Opinion Questions For Rowsus
- Thread starter Rowsus
- Start date
- Status
Hey Rowsus, needing a bit of advice.
7 trades left. $243,600 in kitty.
My plan this week was to go L Taylor out for SJ, but I'm not sure if I should be looking at other trades.
I don't have to worry about Watson, I don't have him, thank god!
I do have M Johnson, with Cutler and Bews on the bench.
I also have Cox with no back up (Currie and Thurlow).
I also have Hartung in mids and McCarthy up forward.
Not sure whether to cop a donut in the ruck?
Probably trade Johnson out for Hanley and still might out Taylor for SJ, not sure what to do. My lack of trades is a worry. Not really concerned about league games, mainly concentrating on ranking.
If you could have a peek at my team, I would appreciate it.
Thanks mate.
7 trades left. $243,600 in kitty.
My plan this week was to go L Taylor out for SJ, but I'm not sure if I should be looking at other trades.
I don't have to worry about Watson, I don't have him, thank god!
I do have M Johnson, with Cutler and Bews on the bench.
I also have Cox with no back up (Currie and Thurlow).
I also have Hartung in mids and McCarthy up forward.
Not sure whether to cop a donut in the ruck?
Probably trade Johnson out for Hanley and still might out Taylor for SJ, not sure what to do. My lack of trades is a worry. Not really concerned about league games, mainly concentrating on ranking.
If you could have a peek at my team, I would appreciate it.
Thanks mate.
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2014
- Messages
- 24
- Likes
- 0
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Hi T-mu,
I understand your thinking, but I don't think Ebert is your man. I can't see him averaging 110 from here. His main hurdle is in the last 2.5 seasons he only has one score higher than 130, and only 5 scores of 120+ in his last 45 games. It's too hard to keep a good average going without those better scores on a more consistent basis.
If you need a POD in that price range, I'd prefer Swallow or Cunnington, though North though they aren't a top team. If the price range isn't important, then I'd look more to K Jack (3.45% of teams) or Hannebery (3.18%), they fit your description better, and are more likely to score at 110 than Ebert (imo).
Good luck
I understand your thinking, but I don't think Ebert is your man. I can't see him averaging 110 from here. His main hurdle is in the last 2.5 seasons he only has one score higher than 130, and only 5 scores of 120+ in his last 45 games. It's too hard to keep a good average going without those better scores on a more consistent basis.
If you need a POD in that price range, I'd prefer Swallow or Cunnington, though North though they aren't a top team. If the price range isn't important, then I'd look more to K Jack (3.45% of teams) or Hannebery (3.18%), they fit your description better, and are more likely to score at 110 than Ebert (imo).
Good luck
Was thinking outside the box this morning, Ebert is a massive risk, cant afford that sort of risk in my position.
Hey Rowsus,
Managed to only drop 5 places last week to 221 and brought in Jobe who lasted only one week for me.
My issue now is I have Watson, Higgins I would like to move on. Really would like Parker in (should of done it last week) due to his consistency.
Don't mind SJ but seems a popular pick this week and would prefer a Jack or Hannebery but unfortunately can't afford either.
Only 9 trades with $67K and I know winning is now out of the question but would like to finisher as high as I could.
Is there any other option other than Watson to SJ and Higgins to Parker this week? Or is that just the best way to go? Would leave me with only Shenton/Taylor to upgrade?
Managed to only drop 5 places last week to 221 and brought in Jobe who lasted only one week for me.
My issue now is I have Watson, Higgins I would like to move on. Really would like Parker in (should of done it last week) due to his consistency.
Don't mind SJ but seems a popular pick this week and would prefer a Jack or Hannebery but unfortunately can't afford either.
Only 9 trades with $67K and I know winning is now out of the question but would like to finisher as high as I could.
Is there any other option other than Watson to SJ and Higgins to Parker this week? Or is that just the best way to go? Would leave me with only Shenton/Taylor to upgrade?
