At the end of every season they post a side that would have won overall without making any trades (I actually haven't see one for last year?).
Those teams will generally have 2 uber premos simply for the captain scores, maybe 2 or 3 of the best rookie scorers, with the rest being mid-price or speculative picks. It is impossible to get anywhere near nailing a side like that, but the numbers don't lie. The more of those picks you can get right, the better you will go.
It is the Sicily, Hewett, Cripps type picks that matter more than which top-end premos you select. Too many people become fixated on dollars spent equals more points.
Those teams will generally have 2 uber premos simply for the captain scores, maybe 2 or 3 of the best rookie scorers, with the rest being mid-price or speculative picks. It is impossible to get anywhere near nailing a side like that, but the numbers don't lie. The more of those picks you can get right, the better you will go.
It is the Sicily, Hewett, Cripps type picks that matter more than which top-end premos you select. Too many people become fixated on dollars spent equals more points.
Salem , Yeo , Haynes , Bailey Williams (WB) , Clark , Bowes
Holmes , Hopper , Sheed , Fyfe * , Worpel , Thomas * , Flanders * etc
etc etc
$150k-> Allen looks to have even more options , who may (or may not) have better JS and scoring capabilities than all these new rookies who have yet to play at this level.
Just a matter if they score enough (say 75-90 ppg) over say 8-10 rounds to make that $ 150k , maybe the $150k-> Allen bracket 65 - 75 PPG is a more realistic expectation (will need to check if they have achieved this in the past)
Then all comes down to picking those "perfect" 10-12 starting rookies that can make that "magical" $ 150k as well early doors , get dropped after 3-4 games and everything stalls.
50 days to come so plenty of discussion ahead
Last edited: