View attachment 1051
Fairly certain on this being my final draft. Lots of value and POD's in there, but I'm confident they'll all finish top 10-12 in their lines respectively. I've gone for durability in the midfield. No over priced players. Goldstein is the only one I'm willing to pay overs for, and that's only because it's set and forget in the rucks. Loving my spread of rookies, and the only one I'm unsure about is Ruggles. I have just enough cash to swap him to Uber ( who would be my captain loophole when Petracca comes back ). Ideally this is how it would stand though. Expecting Currie to be named.
A little bit of injury risk in Wells and Rich, but I believe Rich can definitely record a career best season this year and worst case scenario return 85 average which is more than adequate for D6/7. Wells is just too popular to avoid at that price. Sam Gray is one I'm not 100% on, but after doing further research I can understand the hype around him. I'm not sure of anyone else I would go for around that price bracket aside from Greene, and I just see more upside in Gray.
Thoughts? Too much speculation? Not enough "wow" factor? Sam Gray is one I'm not 100% on, but after doing further research I can understand the hype around him. Thanks for reading
Fairly certain on this being my final draft. Lots of value and POD's in there, but I'm confident they'll all finish top 10-12 in their lines respectively. I've gone for durability in the midfield. No over priced players. Goldstein is the only one I'm willing to pay overs for, and that's only because it's set and forget in the rucks. Loving my spread of rookies, and the only one I'm unsure about is Ruggles. I have just enough cash to swap him to Uber ( who would be my captain loophole when Petracca comes back ). Ideally this is how it would stand though. Expecting Currie to be named.
A little bit of injury risk in Wells and Rich, but I believe Rich can definitely record a career best season this year and worst case scenario return 85 average which is more than adequate for D6/7. Wells is just too popular to avoid at that price. Sam Gray is one I'm not 100% on, but after doing further research I can understand the hype around him. I'm not sure of anyone else I would go for around that price bracket aside from Greene, and I just see more upside in Gray.
Thoughts? Too much speculation? Not enough "wow" factor? Sam Gray is one I'm not 100% on, but after doing further research I can understand the hype around him. Thanks for reading
Mid: My only concern with your approach of going 4 + Libba (without one of Fyfe/Danger/Ablett) is that you may find yourself playing catch up early on as the majority of teams are going pretty deep on this line. Also not having the mentioned 3 Super Premiums limit your choice for weekly VC/C.
Ruc: Top 2 priced rucks, and having the luxury of Currie at R3.
Fwd: You've gone against the trend of most by adopting to go 4 deep when most are going with 2 or 3. I think that this is done at the expense of your midfield, so I would strongly consider asking yourself whether there are any other midfield premium you would prefer over your existing 4 forward premiums? Personally I would take a MID over a FWD, especially when there seems to be more rookies likely in the forward line.
Overall: Your selections of players are sound as there's potentially 16 season long keepers in that side, if you include Libba & Wells. However, I feel that your 4 + Libba midfield is somewhat compromised, especially when there's no Fyfe, Danger or Ablett amongst those lot. I would seriously consider trying to bring at least one of them into your team, maybe at the expense of your forward line.