Thing is, I've always been too afraid to actually go through with my first thoughts, to my detriment.
For instance, last season I:
Had Serong as one my first picked in pre-season, only to not pick him and watch him go 130 for the first 10 weeks, whilst I started Jordan Dawson.
Switched Nic Martin and Xerri to English.
Thought about trading Luke Jackson out at $600k and then baulked.
I do totally agree that from an overall perspective, there's a lot of risk that seems apparent, but I've been in a situation where I've tried to play it safe only to miss the 50/50 on which premium mid comes out with a 140 average and the other that goes 95. The other issue is that so many decent players have either scoring or role concerns or bye worries. I will agree that I probably only have 1 or 2 of the top line players on any line, but I think that plan maximises the chance of me picking off those uber-elite premiums when they fall in price.
Looking at my current list profile:
Fallen Premiums: Sicily, Oliver, Mills
Needs a bit of a boost to be in the top 6/8 of their line: NWM, Clark, JHF, Rankine
Breakout Candidates: McKercher, Richards, Young, Darcy, TDK
Just there for the ride: Peatling, Flynn
We're all in the same boat: Macrae, Smith, Phillipou, Daniel
Paradoxically, I think a lineup like this minimizes risk, if I want to finish with a solid ranking, buying low is absolutely paramount. I won't have to try to decide whether to hold onto an expensive investment or not, and with discipline I can ignore those $650k hot-streak players like Luke Ryan and Matt Rowell last year. Granted, I'll cop it if someone goes off in the early stage of the season and I don't have them, but statistically speaking, the likelyhood of a player above $600k outperforming their value is slim, unless it's a specific player for a specific reason.
For a bit of experimentation, I've put a list of every player over the past 4 years who were in the top 10 SC scorers by average for that year. A total of 27 players.
View attachment 83243
Additionally, here are how the top 10 scorers by average in a particular season compared with their previous and subsequent seasons:
View attachment 83242
View attachment 83244
View attachment 83245
View attachment 83246
Whilst not a complete list, as a player might have not been in the top 10 for any season yet hit an average of 114.9, here's another bit of analysis:
View attachment 83247
Going by these statistics:
Tier 1:
Bontempelli is a 100% chance to drop in average.
Tier 2:
Gawn and Butters have a 83.3% chance to drop in average.
Tier 3:
Xerri, Neale, Flanders, Sheezel, Daicos, Heeney, Ryan, Treloar, Serong and Merrett have a 81.25% chance to drop in average.
Tier 4:
Marshall, Dunkley, Whitfield, Cripps, Zorko, McGovern and Nankervis have a 63.63% chance to increase in average.
The issue is that these tier 4 players all have massive question marks; but this is where in most seasons you'd be looking for that safe upside potential.
If we go to Tier 5 you're looking at Sinclair and Brayshaw types. Some might consider English, LDU, Green, Houston or even Nic Martin, but most of these players are competing with Tier 3 players because of the massive question marks on the 110-114.9 averaging players, and when you're speculating on a breakout the difference between a Tier 5 player and speculating on a Tier 6 or 7 becomes far less certain, especially in the defence and forward line.
So for me, are those Tier 3 players worth investing in?
Of the 10: 5 have the early bye, so you have to think they need to outperform their average by about 2.5ppg to be worth picking. Before the pre-season news about his PF I might have though Daicos could do it. Of the rest, maybe Xerri and Sheezel are the best bets to maintain their average, but Xerri shares the same bye and line as TDK with massive upside potential. Sheezel seems a very solid pick but the fact is that North's most stacked area is probably their midfield. Granted, he is probably their best player but also most likely option out of him/LDU/Wardlaw to push forward of the ball. Flanders is a wait and see because of both role and the bye. I'm gambling that Clark and Young straight out out-average Ryan and Serong. Post byes last season Ryan and Serong did outperform Clark and Young respectively, but very narrowly.