Position Forward Discussion
- Thread starter IDIG
- Start date
Averaged nearly 100 from R17 - GF, very underpriced for that sort of output. He was coming back from injury, which wrote off the first part of his season.
I really want to stay away from all key forwards, but he has snuck into some of my teams. Not sure if he'll make it in or not, as he is both mid priced and key position. Signs are pointing to stay away, but may risk it if I go with one team I have that I like the look of.
I really want to stay away from all key forwards, but he has snuck into some of my teams. Not sure if he'll make it in or not, as he is both mid priced and key position. Signs are pointing to stay away, but may risk it if I go with one team I have that I like the look of.
If you have him for whole season, you just ride the waves of good and bad weeks.. if he plays 22 games at 85-90 I’ll take that, saves me a trade. 90 puts him at top 20 and it was really the second half of the season he improved, not just the last 5 games. If Tigers go well again I see no reason why Lynch wouldn’t too
- Joined
- 24 Feb 2015
- Messages
- 6,697
- Likes
- 30,160
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I get what you say but for two things:
- he had no preseason and improved throughout the season with no injury dramas so far this preseason
- week to week doesn’t matter if he ends up a top ten forward that you can get at the start of the season for a discount.. sure it’s no fun when he has a howler but hey it’s overall points for the season that counts
EDIT: I should add I don’t currently have him in my team but you asked what the argument s for doing so would be
- he had no preseason and improved throughout the season with no injury dramas so far this preseason
- week to week doesn’t matter if he ends up a top ten forward that you can get at the start of the season for a discount.. sure it’s no fun when he has a howler but hey it’s overall points for the season that counts
EDIT: I should add I don’t currently have him in my team but you asked what the argument s for doing so would be
Playing for who though ....
Have him in only one of my potential setups .... gives me scope to start with no on field rookies in the forward line but also a free look at Rankine etc on the bench before potentially committing them to an on field role ...
If it goes pear shaped then will be the first gone in round 3 ... got some swingsets in place to cope with that if need be ...
Have him in only one of my potential setups .... gives me scope to start with no on field rookies in the forward line but also a free look at Rankine etc on the bench before potentially committing them to an on field role ...
If it goes pear shaped then will be the first gone in round 3 ... got some swingsets in place to cope with that if need be ...
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 38,960
- Likes
- 126,628
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I'm open to both. If I look at Dev Smith vs Tom Lynch and think they are both a cheap F5-F6 I would prefer the player with a high standard deviation. They have the ability for some higher spike scores which 1. Can make their price higher and make them tradeable. 2. Can give you a POD VC especially with Richmond's early games at the G. Lynch into Grundy rnd 1! 3. Increase your chances of winning the weekly prize. 4. Can be looped off the bench.
Dream come true for a supercoach nerd. ?
Dream come true for a supercoach nerd. ?
- Joined
- 24 Feb 2015
- Messages
- 6,697
- Likes
- 30,160
- AFL Club
- Sydney
That’s missing a heap of last years forwards like Dunkley, Danger, Daniel, Boak, Marshall, Kelly, Worpel off the top of my head though.
Still, maybe but again that’s his best season numbers in 9 years which still is the only real data we have, would be dangerous to take a run of 12 games from one season and expect that as his new norm.
Still, maybe but again that’s his best season numbers in 9 years which still is the only real data we have, would be dangerous to take a run of 12 games from one season and expect that as his new norm.
