Position Rate My Team - SC Now Open
- Thread starter I am Cursed :(
- Start date
- Status
I just swapped Parker For Danger, Sloane for JPK, then got rid of Brodie Smith and put Andrew McGrath there then Dylan shiel in my mid. Also i got rid of Jaeger and got Bontempelli and Marc Murphy for Swallow, lastly i swapped Caddy for Hugh McCluggage. Are these good swaps? need someone good for Smith $6k in the bank or keep him and hope he steps up with his VC role in Hawthorn which I hope he does.
Here's my side prior to the JLT. It's somewhat similar to Ben Beast's side but I've gone a bit more value in the midfield. It's interesting to see what the money got for both of us.
Rance, Adams, Laird, Keefe, Hampton, Newman (EVW, Ryan)
Danger, Pendles, Bont, Fyfe, Heppell, Beams, Swallow, Myers (SPP, Barrett, M.Hibberd (D/M))
Gawn, Sandi (Strndica)
Dahlhaus, Macrae, Heeney, Roughy, Knight, Pickett (Rioli, Eddy)
Bank: $16k
Laird is the one player that seems to never leave my defence. Adams is that start or forget type pick with his injury history. I really like him as a choice this season so rather than be tempted to trade him in, I figure it's better to start him. Rance will be in my side before his R12 bye, just a question of whether I start him or trade him in. If the forward rookies struggle in the JLT he might become Deledio which adds more risk but he's the only other forward option I'm happy to start.
Danger, Pendles, Fyfe is a combo most of us seem to be starting. Bont vs Treloar is a tough call for me. Bont wins at this stage as my gut feel is that he's going to be a top 6 mid this season in the Fyfe mould playing in a top 4 side. Also I'm hesitant taking 3 pies mids. Finally Bont provides good loophole opportunities in R4-6 when I can't loop Danger/Fyfe. Alternatively, I could sacrifice Swallow and use the change to upgrade Beams to Treloar. Beams + Swallow vs Treloar/Prem mid + Rookie has had some good discussion recently. At this stage subject to how good the mid rookies are, I'm in the Beams + Swallow camp due to the potential +30ppg benefit. I'm also liking Heppell at his price point - happy to carry him through the season at M8 if he goes 105 @ 22 games with a small chance of going at 109-110 (some might want a bit more out of that spot though!). He is the compromise that allows me to squeeze in Gawn.
Gawn + Sandi is my likely starting structure. I have a few concerns on Goldy personally this season re his knee, north's decline & prospect of Pruess getting games in a rebuild. Although I agree Gawn is overpriced, he gives me a bit more confidence in my R1. All seasons I have done poorly is when I have messed up my rucks, and I'm worried Goldy might do a S.Martin last season (although plenty of experienced coaches are more confident on him). Sandi a lock at R2 for me. Could beat Goldy/Grundy for the number 2 ruck mantle, otherwise I can trade him to Grundy/Goldy whoever is the better choice. Have considered Witts at R3. Very valuable cover but have preferred starting Roughy/Swallow at this stage for on-field points.
Dahl + Macrae the locks. Heeney the breakout candidate with the hope he goes 95+ with more mid time. Roughy is in at this stage as all signs in the off-season are very promising. He was in my draft sides in 2016 before his injury. Nervous with even just one basement rookie at F6. Hopefully the three candidates perform well, otherwise I will consider a structural change!
Also planning to start just the one FD this season but might consider a second one at M11 if a Petracca type option pops up (ie: misses early & gets games during the byes). Based on my research & what freowho/BB have said so far, a freo rookie is a must (either Strndica or Deluca M/F). He can be partnered with a melb rookie to maximise loopholes (ie: Maynard M/F or King). Interested in how Deluca progresses as potentially a Petracca type option.
Tear it apart!
