Discussion BBL|12: Planning Thread

Which of the more expensive players on a double do you have for round 1?

  • M Short

    Votes: 38 55.1%

  • R Khan

    Votes: 68 98.6%

  • Boult

    Votes: 23 33.3%

  • Sams

    Votes: 66 95.7%

  • J Sangha

    Votes: 16 23.2%

  • Thornton

    Votes: 1 1.4%

  • Clarke

    Votes: 24 34.8%

  • Siddle

    Votes: 36 52.2%

  • Sandhu

    Votes: 5 7.2%

  • Doggett

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    69
Status
Not open for further replies.
Diabolical

Diabolical

Leadership Group
#2,569
Joined
17 Jun 2014
Messages
9,621
Likes
37,730
AFL Club
Essendon
#2,569
Tamuhawk

Tamuhawk

Leadership Group
#2,570
Joined
4 Feb 2013
Messages
23,423
Likes
66,317
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#2,570
Diabolical said:
Well then, there goes my first trade out before the season starts! Just when I was starting to feel comfortable with my team!!
Click to expand...
Makes sense as he did request to go back to qlds for family reasons. Luckily for you they've announced it now and it wasn't a nasty surprise come round 3 lol.
 
T

The Myth

#2,573
Joined
11 Dec 2019
Messages
2,192
Likes
10,274
AFL Club
Gold Coast
#2,573
Beast_Mode said:
Devil's advocate for those intending to loop Gilkes:

What is your plan if he scores under 15 points in the first match against the Stars?

Will you look at anyone else (a single game player e.g. Wade or Philippe) or will you back him in?

Interested to hear some thoughts
Click to expand...
I don’t currently have Gilkes in my side but if I was looping him then I’d have a plan (probably billings) to put on field if he scores under 15. If you don’t have a plan to keep him off field for a sub 15 point score it’s silly to loop him imo (unless doing for VC/C purpose). The trickier situation imo is a score around 25-30.
 
Brendan12

Brendan12

#2,574
Joined
28 Jan 2021
Messages
2,203
Likes
8,682
AFL Club
Richmond
#2,574
Beast_Mode said:
Devil's advocate for those intending to loop Gilkes:

What is your plan if he scores under 15 points in the first match against the Stars?

Will you look at anyone else (a single game player e.g. Wade or Philippe) or will you back him in?

Interested to hear some thoughts
Click to expand...
If he scores poorly, it essentially then becomes a SGR for Gilkes, so Gilkes v Wade/Phillipe in which case you’re taking the better player
 
Brendan12

Brendan12

#2,575
Joined
28 Jan 2021
Messages
2,203
Likes
8,682
AFL Club
Richmond
#2,575
The Myth said:
I don’t currently have Gilkes in my side but if I was looping him then I’d have a plan (probably billings) to put on field if he scores under 15. If you don’t have a plan to keep him off field for a sub 15 point score it’s silly to loop him imo (unless doing for VC/C purpose). The trickier situation imo is a score around 25-30.
Click to expand...
The keepers in general are doing my head in. Still no idea what I’m doing with them haha
 
Diabolical

Diabolical

Leadership Group
#2,576
Joined
17 Jun 2014
Messages
9,621
Likes
37,730
AFL Club
Essendon
#2,576
Beast_Mode said:
Devil's advocate for those intending to loop Gilkes:

What is your plan if he scores under 15 points in the first match against the Stars?

Will you look at anyone else (a single game player e.g. Wade or Philippe) or will you back him in?

Interested to hear some thoughts
Click to expand...
I think it will be as much about where he is batting as his score. If he opened and other contenders for that spot didn’t kill it, I would risk the second game. If he is batting lower I would punt on an SGR keeper.
 
Brendan12

Brendan12

#2,577
Joined
28 Jan 2021
Messages
2,203
Likes
8,682
AFL Club
Richmond
#2,577
Diabolical said:
I think it will be as much about where he is batting as his score. If he opened and other contenders for that spot didn’t kill it, I would risk the second game. If he is batting lower I would punt on an SGR keeper.
Click to expand...
How are you lining up with the keepers atm? Seems to be the big issue of the pre season so far
 
Diabolical

Diabolical

Leadership Group
#2,578
Joined
17 Jun 2014
Messages
9,621
Likes
37,730
AFL Club
Essendon
#2,578
Brendan12 said:
How are you lining up with the keepers atm? Seems to be the big issue of the pre season so far
Click to expand...
It’s still an issue. I was settling on Gilkes with a Billings back up plan. That was connected to another loop I was using Renshaw as backup for, but those plans need to change. I think I would now like to just pay up and try and make Philippe / Billings loop work if I can. That would mean switching Gilkes down to a $62.5k batter.
 
Beast_Mode

Beast_Mode

#2,579
Joined
21 Jan 2019
Messages
836
Likes
3,768
AFL Club
North Melb.
#2,579
Diabolical said:
It’s still an issue. I was settling on Gilkes with a Billings back up plan. That was connected to another loop I was using Renshaw as backup for, but those plans need to change. I think I would now like to just pay up and try and make Philippe / Billings loop work if I can. That would mean switching Gilkes down to a $62.5k batter.
Click to expand...
Philippe is a tough one, I feel we will be paying either 120k or 200k for him by round 5 if we don't pick him now!
 
Hawk41

Hawk41

#2,580
Joined
20 Jan 2016
Messages
570
Likes
2,848
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#2,580
Diabolical said:
For those who I have made very DGR focused and are looking to go overs on Thunder players, here are some figures to consider from last year's BBL. They are the average if we sorted each team's SC score from highest to lowest for each match. So the highest is the average of all the highest scores for each team in every match and the lowest is the average of the 11th highest scorer for each team on average. I have split it between winning teams and losing teams to get a sense of the split, because on average the winning team takes almost 60% of the scoring pie.

View attachment 49755
We can actually average the magic 55 number with 9 players from the winning team, however, they need to be the top 9 scorers on average! When it comes to the losing team, we can't have more than 5 players to score similarly on average per player.
Click to expand...
I did a similar thing a couple of seasons back but not by team just ranking all 22 players.
And found the same thing only ranks 1 to about 4/5 scored over 50+ in a game.
Good to see the same thing still holds up looking at last season and when breaking it up per team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top