And this is quite the dumbest reply I've seen in awhile as well. I guarantee you I do not follow every comment you've ever posted, and I have never seen your interpretation of how tackles work. You only quoting Rowsus instead of having your own input leaves me with no choice but to think you're agreeing with him just because he's Rowsus.
"Mate, if you're seriously going to complain over the scoring each week, why don't you go play AF or RDT instead... I don't get why you continue to play something that obviously makes you so angry and "triggered", as you put it yourself."
Classic response, still haven't provided sufficient justification to Bont's score, yet you're defending the system and telling any challenger of their scoring to leave. Like I said before, question what's infront of you instead of naively accept whatever you've been given, you have eyes and a brain for a reason.
"Mate, if you're seriously going to complain over the scoring each week, why don't you go play AF or RDT instead... I don't get why you continue to play something that obviously makes you so angry and "triggered", as you put it yourself."
Classic response, still haven't provided sufficient justification to Bont's score, yet you're defending the system and telling any challenger of their scoring to leave. Like I said before, question what's infront of you instead of naively accept whatever you've been given, you have eyes and a brain for a reason.
I was never trying to justify Bont's score, I agree it seems inflated while JPK seems underscored.. I was saying I think your interpretation of tackles is wrong. Not sure where you got the idea that that was my goal from?
I'm not telling people who question the scoring to leave at all, it just gets a little old and repetitive when it's literally the same one person who comes and complains about it week in, week out...