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 220
- Likes
- 490
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Hey Lobo,
Harvey/Gray are definitely good targets, and are likely to outscore your current F4/5/6. The problem with shifting Dangerfield up is you are basically saying that Roughead/Pavlich/Wingard are better scoring prospects than SJ/Libba/Fyfe. The move leaves Rough/Pav/Win in your team, while Danger takes a spot that could be taken by better scorers than Rough/Pav/Win.
It comes down to 3 choices.
Choose which one of Rough/Pav/Win you are willing to sacrifice to get Harvey/Gray.
Find a way to trade in Harvey/Gray that moves Rough/Pav/Win to F7 for loopholing/back-up purposes.
Live with the fact you just can't have Harvey/Gray, unless you are happy for them to sit at M8, because even though you'd shift Dangerfield up there, it is the equivalent of having Harvey/Gray at M8.
Roughead and Pav have lowish B/E's, and Wingard has a highish one. Keep in mind that Wingard's B/E will reduce dramatically next week, when his 10 drops out of his pricing cycle. All three of those players would appear to be some sort of chance to miss games, but it would seem likely that Pav is the one most likely to get a rest, or even worse a "red vest" rest.
I think you'd better off targetting someone like Fyfe, even with the "Lyon effect" factored in, than sitting a DPP Fwd in your Mid line. You have Shenton in your Mids right now, creating the desired link, you don't need/want another on the ground.
Good luck
Harvey/Gray are definitely good targets, and are likely to outscore your current F4/5/6. The problem with shifting Dangerfield up is you are basically saying that Roughead/Pavlich/Wingard are better scoring prospects than SJ/Libba/Fyfe. The move leaves Rough/Pav/Win in your team, while Danger takes a spot that could be taken by better scorers than Rough/Pav/Win.
It comes down to 3 choices.
Choose which one of Rough/Pav/Win you are willing to sacrifice to get Harvey/Gray.
Find a way to trade in Harvey/Gray that moves Rough/Pav/Win to F7 for loopholing/back-up purposes.
Live with the fact you just can't have Harvey/Gray, unless you are happy for them to sit at M8, because even though you'd shift Dangerfield up there, it is the equivalent of having Harvey/Gray at M8.
Roughead and Pav have lowish B/E's, and Wingard has a highish one. Keep in mind that Wingard's B/E will reduce dramatically next week, when his 10 drops out of his pricing cycle. All three of those players would appear to be some sort of chance to miss games, but it would seem likely that Pav is the one most likely to get a rest, or even worse a "red vest" rest.
I think you'd better off targetting someone like Fyfe, even with the "Lyon effect" factored in, than sitting a DPP Fwd in your Mid line. You have Shenton in your Mids right now, creating the desired link, you don't need/want another on the ground.
Good luck
Another thought Row.
7 trades left
Round 13. johnson out, duff in, hartung out, mcgovern in (swing harvey to mids (two trades) cop donut in ruck.
Round 14. ambrose out, harvey back to forwards, prem mid in (one trade)
Round 15. taylor, shenton out for whoever I can get (two trades)
leaves two trades with premiumish team
hoping Cox comes back ok.
????
Cheers
7 trades left
Round 13. johnson out, duff in, hartung out, mcgovern in (swing harvey to mids (two trades) cop donut in ruck.
Round 14. ambrose out, harvey back to forwards, prem mid in (one trade)
Round 15. taylor, shenton out for whoever I can get (two trades)
leaves two trades with premiumish team
hoping Cox comes back ok.
????
Cheers
- Joined
- 21 May 2012
- Messages
- 22,312
- Likes
- 31,158
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Torress, it's really funny. When I look at my projections there is less than 30 points between the 3 of them in their totals.
It comes out in the order Zorko, Westhoff, NRiewoldt. So if Zorko's DPP helps you out, go for him.
Good luck
It comes out in the order Zorko, Westhoff, NRiewoldt. So if Zorko's DPP helps you out, go for him.
Good luck
Hey Juzzo,
I think I would be looking at Johnson ---> Hanley, and McCarthy ---> S Martin.
This gives you Ruck coverage for this week and on going for quite a few weeks (hopefully).
It will also open up some loopholing opportunities in the coming weeks.
Generally I'd prefer to see how Martin performs this week before rushing into him, but your circumstances create an exception.
