Thanks Thanh - do you mean you think Hall will land in that range, or that you'd be satisfied with him as a starting pick if he did? I didn't start him so I would be paying around 108 for him, and probably looking for 105+ to make him a decent pick or better. That's well above his record before mid 2015, but about 10 points below what he has managed since then.
I don't think he's gone below 90 since he started playing in the midfield, so I think mid 90s would indicate he was playing forward again or potentially even getting the tag ahead of Gaz?
I would be happy if he averaged 93-98 for the remainder of the season, probably low on the expectation, but I like to be pleasantly surprised by my players!
Realistically, he could average 105 for the season, which would mean he needs to go at around 101 from hereon. Not a really bad trade in if that eventuate as he won't be much cheaper for the ensuing rounds.
I was going to suggest Dusty as a more valuable pick, but realised you already have him. All the other high averaging forwards are either priced at their max or overpriced so not really much value there if that's one of your determining criteria.
For my team, I'm keen to get on Dusty in the next couple of weeks and keeping a watch on Gunston & Wingard, but probably around bye time.
I think if you don't have the funds to get the MID you want and are planning on upgrading this round, then get Hall. If he continues on his ways, then you'll be laughing, otherwise there'll be a lot of coaches to share your pains if he doesn't.
Good luck with your decision.