi (currie, Thurlow)
F: Martin, Danger, Pav, Zorko, Fasalo, Higgins (Taylor, JHK )
$380k 24 trades
Need it improve mids and look at offloading these rookies
Do I go Ellis to Lloyd/via Taylor or to Robertson then upgrade Tyson to Swan/pendles ?
Or do I go Ellis to Lloyd /Robertson and upgrade Higgins ?
Just can't decide. Would like Pendles or Riewoldt but wouldn't that be waste of cash ?
- Joined
- 21 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 4,202
- Likes
- 6,469
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Hi Rowsus,
I was looking at/helping my son with his team earlier today and he wanted to upgrade in the mids but didn't have enough cash for the player/s he was interested in.
On looking for other options for him we came upon N Jones.
He didn't make the trade but this has me thinking.
He hasn't played less than 20 games since his first season (2006).
His best average in that time is 97.5 (2012).
He is currently averaging 113.5 and is priced at $ 502,200.
I don't follow the demons closely and had not considered him before today (although was unhappily impressed with his game against Murph in round4).
Do you think he will revert to his average or has the new coach changed his role and the teams game enough that he can continue averaging 110-115 making him good enough for a top 10 mid (currently ranked 10 for points scored/14th average points per game).
If he continues to average 110-115 per game this is probably good enough for M8.
What are your thoughts on N Jones?
I was looking at/helping my son with his team earlier today and he wanted to upgrade in the mids but didn't have enough cash for the player/s he was interested in.
On looking for other options for him we came upon N Jones.
He didn't make the trade but this has me thinking.
He hasn't played less than 20 games since his first season (2006).
His best average in that time is 97.5 (2012).
He is currently averaging 113.5 and is priced at $ 502,200.
I don't follow the demons closely and had not considered him before today (although was unhappily impressed with his game against Murph in round4).
Do you think he will revert to his average or has the new coach changed his role and the teams game enough that he can continue averaging 110-115 making him good enough for a top 10 mid (currently ranked 10 for points scored/14th average points per game).
If he continues to average 110-115 per game this is probably good enough for M8.
What are your thoughts on N Jones?
Hi Slammer,
sorry I'm late on the scene, just got up (6.54am here).
I would have suggested going Swan, and hopefully you did.
Riewoldt is overpriced, and Pendles is sitting high, but not as bad a use of cash as Riewoldt right now.
My choice would have been Ellis to Lloyd via Taylor and Tyson to Swan.
I hope it works out for you.
sorry I'm late on the scene, just got up (6.54am here).
I would have suggested going Swan, and hopefully you did.
Riewoldt is overpriced, and Pendles is sitting high, but not as bad a use of cash as Riewoldt right now.
My choice would have been Ellis to Lloyd via Taylor and Tyson to Swan.
I hope it works out for you.
Hi blue,
he's a gun, no doubt, and he is getting some help in the engine room this year, which has made the difference. I'm just not confident it will continue at that level. He could easily fall back to 100-105 for the rest of the season. He's a risk, and a POD, but not for me. I do love watching him play though, he's so good in heavy traffic, and has been for years now.
he's a gun, no doubt, and he is getting some help in the engine room this year, which has made the difference. I'm just not confident it will continue at that level. He could easily fall back to 100-105 for the rest of the season. He's a risk, and a POD, but not for me. I do love watching him play though, he's so good in heavy traffic, and has been for years now.
- Status