Rance, Adams, Laird, Keefe, Hampton, Newman (EVW, Ryan)
Danger, Pendles, Bont, Fyfe, Heppell, Beams, Swallow, Myers (SPP, Barrett, M.Hibberd (D/M))
Gawn, Sandi (Strndica)
Dahlhaus, Macrae, Heeney, Roughy, Knight, Pickett (Rioli, Eddy)
Bank: $16k
Laird is the one player that seems to never leave my defence. Adams is that start or forget type pick with his injury history. I really like him as a choice this season so rather than be tempted to trade him in, I figure it's better to start him. Rance will be in my side before his R12 bye, just a question of whether I start him or trade him in. If the forward rookies struggle in the JLT he might become Deledio which adds more risk but he's the only other forward option I'm happy to start.
Danger, Pendles, Fyfe is a combo most of us seem to be starting. Bont vs Treloar is a tough call for me. Bont wins at this stage as my gut feel is that he's going to be a top 6 mid this season in the Fyfe mould playing in a top 4 side. Also I'm hesitant taking 3 pies mids. Finally Bont provides good loophole opportunities in R4-6 when I can't loop Danger/Fyfe. Alternatively, I could sacrifice Swallow and use the change to upgrade Beams to Treloar. Beams + Swallow vs Treloar/Prem mid + Rookie has had some good discussion recently. At this stage subject to how good the mid rookies are, I'm in the Beams + Swallow camp due to the potential +30ppg benefit. I'm also liking Heppell at his price point - happy to carry him through the season at M8 if he goes 105 @ 22 games with a small chance of going at 109-110 (some might want a bit more out of that spot though!). He is the compromise that allows me to squeeze in Gawn.
Gawn + Sandi is my likely starting structure. I have a few concerns on Goldy personally this season re his knee, north's decline & prospect of Pruess getting games in a rebuild. Although I agree Gawn is overpriced, he gives me a bit more confidence in my R1. All seasons I have done poorly is when I have messed up my rucks, and I'm worried Goldy might do a S.Martin last season (although plenty of experienced coaches are more confident on him). Sandi a lock at R2 for me. Could beat Goldy/Grundy for the number 2 ruck mantle, otherwise I can trade him to Grundy/Goldy whoever is the better choice. Have considered Witts at R3. Very valuable cover but have preferred starting Roughy/Swallow at this stage for on-field points.
Dahl + Macrae the locks. Heeney the breakout candidate with the hope he goes 95+ with more mid time. Roughy is in at this stage as all signs in the off-season are very promising. He was in my draft sides in 2016 before his injury. Nervous with even just one basement rookie at F6. Hopefully the three candidates perform well, otherwise I will consider a structural change!
Also planning to start just the one FD this season but might consider a second one at M11 if a Petracca type option pops up (ie: misses early & gets games during the byes). Based on my research & what freowho/BB have said so far, a freo rookie is a must (either Strndica or Deluca M/F). He can be partnered with a melb rookie to maximise loopholes (ie: Maynard M/F or King). Interested in how Deluca progresses as potentially a Petracca type option.
Tear it apart!
That 7 deep midfield stands out to me. It's too early I know to really have a useful debate on that one, until we are clearer on the rookies. If it comes to a cull being needed either because rookies aren't showing up in other lines or a mid rookies are demanding selection would you sacrifice Heppell? Keefe at D4, Hampton D5 ... who knows if that will hold up.
My draft teams are stopping at 6 deep mids and running 4 prems in def and forward as a tentative structure so I don't get myself too set on that extra prem mid. Happy to go 7 deep if it's necessary.
What's made you take Rough over Bennell at the same price? I'd back in the midfielder over the KPP at any price point.
My draft teams are stopping at 6 deep mids and running 4 prems in def and forward as a tentative structure so I don't get myself too set on that extra prem mid. Happy to go 7 deep if it's necessary.
What's made you take Rough over Bennell at the same price? I'd back in the midfielder over the KPP at any price point.
All good comments. It no doubt is a bit early to discern the appropriate structure. I have read positive comments on Keefe & Hampton early which makes me a bit more confident going thinner in the defence. You are right in that Heppell probably does move to another line if rookies in other lines don't pop up. Heppell, JJ & Deledio all at similar price points.