Good luck
I think I would be looking at Johnson ---> Hanley, and McCarthy ---> S Martin.
This gives you Ruck coverage for this week and on going for quite a few weeks (hopefully).
It will also open up some loopholing opportunities in the coming weeks.
Generally I'd prefer to see how Martin performs this week before rushing into him, but your circumstances create an exception.
Good luck
Hey Lobo,
Harvey/Gray are definitely good targets, and are likely to outscore your current F4/5/6. The problem with shifting Dangerfield up is you are basically saying that Roughead/Pavlich/Wingard are better scoring prospects than SJ/Libba/Fyfe. The move leaves Rough/Pav/Win in your team, while Danger takes a spot that could be taken by better scorers than Rough/Pav/Win.
It comes down to 3 choices.
Choose which one of Rough/Pav/Win you are willing to sacrifice to get Harvey/Gray.
Find a way to trade in Harvey/Gray that moves Rough/Pav/Win to F7 for loopholing/back-up purposes.
Live with the fact you just can't have Harvey/Gray, unless you are happy for them to sit at M8, because even though you'd shift Dangerfield up there, it is the equivalent of having Harvey/Gray at M8.
Roughead and Pav have lowish B/E's, and Wingard has a highish one. Keep in mind that Wingard's B/E will reduce dramatically next week, when his 10 drops out of his pricing cycle. All three of those players would appear to be some sort of chance to miss games, but it would seem likely that Pav is the one most likely to get a rest, or even worse a "red vest" rest.
I think you'd better off targetting someone like Fyfe, even with the "Lyon effect" factored in, than sitting a DPP Fwd in your Mid line. You have Shenton in your Mids right now, creating the desired link, you don't need/want another on the ground.
Good luck
Harvey/Gray are definitely good targets, and are likely to outscore your current F4/5/6. The problem with shifting Dangerfield up is you are basically saying that Roughead/Pavlich/Wingard are better scoring prospects than SJ/Libba/Fyfe. The move leaves Rough/Pav/Win in your team, while Danger takes a spot that could be taken by better scorers than Rough/Pav/Win.
It comes down to 3 choices.
Choose which one of Rough/Pav/Win you are willing to sacrifice to get Harvey/Gray.
Find a way to trade in Harvey/Gray that moves Rough/Pav/Win to F7 for loopholing/back-up purposes.
Live with the fact you just can't have Harvey/Gray, unless you are happy for them to sit at M8, because even though you'd shift Dangerfield up there, it is the equivalent of having Harvey/Gray at M8.
Roughead and Pav have lowish B/E's, and Wingard has a highish one. Keep in mind that Wingard's B/E will reduce dramatically next week, when his 10 drops out of his pricing cycle. All three of those players would appear to be some sort of chance to miss games, but it would seem likely that Pav is the one most likely to get a rest, or even worse a "red vest" rest.
I think you'd better off targetting someone like Fyfe, even with the "Lyon effect" factored in, than sitting a DPP Fwd in your Mid line. You have Shenton in your Mids right now, creating the desired link, you don't need/want another on the ground.
Good luck
Given the added Cox problem, I think you either need to "upgrade" Currie to Martin, or swap Cox to NicNat.
Using Martin/Currie option allows you to do some loopholing in the coming weeks, and provides coverage.
I think I'd go Watson/Currie ---> Fyfe/Martin.
Good luck
Hey Juzzo,
I think I would be looking at Johnson ---> Hanley, and McCarthy ---> S Martin.
This gives you Ruck coverage for this week and on going for quite a few weeks (hopefully).
It will also open up some loopholing opportunities in the coming weeks.
Generally I'd prefer to see how Martin performs this week before rushing into him, but your circumstances create an exception.
Good luck
I think I would be looking at Johnson ---> Hanley, and McCarthy ---> S Martin.
This gives you Ruck coverage for this week and on going for quite a few weeks (hopefully).
It will also open up some loopholing opportunities in the coming weeks.
Generally I'd prefer to see how Martin performs this week before rushing into him, but your circumstances create an exception.
Good luck
- Status