I reckon he should’ve been on at least 20 points. He was instead on like 6 points. The first goal was undervalued and the 2 50s were over-penalised
It was a mistake keeping the 3300 for shortened quarters. Players now get random scaling for doing nothing at the end of each quarter just to meet the quota & MG didn’t benefit at all from the random scaling last night when others did.
You know the system is broken if Dixon can score 20 more points than MG with just 5 touches & 1 goal. Don’t know why you would argue otherwise. Daisy Pearce had MG 4th best on ground so someone was certainly valuing what he was doing.
It was a mistake keeping the 3300 for shortened quarters. Players now get random scaling for doing nothing at the end of each quarter just to meet the quota & MG didn’t benefit at all from the random scaling last night when others did.
You know the system is broken if Dixon can score 20 more points than MG with just 5 touches & 1 goal. Don’t know why you would argue otherwise. Daisy Pearce had MG 4th best on ground so someone was certainly valuing what he was doing.