Rough over Bennell purely due to the fact Rough's been in full training since December and Bennell will be in mid-late Feb. Bennell the higher scoring potential, but as I've got a few riskier picks in Adams, Beams and maybe also Deledio, I've gone the more stable option in Rough.
Rough over Bennell purely due to the fact Rough's been in full training since December and Bennell will be in mid-late Feb. Bennell the higher scoring potential, but as I've got a few riskier picks in Adams, Beams and maybe also Deledio, I've gone the more stable option in Rough.
I have to say that the 3 Prem defence is almost a no brainer for me. McGrath, Scharenberg, Keefe, Hampton, Vicker-wills are all really solid back rookies.
Combine this with the fact that there are so many defenders around the same price point, I think it is a good idea to start thinner in defence and let them sort themselves out.
B18-i like your side. There are certain selections I disagree with, but overall I like the structure. My only worry is there's only 10 players I would have complete confidence in saying will be keepers at the end. I'd be looking to chop Beams and upgrade someone in the forwards (maybe Roughead)? But even that is personal preference. Definitely a good base!
Combine this with the fact that there are so many defenders around the same price point, I think it is a good idea to start thinner in defence and let them sort themselves out.
B18-i like your side. There are certain selections I disagree with, but overall I like the structure. My only worry is there's only 10 players I would have complete confidence in saying will be keepers at the end. I'd be looking to chop Beams and upgrade someone in the forwards (maybe Roughead)? But even that is personal preference. Definitely a good base!
Unfortunately, Martin has the potential to ruin your season. Watch closely, but if Martin plays with Smith, has to go imo. Just setting yourself up for disaster.
Burgoyne is a good pick, and someone that no-one is really chattering about too loudly, but I feel Hurley at D3 leaves you a little exposed. Potentially, all 3 of your defenders don't live up to expectation.
The midfield is way too strong imo. I'd like to see O'Meara down to a Berry, and then Martin and Hurley to reliable premiums. This all just my opinion though!
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 1,292
- Likes
- 268
Hey bb
I really like your side. The feedback that has given to you is spot on. I think you have gone a little deep in the back line and I would suggest cutting McDonald. I think it's ok to have a couple of risk players and Adams and sandi r your choice. They have both shown to go big in the past. Your team is dependant on the rookies. Hopefully you will be able to get decent priced rookies that fit your structure. At this stage the jury is out on Heeney. I'm personally sitting on the fence on him however if roughie is fit and healthy he will be decent pick.
I really like your side. The feedback that has given to you is spot on. I think you have gone a little deep in the back line and I would suggest cutting McDonald. I think it's ok to have a couple of risk players and Adams and sandi r your choice. They have both shown to go big in the past. Your team is dependant on the rookies. Hopefully you will be able to get decent priced rookies that fit your structure. At this stage the jury is out on Heeney. I'm personally sitting on the fence on him however if roughie is fit and healthy he will be decent pick.
Slip V2
G n R strategy
Cripps subject to fitness.
D: Rance Adams Laird McGrath Berry Newman* (Ryan Stewart)
M: Danger Pendles JPK Selwood Cripps Fyfe SPP Myers (Wigg Hibberd Williams)
R: Gawn Sandi (Pruess)
F: Dalhouse McRae Roughy McCluggage Knight McKay (Rioli Eddy)
$100K IN BANK
Any comments appreciated.
G n R strategy
Cripps subject to fitness.
D: Rance Adams Laird McGrath Berry Newman* (Ryan Stewart)
M: Danger Pendles JPK Selwood Cripps Fyfe SPP Myers (Wigg Hibberd Williams)
R: Gawn Sandi (Pruess)
F: Dalhouse McRae Roughy McCluggage Knight McKay (Rioli Eddy)
$100K IN BANK
Any comments appreciated.
