Competitions SCS Premier League Darts- World Championships - Tuesday 27th December @10:00pm AEDT

Which tournament scoring system would you like for 2023?

  • Keep current scoring system- Points accumulated throughout season

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Change to 10 for highest and 1 for lowest, scoring method based on 10 participants- Per Post 2,420

    Votes: 3 100.0%
  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .
Ironhawk

Ironhawk

#1,425
Joined
15 Mar 2019
Messages
15,286
Likes
58,997
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#1,425
Those R1 scores seem the wrong way around based on top and bottom spots compared to how we have done over the rest of the comp!

Managed to get someone through Rd 1 in 7/8 matches for this round, pity Heta lost stopping the sweep.

Price
Wright C
Van den Bergh VC
Aspinall
Van Duijvenbode
Noppert
 
Ironhawk

Ironhawk

#1,438
Joined
15 Mar 2019
Messages
15,286
Likes
58,997
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#1,438
Just looking ahead at the next round of tipping, and assuming all QF matches go to the higher seed (1-4), everyone will only have one of their 3 selections for the semis and final. No guarantee this will happen, especially seeing as two of the top 4 still haven't even made the QF yet, but it's quite possible, and theoretically is the most likely outcome. Seems a bit unusual that you might need to be relying on picking the best two QF losers to get a good score.

I'm happy to keep things as is, it would at least be a bit different, just throwing it out as a possibility you might not have considered (I'm sure you have).

3/3 for me today. For a tournament that looked like a tough one to call, I've surprised myself so far with 11/13 selections winning. Really did not expect that.
 
The Banker

The Banker

#1,439
Joined
24 Jan 2016
Messages
4,403
Likes
18,476
#1,439
Ironhawk said:
Just looking ahead at the next round of tipping, and assuming all QF matches go to the higher seed (1-4), everyone will only have one of their 3 selections for the semis and final. No guarantee this will happen, especially seeing as two of the top 4 still haven't even made the QF yet, but it's quite possible, and theoretically is the most likely outcome. Seems a bit unusual that you might need to be relying on picking the best two QF losers to get a good score.

I'm happy to keep things as is, it would at least be a bit different, just throwing it out as a possibility you might not have considered (I'm sure you have).

3/3 for me today. For a tournament that looked like a tough one to call, I've surprised myself so far with 11/13 selections winning. Really did not expect that.
Click to expand...
It’s deliberately set up that way to differentiate teams. I’d be very surprised if the top 4 continually make it through to the SF stage of each tournament. If they do though, that will force differential in itself. By introducing the Max 1 and coupling it with only 3 selections, it gives opportunity to differentiate. That was the angle behind it.
 
Ironhawk

Ironhawk

#1,440
Joined
15 Mar 2019
Messages
15,286
Likes
58,997
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#1,440
The Banker said:
It’s deliberately set up that way to differentiate teams. I’d be very surprised if the top 4 continually make it through to the SF stage of each tournament. If they do though, that will force differential in itself. By introducing the Max 1 and coupling it with only 3 selections, it gives opportunity to differentiate. That was the angle behind it.
Click to expand...
Not complaining, it adds to the challenge.


Agree the odds probably are against all of the top 4 make it through anyway, just gives me a bit more to think about with my next lot of picks. I'm not used to having so many progress at this stage of tournaments, usually my decisions are a lot simpler with my initial picks getting knocked out in early rounds. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top