2023: SC Planning Thread
- Thread starter Gruffles
- Start date
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 38,963
- Likes
- 126,636
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
View: https://twitter.com/tim_michell/status/1631064496679665666?t=3yGmbTiTNweVc6zIYK1QiQ&s=19
Could be getting both Trac and Gawn as fwd dpps. The game last weekend certainly suggested that Trac will be pushed more forward.
Could be getting both Trac and Gawn as fwd dpps. The game last weekend certainly suggested that Trac will be pushed more forward.
He was moved for a little bit down back in their practice game and still racked up a lot of the ball there. Realistically, can you see them taking out the best inside midfielder in the comp out of their midfield? I really doubt it.
I'm probably not going to select him but that's due to financial constraints in getting the structure i like and not being encumbered by potentially crap rookies (even trying to avoid questionable rookies on the bench if possible).
I'm probably not going to select him but that's due to financial constraints in getting the structure i like and not being encumbered by potentially crap rookies (even trying to avoid questionable rookies on the bench if possible).
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 19,074
- Likes
- 80,340
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Ah yes, it was around about this time last year that we were told Neale would spend time up forward. How did that turn out?
Highly doubt that arguably the league's best midfielder will be spending any less than 90% of his time on ground in the midfield but hopefully Trac's comment regarding Oliver throws a few off.
Highly doubt that arguably the league's best midfielder will be spending any less than 90% of his time on ground in the midfield but hopefully Trac's comment regarding Oliver throws a few off.
- Joined
- 24 Feb 2015
- Messages
- 6,697
- Likes
- 30,160
- AFL Club
- Sydney
The mind games begin.
Am I missing something about picking players who have maxed out in their ultimate position in the hope they get DPP? I mean to get DPP, doesn’t that mean they play in a position that is likely to be not as prolific in scoring as where they are priced coming into round 1? Why would you sacrifice early points and dollars for 6 weeks in the hope for a positional change? Seems very risky to me.
Am I missing something about picking players who have maxed out in their ultimate position in the hope they get DPP? I mean to get DPP, doesn’t that mean they play in a position that is likely to be not as prolific in scoring as where they are priced coming into round 1? Why would you sacrifice early points and dollars for 6 weeks in the hope for a positional change? Seems very risky to me.
Based on the roles from last weekend, I think guys like McVee, Cincotta, Chesser and Constable are the ones that can make the required cash (might be missing some). Also if you're going to play in the forward line, Melbourne is probably the better team to do it so Chandler might be a decent one as well if he can hold his spot. Outside of them, not really sure of the rest and probably outside of Constable, wouldn't feel comfortable fielding any of them.