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 1,292
- Likes
- 268
Personally, I like the 3 premium defender structure. Instead of Docherty + Foote, you could easily have Hampton + Treloar/Bont which I think gets you more points. I'm not really a fan of the lower tier defenders like Hibberd/Hartlett, but if you think they have what it takes, go for it.
Ryder + Eddy both missing in R9 leaves you with no bench cover and very close to a donut. Have a plan in case another player misses. I have all your other risky selections like Beams, Roughy, & Swallow so I think there are good reasons to select them!
Ryder + Eddy both missing in R9 leaves you with no bench cover and very close to a donut. Have a plan in case another player misses. I have all your other risky selections like Beams, Roughy, & Swallow so I think there are good reasons to select them!
Overall balance looks good. I dislike Swallow, but each to their own there. Have a think about Docherty and whether you need to use him to free up some cash to use if Sandilands goes down injured early. Docherty to Hodge will save you 100k and give you a look at Doch and whether he can back it up again. Hodge should get close to Doch at some stage and if he gets injured you could straight swap them.
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 4,731
- Likes
- 9,085
- AFL Club
- Brisbane
Firstly, happy Year of the Rooster. Listening to fireworks and Chinese talk shows... as you do.
Anyway, I can't figure out why my team looks so good compared to you allz so far - so awesome.
Main worry is that I'll get punted for rude team name.
Year Of The Cock. (Rooster wouldn't fit)
Docherty Adams Johannisen McGrath Keefe Scharenberg - Hampton Ryan
Dangerfield Rockliff Fyfe TMitchell Heppell Beams Swallow Myers - Powell-Pepper Bolton Jarman
Gawn Sandilands - Strnadica
Dalhaus Heeney Ryder Bennell McCluggage Pickett - Long Eddy
Ps. I'm not looking for advice, I'm showing you the TEAM to beat.
Edit: pss. Apologies, too much Bai Jiu... look it up. ok, Back to fireworks now
Anyway, I can't figure out why my team looks so good compared to you allz so far - so awesome.
Main worry is that I'll get punted for rude team name.
Year Of The Cock. (Rooster wouldn't fit)
Docherty Adams Johannisen McGrath Keefe Scharenberg - Hampton Ryan
Dangerfield Rockliff Fyfe TMitchell Heppell Beams Swallow Myers - Powell-Pepper Bolton Jarman
Gawn Sandilands - Strnadica
Dalhaus Heeney Ryder Bennell McCluggage Pickett - Long Eddy
Ps. I'm not looking for advice, I'm showing you the TEAM to beat.
Edit: pss. Apologies, too much Bai Jiu... look it up. ok, Back to fireworks now
Last edited:
Firstly, happy Year of the Rooster. Listening to fireworks and Chinese talk shows... as you do.
Anyway, I can't figure out why my team looks so good compared to you allz so far - so awesome.
Main worry is that I'll get punted for rude team name.
Year Of The Cock. (Rooster wouldn't fit)
Docherty Adams Johannisen McGrath Keefe Scharenberg - Hampton Ryan
Dangerfield Rockliff Fyfe TMitchell Heppell Beams Swallow Myers - Powell-Pepper Bolton Jarman
Gawn Sandilands - Strnadica
Dalhaus Heeney Ryder Bennell McCluggage Pickett - Long Eddy
Ps. I'm not looking for advice, I'm showing you the TEAM to beat.
Anyway, I can't figure out why my team looks so good compared to you allz so far - so awesome.
Main worry is that I'll get punted for rude team name.
Year Of The Cock. (Rooster wouldn't fit)
Docherty Adams Johannisen McGrath Keefe Scharenberg - Hampton Ryan
Dangerfield Rockliff Fyfe TMitchell Heppell Beams Swallow Myers - Powell-Pepper Bolton Jarman
Gawn Sandilands - Strnadica
Dalhaus Heeney Ryder Bennell McCluggage Pickett - Long Eddy
Ps. I'm not looking for advice, I'm showing you the TEAM to beat.
I'm surprised you got past the swear filter.
- Status